Hi Harbs, 2018-05-18 13:23 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
> A couple of questions/comments: > > > On May 18, 2018, at 1:57 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > One more important technical thing about that way is "verbosity" since > each > > time you reference that kind of class you are introducing a name that use > > to be 2-3 time longer, each time. > > Are you suggesting this has performance implications? I would not have > thought that class name length effects performance. If you have a source > that it does, I’d be interested in hearing details. > No, in that point I'm talking exclusively about size, not performance here. > > > "My suggestion with meta-data was a way to enable the second option. It > > does not need to be specifically meta-tags. It could be something like > this > > as well: > > > > /** > > * royaleclassselector RadioButton > > * royaleclassprefix basic > > * royaleinheritsbaseselector > > */ > > " > > I still prefers the [] format since is more concise and I think is more > > suited for this particular purpose. > > I agree that the bracketed format is “prettier”, but I could live with > either. > Right, since I was talking that Metadata in this concrete use will not have performance problems like Alex suggested, and you propose this other way due to the possible performance problems, I think is better to return to normal metadata discussion. -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
