I would also not go with the assumption that Grid will/can replace Flex box. It's just different system for layouts. They can both work well together. IMO we didn't even get out all possibilities of Flex Box, so getting on board Grid is a lot of work. I was thinking during my work on website to create some set of layouts which utilize Flex Box, but it ends up that easier to me was just create css class.
Thanks, Piotr 2018-02-26 9:31 GMT+01:00 Harbs <[email protected]>: > Yes. Grid is better than Flexbox for most things, but going with grid > really depends on what browsers we’re supporting. > > IE 10 and 11 do support grid, but their support for grid is based on an > old spec. Edge got support for grid only recently. > > https://rachelandrew.co.uk/archives/2016/11/26/should-i-try-to-use-the-ie- > implementation-of-css-grid-layout/ <https://rachelandrew.co.uk/ > archives/2016/11/26/should-i-try-to-use-the-ie-implementation-of-css-grid- > layout/> > https://gridbyexample.com/browsers/ <https://gridbyexample.com/browsers/> > > > On Feb 26, 2018, at 9:43 AM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > two things here: > > > > 1) while reading about css layouts seems Grid system is the most > > sophisticated one and is better than flexbox, so I think we should change > > to that since flex box does not support some layouts and Grid seems the > > future and more like what we had in flex > > > > 2) yesterday making a simple blog example I put a vertical layout in a > view > > and a simple Js:button in SWF version button gets all the horizontal > space > > while in js is not affected. I think this differences must be removed > since > > if we post some example with both versions, both must be visuals equal > (as > > much as we can), but this difference is huge > > > > > > 2018-02-26 6:39 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Time for another refactoring of layout. My goal for this round is to > move > >> the border/padding/margin calculations into the ValuesManager, and get > the > >> JS version to use getComputedStyle. I think it will be cleaner to > >> abstract the differences between SWF and JS in the ValuesManager and > allow > >> for different IValuesImpls to have different levels of sophistication > for > >> SWF. > >> > >> Right now, our "FlexibleChild" layouts are not factoring in margins > >> correctly. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> -Alex > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
