I’m glad to hear it. There is a lot of text in your email, and I need the time to read it properly and address the points. I hope to do that tomorrow. I think there is still some unclarity on some of the points (both ways).
I’m glad the discussion is back on track. I would like to just say that I (and I think others) have really been trying to understand the motivation the whole time. We have been trying to clarify the technical motivations (for and against) and getting to the point where we all understand each other. The perceived tone might be different, but I’m not projecting anything different than what I meant to project the entire time. I am taking more care with my words and I’m making every attempt to use Greg’s rule about not using pronouns. It seems to be working well… ;-) More tomorrow. Best, Harbs > On May 13, 2018, at 10:02 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote: > > I said about to make a vote thread, since I was not hearing many things in > favor of my work, but reading your email, Om, and other feedback, I think > we are moving to a really different scenario. This is more a community > discussion, with a really different tone, so if you (and others) finally > doesn't want to vote, for me will be ok. I was only doing since seems what > all of you demand at that point.
