Hi Om, there's many changes since 0.9.2, so I was thinking the same as you. We don't need to go to 0.9.4, we can skip to 0.9.5 or as you say, 0.10.0
thanks 2018-05-26 15:20 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>: > I just remembered that we have already pushed a 0.9.3 release to npm. We > will not be able to re release that version. Perhaps we just skip to 0.9.4 > version next? > > Or even 0.10.0? > > Thanks, > Om > > On Sat, May 26, 2018, 12:17 AM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Thanks Alex, > > > > I committed as well some poms that needed change from 0.9.4 to 0.9.3 > > snapshot. We'll need to check why this ones are not update to the new > > version when doing a prepare release. > > > > I'll try as well to summarize briefly the discussion about reorganization > > so people could check easily the main points of what we are discussing, > > hope that helps to take decisions and go forward > > > > Thanks > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > 2018-05-25 21:37 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > > > > > In case folks are wondering, I deleted the release/0.9.3 branches from > > all > > > 3 repos. There have been changes made in each of the branches since > the > > > branches were cut and there were also issues with the royale-compiler > and > > > royale-typedefs branches not having synced version numbers to their > > develop > > > branches. > > > > > > I see a vote thread opened today on Maven's lists for the SCM plug in. > > > > > > AIUI, we are on hold for a release unless we get general consensus to > > what > > > commit hash to release from for royale-asjs. > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 5/17/18, 3:02 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos > > > Rovira" <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > The minimun change is to see package names change. > > > Take into account that all is building and working ok. Only we have > > > problems in jsonly build since is only depends on ANT (what I think > > is > > > not > > > good, since is missing maven build), in > > "/mustella/tests/basicTests/". > > > Looking at what's happening in that part will solve the build. > > > > > > 2018-05-17 11:40 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > You are right. I missed this. > > > > > > > > What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work? > > > > > > > > > On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira < > > > carlosrov...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I think you missed one important point I > > > > > posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are > > using > > > the > > > > > actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 > > > without all > > > > > that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we > have: > > > > > > > > > > "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. > > Jewel > > > will > > > > be > > > > > available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the > > > meanwhile > > > > you > > > > > can find it in the develop branch." > > > > > > > > > > and the code is tailored with the actual api. > > > > > > > > > > For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it > can > > > ship > > > > with > > > > > all that we are promising in website and social networks for > the > > > latest 2 > > > > > months. I think this is crucial. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > % > > > 7C9a61c338f4554b04aa9008d5bbdd5762%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636621481721528268&sdata=6FoSfupJoaFpfsqJcJ7HtHNpRoQluG > > > Uzh6hlM21AH20%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
