Another question. I build one of my example with newest royale package. I
have following static getter [1]. This code previously was working [2]. Now
this Array is not being assigned to dataProvider. My dataProvider is
undefined.

Can you say what could change, if not I will prepare small example.

[1]  https://goo.gl/rPkNog
[2]  https://goo.gl/qh3pSC

Thanks, Piotr

2018-02-22 20:55 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:

> On 2/22/18, 11:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Alex,
> >
> >So in my css I cannot do such things ?
> >
> >global {
> >   IStatesImpl: ClassReference("org.apache.royale.core.SimpleStatesImpl")
> ;
> >}
>
> That will still work, because IStatesImpl is not css-compliant, so it is
> only available via ValuesManager and ValuesManager knows to use "global"
> selector as the default.
>
> -Alex
>
> >
> >
> >2018-02-22 19:38 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Ahh that is what you mean! :) Good idea. I will try in the next week
> >>play
> >> with that! :)
> >>
> >> Thanks Harbs for clarification :)
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> 2018-02-22 18:59 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >>
> >>> Yep.  It would fun to see what APIs Moonshine itself uses.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 2/22/18, 9:48 AM, "Gabe Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >I think Alex was suggesting to run it on the Moonshine *codebase*.
> >>> >
> >>> >> On Feb 22, 2018, at 7:39 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
> >>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >>> >
> >>> >>wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Yep. That's what I suggested to Alina, because she was started to
> >>>use
> >>> >> Moonshine. I think it's doable also through the VSCode. In the end
> >>>it
> >>> is
> >>> >> all about passing that argument as additional compiler options.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> 2018-02-22 18:36 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Isn't Moonshine also a SWF-based app?  Could try it there too.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> -Alex
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On 2/22/18, 9:31 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> Carlos,
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> It would be great to get that report from your application!
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Thanks, Piotr
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> 2018-02-22 18:17 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>> Your point of view is valid, but it might depend on the kind of
> >>> >>>>> application.  Some might have 100's of views to port, others
> >>>might
> >>> >>>>>only
> >>> >>>>> have 2 or 3 views and a million lines of business logic.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> In another thread I mentioned the -api-report option I added.  It
> >>> >>>>>would
> >>> >>>>> be
> >>> >>>>> interesting for folks to try getting API reports on their Flex
> >>>apps
> >>> >>>>>so
> >>> >>>>> we
> >>> >>>>> can see what folks are using so we can use that in making
> >>>decisions.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> My 2 cents,
> >>> >>>>> -Alex
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> On 2/22/18, 8:39 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of
> Carlos
> >>> >>>>> Rovira"
> >>> >>>>> <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> Without know nothing about the solution I want to share a
> >>>though: I
> >>> >>>>> think
> >>> >>>>>> the implementation of all the things related to visuals (and
> >>>css is
> >>> >>>>> one of
> >>> >>>>>> them) is completely different in Royale to what it was in flex,
> >>>so
> >>> >>>>> maybe
> >>> >>>>>> we
> >>> >>>>>> should not be worried that CSS is not following main flex rules.
> >>> >>>>>> For me UX in royale must be done from scratch, if someone is
> >>> >>>>> migrating, we
> >>> >>>>>> can only provide some basic *structure* similar to what Flex
> >>>was.
> >>> >>>>>>But
> >>> >>>>>> that's only some kind of guide and could mean around 5-10% of
> >>>what
> >>> >>>>>>they
> >>> >>>>>> must to migrate. So this is the opposite to things more related
> >>>to
> >>> >>>>>> "business" (like the ArrayCollection disscussion we made some
> >>>days
> >>> >>>>> ago),
> >>> >>>>>> in
> >>> >>>>>> this case, there's very few to save from a flex codebase point
> >>>of
> >>> >>>>>>view,
> >>> >>>>>> and
> >>> >>>>>> CSS is one of the things I don't expect to reuse if I come from
> >>> flex
> >>> >>>>>> codebase.
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> 2018-02-22 17:27 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui
> >>><aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> Well, it might be a migration issue in the sense that you could
> >>> >>>>>>>use a
> >>> >>>>>>> selector called "global" in Flex and it would become the
> >>>default
> >>> >>>>> value
> >>> >>>>>>> for
> >>> >>>>>>> styles.
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> Flex and Royale CSS has non-compliant CSS in it like
> >>>"cffHinting"
> >>> >>>>>>>or
> >>> >>>>>>> "focusSkin" in Flex or "IStatesImpl" in Royale.  Non-compliant
> >>> >>>>>>>styles
> >>> >>>>>>> are
> >>> >>>>>>> not emitted to the final .css file since the browser has no use
> >>> for
> >>> >>>>>>> them,
> >>> >>>>>>> but are kept in a data structure used by ValuesManager.  If you
> >>> use
> >>> >>>>>>> "global" for non-compliant style properties, it will work in
> >>> Royale
> >>> >>>>> like
> >>> >>>>>>> it did in Flex, but if you use "global" to try to set the
> >>> >>>>>>>fontFamily
> >>> >>>>> to
> >>> >>>>>>> Gothic everywhere in your app it will not work in Royale as it
> >>>did
> >>> >>>>>>>in
> >>> >>>>>>> Flex.
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> Until this change we renamed "global" in the final CSS to "*"
> >>>so
> >>> it
> >>> >>>>>>> would
> >>> >>>>>>> have a more global effect, but I took that out because I'm not
> >>> sure
> >>> >>>>> that
> >>> >>>>>>> "*" is the equivalent since "*" actually has precedence over
> >>>Type
> >>> >>>>>>> Selectors.  I'm not quite sure how to create the true
> >>>equivalent
> >>> of
> >>> >>>>> Flex
> >>> >>>>>>> global styles.
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> We could rename what I'm currently calling "global" in Royale
> >>>to
> >>> >>>>>>> something
> >>> >>>>>>> else like "royale" and go back to renaming "global" to "*",
> >>>but I
> >>> >>>>> think
> >>> >>>>>>> that will end up with complaints.  I think it might be right
> >>>for
> >>> >>>>>>>the
> >>> >>>>>>> migration docs to mention this and offer alternatives like
> >>>moving
> >>> >>>>> some
> >>> >>>>>>> styles from global to "*" if they understand the impact of
> >>>doing
> >>> >>>>>>>so.
> >>> >>>>>>> Also, everything is currently a child of the Application so
> >>> setting
> >>> >>>>>>> Application styles should have a global effect, but I think
> >>>both
> >>> >>>>>>>will
> >>> >>>>>>> still override type selectors.
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> My 2 cents,
> >>> >>>>>>> -Alex
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> On 2/22/18, 7:44 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of
> >>>Carlos
> >>> >>>>>>> Rovira"
> >>> >>>>>>> <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org>
> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> Hi Andrew, this is new for Apache Royale since is how to deal
> >>> with
> >>> >>>>> CSS
> >>> >>>>>>> and
> >>> >>>>>>>> how browsers manage it.
> >>> >>>>>>>> So maybe not much relation with Flex in this case
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> Best
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> Carlos
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> 2018-02-22 13:27 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore
> >>><cottag...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>> Is this a migration issue for Flex apps, or is this specific
> >>>to
> >>> >>>>>>> Royale?
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Alex Harui
> >>> >>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2/22/18, 1:12 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of
> >>> >>>>> Carlos
> >>> >>>>>>>>> Rovira"
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of
> >>>carlosrov...@apache.org>
> >>> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think this is a very good change since I had many
> >>>problems
> >>> >>>>> with
> >>> >>>>>>> MDL
> >>> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> have to use the exclusion on CSS to make it work properly.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> If I understand ok, I should see fonts at 16px, that I
> >>>think
> >>> is
> >>> >>>>>>>>> nowadays
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> the standard for "normal" text, so good.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> What I don't understand is what basic should making any
> >>> change.
> >>> >>>>>>> From
> >>> >>>>>>>>> my
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> point of view basic is as the name says...basic, and I
> >>>don't
> >>> >>>>> like
> >>> >>>>>>> to
> >>> >>>>>>>>> make
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> fonts 12px.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I only expect in basic to see the wiring of beads like
> >>>views,
> >>> >>>>>>> models
> >>> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> controllers. But I think almost no CSS rules should be
> >>>there,
> >>> >>>>>>> hence
> >>> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> basic point at the lowest level, where users only have the
> >>> >>>>> basics
> >>> >>>>>>> of
> >>> >>>>>>>>> what
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> royale provides without any customization.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's how I see it
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> I think I agree.  That's sort of where I was heading by
> >>> >>>>> creating a
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> separate theme in basic.css.  Basic.css is separate from the
> >>> >>>>>>>>> defaults.css
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> in Basic.swc.  Maybe we should give basic.css a different
> >>>name.
> >>> >>>>>>> The
> >>> >>>>>>>>> goal
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> of basic.css was to give our examples and anybody else
> >>>building
> >>> >>>>> the
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> smallest app on Basic a more Flex-like look.  I just don't
> >>> think
> >>> >>>>>>> Serif
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> 16px looks good.  It is true that more traditional CSS
> >>>visual
> >>> >>>>>>> styles
> >>> >>>>>>>>> can
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> be moved from the Basic defaults.css to whatever we call
> >>> >>>>> basic.css.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Someone else can do that work once we see how this change
> >>> >>>>> affects
> >>> >>>>>>>>> Vivid
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> and other themes like MDL.  I'm not sure if every component
> >>>set
> >>> >>>>>>> should
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> have a separate theme file or SWC as well.  Or if there are
> >>>a
> >>> >>>>> few
> >>> >>>>>>>>> visual
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> styles in that should remain in Basic's defaults.css so that
> >>> >>>>> other
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> component sets don't have to repeat that information.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> -Alex
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2018-02-22 2:43 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui
> >>> >>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Royale has been using the universal selector for a while
> >>>now
> >>> >>>>> to
> >>> >>>>>>> set
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> defaults for Royale apps.  However, that caused problems
> >>>with
> >>> >>>>>>> other
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> third-party CSS.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I just pushed changes to the compiler and framework so
> >>>that
> >>> >>>>> we
> >>> >>>>>>>>> don't
> >>> >>>>>>>>> use
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the * selector.  Instead we will be using the * selector
> >>> >>>>>>> properly
> >>> >>>>>>>>> if
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> provided by the users CSS and we are using a special
> >>>selector
> >>> >>>>>>>>> called
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "global" as the "browser defaults" and the final selector
> >>>in
> >>> >>>>> the
> >>> >>>>>>>>> lookup
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> we
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> manage.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This should eliminate the need for other component sets to
> >>> >>>>> try
> >>> >>>>>>> to
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the defaults.css from Basic.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You may find that text that once looked nice now is 16px
> >>> >>>>> Serif.
> >>> >>>>>>>>> That's
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> because we are no longer using inheritance to set the
> >>> >>>>>>> font-family
> >>> >>>>>>>>> on
> >>> >>>>>>>>> all
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> components.  The browsers do not seem to deploy a default
> >>> >>>>>>>>> font-family
> >>> >>>>>>>>> so
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the SWF side shouldn't either.  IOW, if you just put some
> >>> >>>>> plain
> >>> >>>>>>>>> text
> >>> >>>>>>>>> in
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> an
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> HTML file it shows up as 16px Serif.  If you see 16px
> >>>Serif,
> >>> >>>>>>> let us
> >>> >>>>>>>>> know
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> which component is showing that by default.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> However, we don't really want to make 16px Serif the
> >>>default
> >>> >>>>>>> font
> >>> >>>>>>>>> in
> >>> >>>>>>>>> our
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> examples, so I created a CSS-based theme in
> >>> >>>>>>> themes/Basic/basic.css
> >>> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> put
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 12px Sans-Serif as the default for a bunch of type
> >>>selectors
> >>> >>>>>>> since
> >>> >>>>>>>>> that
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> was what our examples were using.  I did not create a
> >>>default
> >>> >>>>>>> font
> >>> >>>>>>>>> for
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Application as that would become the default for other
> >>> >>>>> component
> >>> >>>>>>>>> sets
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> mixed into a Royale app unless otherwise specified.
> >>> >>>>> Component
> >>> >>>>>>> sets
> >>> >>>>>>>>> with
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> different looks can use a different theme and get
> >>>different
> >>> >>>>>>>>> defaults.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So, in sum, without any theme, we want the SWF side to
> >>>look
> >>> >>>>> like
> >>> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> browser and have 16px Serif.  But the royale-config.xml
> >>>will
> >>> >>>>>>>>> specify
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> themes/Basic/basic.css as the default theme giving the
> >>> >>>>> examples
> >>> >>>>>>> and
> >>> >>>>>>>>> most
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> people's unstyled apps a more Flex-like look by using
> >>> >>>>>>> sans-serif.
> >>> >>>>>>>>> More
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> type selectors may need to be added to
> >>> >>>>> themes/Basic/basic.css in
> >>> >>>>>>>>> order
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> get sans serif everywhere by default without putting
> >>> >>>>>>> font-family on
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Application.  That way, when you switch to another theme,
> >>> >>>>> like
> >>> >>>>>>> the
> >>> >>>>>>>>> Vivid
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> that Carlos is working on, there should be fewer, if any,
> >>> >>>>>>> default
> >>> >>>>>>>>> values
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> that screw up the other theme.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> 7C5807444789504e2f3d8c08d5
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> 79d46f81%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> 7C636548875665083262&s
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> data=MjSAbOXuFPTLeafKWOYuDDbc8oMn4YbsZ6pzwxYA6pg%3D&
> >>> reserved=0
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>> >>>>>>>>> Andrew Wetmore
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> >>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14
> >>> >>>>>>>>> .blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>> >>>>>>> 7Cc2d5d47c21084996345c
> >>> >>>>>>>>> 08d57a0b4647%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>> >>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636549111204032
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>767&sdata=5DOBst1ytHpKOuKlMicXtNr8AfJuWiEbXpk%
> >>> 2BmvUspLw%3D&reserved=
> >>> >>>>>>>0
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> --
> >>> >>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira
> >>> >>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> >>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> >>> >>>>>>>> Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>> >>>>>>> 7Cc2d5d47c21084996345c08d5
> >>> >>>>>>>> 7a0b4647%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>> >>>>>>> 7C636549111204032767&s
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>>data=y64W72CO7WgyBNYCVAKpczGJaisl3vwuCu00%2FWx1sVA%3D&reserved=0
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> --
> >>> >>>>>> Carlos Rovira
> >>> >>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> >>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> >>> >>>>>> Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>> >>>>> 7C16c51d3899b54f56d1fb08d5
> >>> >>>>>> 7a12f462%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>> >>>>> 7C636549144184428545&s
> >>> >>>>>> data=9atjDHHuhnuufVBQPZuUzM8vf30vf9Q0CP81XX8bXkg%3D&reserved=0
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> --
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Patreon:
> >>> >>>> *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >>> >>>> eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>> >>> 7C11a52efaa6da4f
> >>> >>>> e5a00c08d57a1a1c94%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>> >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365491749
> >>> >>>> 23040063&sdata=7%2F1v%2FiuUD7JOZJD87HPTozZD972I8SLrn
> >>> >>> q5bGZRkKbc%3D&reserved
> >>> >>>> =0
> >>> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >>> >>>> eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>> >>> 7C11a52efaa6da4f
> >>> >>>> e5a00c08d57a1a1c94%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>> >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365491749
> >>> >>>> 23040063&sdata=7%2F1v%2FiuUD7JOZJD87HPTozZD972I8SLrn
> >>> >>> q5bGZRkKbc%3D&reserved
> >>> >>>> =0>*
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Patreon:
> >>> >>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%
> >>> 3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >>> %7Caaee947095b2
> >>> >>46b08a6908d57a1c7616%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%
> >>> 7C0%7C0%7C6365491
> >>> >>85020033040&sdata=Tlqm35Kweb5G0sbkEWDvd21YZ7sajeK8P4u9c%
> >>> 2B5luSQ%3D&reserv
> >>> >>ed=0
> >>> >>
> >>> >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%
> >>> 3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >>> %7Caaee947095b2
> >>> >>46b08a6908d57a1c7616%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%
> >>> 7C0%7C0%7C6365491
> >>> >>85020033040&sdata=Tlqm35Kweb5G0sbkEWDvd21YZ7sajeK8P4u9c%
> >>> 2B5luSQ%3D&reserv
> >>> >>ed=0>*
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >> Patreon:
> >>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7C9443687ba088
> >>4b97efb808d57a2d6183%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365492
> >>57694381614&sdata=KS5AO15LOFRPIj9fpbfJ3AMxvs%
> 2Font7UtmHeGt%2F68TY%3D&rese
> >>rved=0
> >>
> >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7C9443687ba088
> >>4b97efb808d57a2d6183%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365492
> >>57694381614&sdata=KS5AO15LOFRPIj9fpbfJ3AMxvs%
> 2Font7UtmHeGt%2F68TY%3D&rese
> >>rved=0>*
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >Patreon:
> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C9443687ba0884b
> >97efb808d57a2d6183%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365492576
> >94381614&sdata=KS5AO15LOFRPIj9fpbfJ3AMxvs%2Font7UtmHeGt%2F68TY%3D&
> reserved
> >=0
> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C9443687ba0884b
> >97efb808d57a2d6183%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365492576
> >94381614&sdata=KS5AO15LOFRPIj9fpbfJ3AMxvs%2Font7UtmHeGt%2F68TY%3D&
> reserved
> >=0>*
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to