OK, I just pushed a change for this in vivid-ui-set branch. It seemed to work for me.
HTH, -Alex On 2/25/18, 4:23 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Alex >I think this is perfect >Go with it >Thanks! > >El El dom, 25 feb 2018 a las 9:37, Alex Harui <[email protected]> >escribió: > >> OK, just be certain, the compiler will only do this for a folder >> specifically named "assets". Not every file in the SWC or other folder >> names. And the destination folder will be "assets" as well. >> >> Everybody ok with that for now? >> -Alex >> >> On 2/24/18, 11:44 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos >>Rovira" >> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Hi Alex, >> > >> >2018-02-25 0:12 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >> >> >> Any objections to copying EVERY file out of the assets folder? >> >> >> > >> >I think that's completely fine. We should think that a SWC theme should >> >have only files that are completely needed by the SWF. If not is a >>task of >> >the creator to clean it for production. In Flex all was copied and >> >developers need to do (or not ) maintenance task of removing what's not >> >needed anymore. >> > >> >But the compiler must do that, since the other option seems like a bug >>to >> >me. >> > >> >thanks >> > >> > >> >-- >> >Carlos Rovira >> > >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me% >>2 >> >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >> %7C750dc1559e0d475e935608d5 >> >>>7c23a2ac%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636551414881836753 >>>&s >> >data=g64PoGq2CMoNxS8xL64fL6L77FMFaIOGwWkkn1w2wJk%3D&reserved=0 >> >> -- >Carlos Rovira >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2 >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C18b9a91b3de74b5bcd3108d5 >7c4a9a28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636551582253339763&s >data=3Xrz9OKJOTPoNuL%2FeDWQqXLEfHmEzBBrrk%2BE5%2F1jip8%3D&reserved=0
