HI Harbs 2018-05-10 11:22 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
> Maybe I missed it, but I’m not sure what you are referring to. Maybe a > quick recap is in order. > > Please explain the following: > 1. What is the advantage of removing the Basic library swc as a dependency > from component sets? > This was fully explained, please, revisit the thread, since I give different responses some time repeating itself. The last one just few minutes ago responding all this threads > 2. What (if anything) is the advantage of changing package names? > My intention here was to put things in "core". This could be a wrong decision, due to all of you don't want to change references in you final applications, but as refactor I think is ok to have Core classes in "core" package, and not a mixture of things in Core and Basic where some are in "core" and others are in "html", what seems completely wrong and very confusing. I changed some to the old namespace to try to help in that, but seems nothing of this serves. > > Thanks, > Harbs > > > On May 10, 2018, at 12:17 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Through this thread I exposed lots of technical advantages. I think I > > should not express once again all said > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
