Yeah. Maybe. In my case, I just used Array instead of ArrayList, but that
shouldn’t really be necessary…
> On Jan 26, 2018, at 12:29 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Harbs,
>
> I've looked couple of times into the DropDownList from Basic. Maybe it's
> time to reorganize things. Add there View, Model, Renderers etc ? I did
> that for MDL DropDownList.
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
> 2018-01-25 23:18 GMT+01:00 Gabe Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
>
>> The dataProvider setter in DropDownList has the following code:
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
>> opt = document.createElement('option') as
>> HTMLOptionElement;
>> if (lf)
>> opt.text = value[i][lf];
>> else
>> opt.text = value[i];
>> dd.add(opt, null);
>> }
>>
>> Basically, it makes the assumption that the dataProvider is an
>> index-accessible object. This is not the case if the dataProvider is a
>> collection. In that case, the code should be something like this:
>>
>> opt.text = value.getItemAt(i)[lf];
>> else
>> opt.text = value.getItemAt(i);
>>
>> I’m not sure of the best way to generalize this.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> Harbs
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
