I think it would be good if we do: apache-royale-x.x.x and apache-royale-with-swf-x.x.x. That makes it much clearer.
Thanks, Om On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > OK, I think I got the packaging fixed. The CI server is building it and > should finish in 90 minutes or so. > > You can try it out locally if you want by syncing up and running "ant > release" and pointing NPM at the tar.gz file in the out folder. I think > you need to "npm uninstall flexjs" first. I only tried the -jsonly- > package and it installed for me. I didn't do any further testing to see > if the command-line scripts worked or not. If you run against the other > -bin.tar.gz it should try to run the code that downloads Adobe stuff, > which might need tuning. > > I'm thinking we should create s.apache.org URLs for the nightly builds so > you could do something like: > > npm install http://s.apache.org/Royale090NightlyBuild > > But before we do that, we should decide on the package names. Right now > it is: > > apache-royale-0.9.0-bin This contains SWF support. > apache-royale-jsonly-0.9.0.bin > > A while back I suggested: > > apache-royale-flexjs-0.9.0-bin This contains SWF support. > apache-royale-0.9.0.bin The default package is JS only. > > Another option is: > > apache-royale-swf-0.9.0-bin This contains SWF support. > apache-royale-0.9.0.bin The default package is JS only. > > I still think it might be valuable to have 'flexjs' in the package name > for the package with SWF support. > > > Thoughts? > -Alex > > > > On 12/12/17, 10:18 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > >The package on the CI server aren't working with NPM. I think I messed up > >the Ant script. Looking into it now. > > > >-Alex > > > >On 12/12/17, 10:10 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > >Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>On Dec 12, 2017 8:41 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>On 12/12/17, 3:51 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > >>Muppirala" > >><omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>>On Dec 12, 2017 12:25 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > wrote: > >>> > >>>I just pushed changes to see if it can work. We'll see after the CI > >>>server builds it. In theory, you will be able to run: > >>> > >>> npm install > >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fapachefl > >>>e > >>>x > >>>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs% > 2FlastSuccessfulBuil&data= > >>>0 > >>>2 > >>>%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5d4cb0a761544b1e6dce08d54156 > c7cb%7Cfa7b1b5a > >>>7 > >>>b > >>>34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486763331683835& > sdata=99F1YaFJunpkbE > >>>E > >>>Z > >>>WSuZdiO2LJAEHAud55Tq5tx%2FYnM%3D&reserved=0 > >>>d/artifact/out/apache-royale-jsonly-0.9.0-bin.tar.gz > >>> > >>>And it should install the JSOnlu package. Alternatively, you run: > >>> > >>> npm install > >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fapachefl > >>>e > >>>x > >>>build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs% > 2FlastSuccessfulBuil&data= > >>>0 > >>>2 > >>>%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5d4cb0a761544b1e6dce08d54156 > c7cb%7Cfa7b1b5a > >>>7 > >>>b > >>>34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486763331683835& > sdata=99F1YaFJunpkbE > >>>E > >>>Z > >>>WSuZdiO2LJAEHAud55Tq5tx%2FYnM%3D&reserved=0 > >>>d/artifact/out/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin.tar.gz > >>> > >>> > >>>Does this tarball contain the Adobe dependencies as well? > >> > >>No, it will try to download the Adobe stuff like the earlier npm-flexjs > >>code did. However, it only need to try to get the Adobe stuff since > >>other > >>things it looks like it used to download are in the package (framework, > >>falcon, swfobject). > >> > >>Thanks, > >>-Alex > >>> > >> > >>Sounds good. I will start working on this today. > >> > >>Thanks, > >>Om > > > >
