When I was developing MDL library, I was with debug= true and for me
compilation was quick.
When I tried things this months here and there I don't think it was slow.
So for me this could be something to look later.

As always, I want to order things by priority and we should attack what we
don't already have yet that improve something that is already working

that's always my strategy in all lines of work for a project that is not
100% in all its features

My 2 ctns :)





2018-01-05 22:17 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>:

> The compiler has not been optimized at all.  It was a full rewrite to use
> a different (and more traditional) parsing front-end, but the SWF output
> also uses a newer and unproven technology, and the JS output was written
> at Apache and has not been optimized at all.
>
> I'm quite certain the compiler could be made faster, but we don't have the
> people power to do it.  I think the -debug=true compile time is sufficient
> for now and we have bigger fish to fry.  But if you are having unexpected
> slowness, we should take a look.
>
> The MXML Live Editor might be a better and easier place to spend some
> energy.  Any volunteers?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 1/5/18, 12:56 PM, "Olaf Krueger" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>If you compile using debug=true and only JSRoyale
> >That's a good hint, I am currently testing Moonshine and I guess I forgot
> >about this...
> >
> >>Developing that more would be a nice project at some point
> >Agree :-)
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Olaf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Sent from:
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-roy
> >ale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7
> >C642afdeb569f440a7b4408d5547ed595%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7
> >C0%7C636507826090204102&sdata=vDLa6fYw3cBODwDcxO0szDWUIncIgy
> Vv8HDUR5kPWgQ%
> >3D&reserved=0
>
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to