Hi Piotr,

What kinds of impact are you concerned about?  I think Jewel should be 
independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the default look 
for MXRoyale some day.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Hi Alex,
    
    I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may affect build,
    for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
    
    Thanks,
    Piotr
    
    2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>:
    
    > Hi Alex,
    >
    > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>:
    >
    > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
    > >
    > >
    > yep! :)))
    >
    >
    > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the MXRoyale branch.
    > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a release.  We
    > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in MXRoyale since
    > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in MXRoyale will
    > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
    > >
    > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we should
    > release
    > > what we have.  It shouldn't have impact on other component sets.  What 
do
    > > others think?
    > >
    >
    > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale, but I think
    > is a good time
    > to see what will be merged
    >
    >
    >
    > >
    > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to create a 
common
    > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel.  Or it could
    > > wait until next month.
    > >
    >
    > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes stuff, we
    > should consider to remove "themes"
    > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same way as
    > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build royale-asjs).
    > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build themes
    > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
    >
    > Regarding  to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I think this
    > should not stop these release, since is something internal
    > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my plate and
    > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
    >
    > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
    >
    > thanks
    >
    > Carlos
    >
    >
    >
    > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
    > >
    > > Thoughts?
    > > -Alex
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Carlos Rovira
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEcDpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
    >
    
    
    
    -- 
    
    Piotr Zarzycki
    
    Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
    
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0>*
    

Reply via email to