Hi Piotr,

compiler? seems to me more a pom config, isn't it?
I really don't know since I didn't look into that part, but in my way of
think, that should not be included inside compiler.

Thanks


2017-11-19 13:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>:

> Carlos,
>
> In case of Maven build we will probably have to teach compiler about that.
> Of course I may be wrong. :)
>
> Piotr
>
> 2017-11-19 13:28 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>:
>
> > That sounds very good Alex
> > I think having flash/flex/air added as a "plugin" later for people that
> > would want to add that output, is the better approach.
> > As well, that would make the weight lighter, and for building, in the
> case
> > of maven will remove all the artifact dependencies to flash/flex and the
> > mavenizer that make us to use the settings xml. So it would be more easy.
> > However, is important that we could add SWF support later, but for what
> you
> > said, seems to be the plan already
> > So +1 to this change
> > Thanks
> >
> > 2017-11-19 7:38 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > I don't know about playerglobal.swc, but airglobal.swc will be around
> for
> > > Adobe AIR.
> > >
> > > The whole point of the feature/rename branch is to remove references to
> > > Flex and Flash and that includes removing dependency on both
> > > playerglobal.swc and airglobal.swc.
> > >
> > > My goal is that the first Royale release does not require
> > > playerglobal/airglobal, but you can bring it down as an optional
> feature.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to