Yeah, we'll see what patterns folks want to use. I'm not convinced you can write an Alignment bead that will know what to do in all situations. I think we're going to end up with custom scenario-oriented containers: ContainerThatCentersChildren, TileContainerThatCentersChildren, ThreePaneContainer, etc.
Of course, I could be wrong... -Alex On 1/6/18, 11:54 AM, "Olaf Krueger" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Alex, > >>It may be a bead, or you might just subclass HorizontalFlexLayout, call >>it >HorizontalFlexLayoutThatCentersChildren... > >Even if this 'Express' style seems to be comfortable during development I >am >not sure if those verbose named beads are the best option. >I fear that there will be a confusing number of those beads someday whose >provide different combinations of features/things. > >I am not sure if something like this would be easier to understand and >easier to handle at the end: > ><js:Group> > <js:beads> > <js:FlexLayout> > <js:Vertical> > <js:Alignment value="center"> > </js:beads> ><js:/Groups> > >However, I first have to get more experienced with this stuff in order to >form an opinion. >I keep this in mind... ;-) > >Thanks, >Olaf > > > >-- >Sent from: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-roy >ale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7 >C563e03e2929743b0e73508d5553f53e4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7 >C0%7C636508652866559760&sdata=ypZBDr40YeGAdnbQAdj88stIR9d%2B6AYEVw8TWQFQxs >4%3D&reserved=0
