Ahh..Ok I remember you were working with such flow, by using later
distribution in the IDE. Got it!

2018-02-25 20:23 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>:

> Hi Carlos,
>
> flex-sdk-description as far as I know is for compatibility with older
> IDEs. As for the format of the royale-sdk-description there were discussion
> on the dev list about that some time ago. Josh is parsing exactly this file
> and use output-targets as far as a I know. I'm doing the same in Moonshine.
>
> Yep Maven distribution is broken and I have to found time to fix that. It
> doesn't have to big priority for me. Why do you want to use it ?
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
>
> 2018-02-25 20:16 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> something broke maven royale distribution. When I run:
>>
>> macbookpro:royale-asjs carlosrovira$ mvn -s settings-template.xml
>> -DdistributionTargetFolder=/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/sd
>> ks/apache-royale-0.9.2-SNAPSHOT
>> -P build-distribution clean install
>>
>> This executes ok, but the SDK created is no longer valid.
>>
>> In vscode this is message when this SDK is selected: nextgenas.sdk.editor
>> in settings does not point to a valid SDK. Requires Apache Royale 0.9.0 or
>> newer.
>>
>> But, if I download current 0.9.1 release from here:
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.1/binaries/
>> apache-royale-0.9.1-bin-js-swf.zip
>>
>> The result is exactly the same when point to "0.9.1/royale-asjs" folder
>> (that VSCode offers as a possible valid SDK, the distribution SDK is as
>> well offered as a possible valid SDK)
>>
>> Another thing I don't understand is that I see "flex-sdk-description.xml"
>> and "royale-sdk-description.xml" (why we have both? the first one should
>> be
>> removed?)
>>
>> first one is:
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0"?>
>> <!--
>>
>>   Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
>>   contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
>>   this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
>>   The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
>>   (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
>>   the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
>>
>>       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>>
>>   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>>   distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>>   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
>>   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>>   limitations under the License.
>>
>> -->
>> <flex-sdk-description>
>> <name>Apache Royale 0.9.1 FP11.1 AIR14.0 en_US</name>
>> <version>4.14.1</version>
>> <build>20180208</build>
>> </flex-sdk-description>
>>
>> second one is
>>
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0"?>
>> <!--
>>
>>   Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
>>   contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
>>   this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
>>   The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
>>   (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
>>   the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
>>
>>       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>>
>>   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>>   distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>>   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
>>   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>>   limitations under the License.
>>
>> -->
>> <royale-sdk-description>
>> <name>Apache Royale</name>
>> <version>0.9.1</version>
>> <build>20180208</build>
>>
>> *<output-targets>*
>> *    <output-target name="js" version="Ecma5Strict" />*
>> *    <output-target name="swf" version="AS3" AIR="14.0" Flash="11.1" />*
>> *</output-targets>*
>> </royale-sdk-description>
>>
>>
>> the last part "outputs-targets" seems strange to me.. how IDEs do with
>> this? what should do VSCode?
>>
>> For me, right now VSCode can handle official 0.9.1 and the same happens to
>> maven distribution 0.9.2-SNAPSHOT
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to