The only reasons I seem to have seen are: 1. A philosophical opposition to having Basic as a dependency. 2. Not wanting Basic CSS included in a Jewel project.
Unless I’m missing something, #1 I simply disagree with. #2 sounds like a valid argument, but it seems to me more like something which needs to be fixed in the compiler. CSS not used by an app should not be included and I think we need a way of avoiding typename conflicts between component sets. Are there other arguments which I missed? Since Carlos does not seem to want to explain himself again, I’m asking others on the list: Do others understand why Carlos feels the refactor is important? Thanks, Harbs > On May 10, 2018, at 1:32 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Can we please keep this discussion about the technical reasons for a >> refactor and whether or not it’s the right thing to do? If you have strong >> technical reasons why Basic should not be a dependency please explain them. >> > > Harbs, I'll explained lots of time, and you keep ask the same. What did you > not understand of the things I expressed so many time?
