Forgot to share the info in Github page :)

https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Apache-Royale-communication-with-AMF-and-RemoteObject

2018-05-31 20:49 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>:

> Hi,
>
> I get Royale working with BlazeDS. People using BlazeDS should be able to
> finally start developing with Royale now! :)
>
> Right now I'm test it with both the SampleAmfWebApp (in our repo) and with
> my own backend (real flex/java app), and seems to work in both.
>
> Things to have into account: While "clientId" is now working (we send the
> required PING command, get the DSId and store it for later communication),
> we need to use it with small messages turned off (blazeds turn it on by
> default).
>
> This is the configuration per channel:
>
> <channel-definition ...>
> <properties>
> <serialization>
> <enable-small-messages>false</enable-small-messages>
> </serialization>
>
> I think small messages are only something that will make our
> implementation shine, but really is not required. I think that will improve
> a bit over the normal message size. If you use as well the
> CompressedRemoteObject, that will be a killer communication! :)
>
> About small messages, I'm trying to get it work, I uploaded the work
> currently done, but still needs more to get it fully working.
>
> As well I uploaded a SimpleRemoteObject that is a simpler version that
> should work with AMF backends that require less things like AMFPHP. As I
> don't use AMFPHP since many years I can say too much about it, but hope
> others will use and report if something more is needed (The same for other
> AMF implementations in other technologies).
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to