Om, Alex,

I'm done for 0.9.3 with this changes, are you still planning on make a
release this days?

closing for today.

thanks

Carlos

2018-04-24 17:19 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>:

> Hi,
>
> I'm going to take advantage that the release has not yet been created to
> make this refactor so 0.9.3 comes with this names correctly, hope to have
> it in the next few hours
>
>
> 2018-04-21 9:04 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thinking in release 0.9.3 I believe I could make some changes to make the
>> Jewel API more user ready, since release is what we expect final users will
>> try and it's a good time to make this kind of changes. Regarding Jewel I
>> see the following issues:
>>
>> * Button: I think people will find more familiar to deal with <j:Button/>
>> than with <j:TextButton>. Maybe in Basic Button can have more sense, but I
>> don't see it in Jewel, so I thinking in removing actual Button and rename
>> TextButton to Button. After 0.9.3 I expect to complete Button with more
>> needs like ability to handle icons (I suppose this will be a bead), make an
>> "outline" style, and handle sizes (large, medium, small,...). If you think
>> in some more needs let me know to add to this TODO (but after 0.9.3)
>>
>> * TextField: I find "TextInput" will be a better name, since that will
>> match flex name and I think is more appropiate.
>>
>> I think this will improve people coming from flex, and make the API more
>> friendly for users
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to