Hi -

So, I’m working on this.

I did an ant all as a first step. That works fine. Now I am doing a ‘mvn clean 
install’ which absent documentation would be an expected thing to do. I am 
running into Rat Check errors! Something is wrong with how these have been 
setup.

First I had trouble with swfobject.js which has an MIT license but not in a 
form that RAT recognizes. Reasonable to exclude.

Second I have trouble with framework and here we have five errors. Two of these 
come from a third party in/flat-ui_2_2.zip - they aren’t directly our project 
but we are scanning for licenses? The other three are “*.ser” for local, 
windows and macOS fonts.

So, I’m down this rabbit hole. Any thoughts? Any instructions for Maven?

Regards,
Dave

> On Mar 21, 2018, at 8:21 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> Thanks for doing this.  Your analysis is correct, however, you don't have to 
> worry about Royale-compiler for now unless you want to.  We are not currently 
> using the Royale-compiler scripts to create artifacts, only royale-asjs.  As 
> you guessed, changing only the develop branch in royale-asjs should be 
> sufficient.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Alex
> 
> From: Dave Fisher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Reply-To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 at 7:03 AM
> To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Change Planning for correct sha512 checksum files
> 
> Hi -
> 
> I’ve done an analysis of the source code and build scripts for the proper 
> change for sha512 checksums and extensions.
> 
>  *   Changes appear to be limited to Royale-asjs and Royale-compiler. Is this 
> correct? In asjs the extension is currently SHA-512 and in compiler it is 
> still MD5. The result will be that all artifacts will have SHA-512 with an 
> sha512 extension.
>  *   What branches should I change? Develop?
>  *   In asjs changes need to be made to build.xml, ApproveRoyale.xml, and 
> releasecandidate.xml?
>  *   In compiler changes need to be made to build.xml and ApproveFalcon.xml?
>  *   In compiler no changes for dependencies are required in any of the 
> download.xml at this time. Changes may be needed later should we upgrade an 
> Apache dependency that will no longer have a MD5.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to