Hi Alex, Piotr, I merged few latest changes and I did and try integration branch. Maven build pass localy wich is good! :) But unfortunately some things are not right and Jewel Example doesn't work. Don't know about MXRoyale, that Alex can report if changes work or not.
Some of the problems are the changes did in TBodyContentArea and the classes to add, remove data, but problems seems to go far from there. I started to comment "sections" in Jewel example to avoid runtime errors, and have to comment TablePlayGround and since DateChooser uses Table I had to comment DateComponentsPlayGround With this JewelExample runs without errors but Drawer Navigation doesn't shows any option, but no errors are displayed at runtime. So I added in browser code "is-active" class to sections I want to display to try other parts of Jewel and found that List based components are not rendering item renderers (List, ComboBox,...) or bindings are not working, or something is bad when trying to add the items to the component. As Alex said the problem can be that things in develop can't be the latest, if for example DataGroup has changed in MXRoyale and Jewel needs to be adapted to that changes we need to know what changes are but I don't think changing the code "blindly" will solve the problem. I think we should check point each commit to see where are the hot points and fix them. I still need to fix some important things for release in develop, so I'll be busy today and maybe tomorrow. With that done I can concentrate in help with the release. Piotr, if you can discover the points of conflict and can share here will be great, you can try to fix the problems, but test that changes work in Jewel Example, other way is to share it here and I can try to fix it or help you to fix it. Thanks Carlos El sáb., 1 sept. 2018 a las 1:00, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>) escribió: > Please remember that an integration branch contains changes from two > branches and when files get moved around, it is possible for changes to get > out of sync. What is in the develop branch may not be the "latest". > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 8/31/18, 8:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I just merged to that branch latest changes from develop. Once you > finish > whatever you are doing, switch there and play with it yourself. There > is > nothing to discuss blindly before you didn't touch that branch. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 17:01 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > napisał(a): > > > Carlos, > > > > I cannot change it because itemRendererParent field is type of > IItemRendererParent > > [1] and that interface doesn't contains that method. Link [1] is > pointing > > to develop branch, but that interfaces looks > > exactly the same in integration branch. > > > > [1] > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FCore%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fcore%2FIItemRendererParent.as&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=O7rT8rBSMYflDORWgzl2V0UVI53FYHS%2BtalqjofG6qY%3D&reserved=0 > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 16:19 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > > napisał(a): > > > >> Piotr, > >> what I'm saying is that the whole fiel is created by me, and you > have a > >> line of code that is different to what I have in develop. So > something is > >> wrong in the merge to the integration branch. The line of code I'm > posting > >> is the right one and the one you should have in the integration > branch. > >> > >> I'm still on develop fixing the 4 things I commented. When I finish > I'll > >> be > >> trying the integration branch. In the mean while, since that line > is not > >> right, can you change it for the one I posted?, If not when I reach > to the > >> integration branch I'll change it myself > >> > >> thanks > >> > >> Carlos > >> > >> > >> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 15:43, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> > >> > Carlos, > >> > > >> > Are you using this branch ? > >> > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Ftree%2Ffeature%2FMerge_MXRoyale_To_Develop&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=CEGPY7%2FfhU1H%2FioYlqcriKBxV9xKr2kpX08VlAu8dfU%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > >> > > >> > Above branch need to be tested and my previous link pointing to > sources > >> > from that branch. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Piotr > >> > > >> > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:39 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> > napisał(a): > >> > > >> > > Hi Piotr, > >> > > > >> > > I don't have that line: > >> > > > >> > > itemRendererParent.removeItemRenderer(processedRow); > >> > > > >> > > I have this in develop: > >> > > > >> > > itemRendererParent.removeElement(processedRow); > >> > > > >> > > How is this possible? is very strange :? > >> > > > >> > > The item renderer is removed in the loop, the last line is to > remove > >> the > >> > > row (tr) element from the itemRendererParent (tbody) > >> > > > >> > > Can you change to this > >> itemRendererParent.removeElement(processedRow); ? > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 15:31, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> > > > >> > > > No this is not that line. That's the next one which is > commented > >> right > >> > > now. > >> > > > [1]. Uncomment line to see error. Maven is failing with error > which > >> is > >> > > > valid[2] > >> > > > > >> > > > [1] > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fed55aee86e92d36397a52cffd44df1fa56393c5f%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FJewel%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fjewel%2Fbeads%2FitemRenderers%2FRemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData.as%23L135&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=QBETEI7kExsyHGiHJXFFlej1kU3vL7hA1FzQ0Vgf3IE%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > [2] > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F8mlQ&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=mp1oXWwCOZl1%2Fub5W86UW73mUdI7ChRjFpQOIeIociU%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > > > Piotr > >> > > > > >> > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:23 Carlos Rovira < > carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> > > > napisał(a): > >> > > > > >> > > > > Piotr, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > let me see if I understand the problem. That line: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > itemRendererParent.removeItemRenderer(ir); > >> > > > > > >> > > > > is making compilation fail? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > That would be very strange since my compilation succeeded. > and > >> seems > >> > > the > >> > > > > line is ok. If so it could be a similar problem to the one > we saw > >> > > > recently > >> > > > > in witch compilation was ok localy but failing in the > server. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Let me know about this problem to see what I should take > care > >> > > > > > >> > > > > thanks! > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Carlos > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 15:13, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Carlos, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Ok understand. Thanks for explanation. If you could look > into > >> that > >> > > how > >> > > > to > >> > > > > > achieve that without build fail that would be great. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Piotr > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 15:11 Carlos Rovira < > carlosrov...@apache.org > >> > > >> > > > > > napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Piotr, > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Table component uses TBodyContentArea as IContentView > instead > >> of > >> > > > > > DataGroup, > >> > > > > > > so the IItemRendererParent needs its own implementation. > >> > > > > > > Inside TBody(<tbody>), we have each item render as a > TableRow > >> > > (<tr>), > >> > > > > > that > >> > > > > > > has inside a TableCell (<td>) and then the > TableItemRenderer. > >> > > > > > > So when adding, removing, and so on from the > dataProvider to > >> > manage > >> > > > the > >> > > > > > > item renderers you need to create or destroy this > structure. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > So if you see the code, you'll that I'm removing the > cells > >> inside > >> > > the > >> > > > > row > >> > > > > > > and the itemrender inside the cell so signaling the > >> appropriate > >> > > > removal > >> > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > listeners. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hope this explanation solve your doubt > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > thanks > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Carlos > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 12:50, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Carlos, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Question to one of your class. Why are you doing two > times > >> > > removing > >> > > > > [1] > >> > > > > > > and > >> > > > > > > > couple of lines later you are doing removeElement ? It > >> > shouldn't > >> > > > > event > >> > > > > > > work > >> > > > > > > > because there is no method removeElement in that > interface. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > [1] > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2F62265d52abdf34f797dc7582841ed029d8fb0cff%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FJewel%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fjewel%2Fbeads%2FitemRenderers%2FRemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData.as%23L131&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=74MQ4rWiYDlL%2F0kAENWTKN713DmC4X5HVYFe2OGbeC4%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 12:18 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com > > > >> > > napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > That change should be reverted. I added it to try > and fix > >> an > >> > > > issue > >> > > > > > with > >> > > > > > > > > Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with Basic > >> columns. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < > >> > > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi Harbs, > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Some time ago you have added interface > >> IDataGridColumnList > >> > > [1]. > >> > > > > It > >> > > > > > is > >> > > > > > > > > used > >> > > > > > > > > > here [2], couple of lines later there is > assignment > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer; > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer > property > >> and > >> > > build > >> > > > > is > >> > > > > > > > > > failing - locally. How actually it is working ? > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > [1] > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FBasic%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fhtml%2FsupportClasses%2FIDataGridColumnList.as&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=GxUmxFOCOhRUaE2U1LvCTLbCMK2jlK1wzU846W9CRKI%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > < > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FBasic%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fhtml%2FsupportClasses%2FIDataGridColumnList.as&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=GxUmxFOCOhRUaE2U1LvCTLbCMK2jlK1wzU846W9CRKI%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > [2] > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2F75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FBasic%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fhtml%2Fbeads%2FDataGridView.as%23L229&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=nmPWpzQOu1GRZ3g%2B3pOcYk%2FmW0YHuPD6yoysIPay%2F7k%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > < > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2F75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FBasic%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fhtml%2Fbeads%2FDataGridView.as%23L229&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=nmPWpzQOu1GRZ3g%2B3pOcYk%2FmW0YHuPD6yoysIPay%2F7k%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > > Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira < > >> > > > carlosrov...@apache.org > >> > > > > > > > <mailto: > >> > > > > > > > > carlosrov...@apache.org>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Piotr, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> for me its ok, but only want to point something > >> > important. I > >> > > > > think > >> > > > > > > we > >> > > > > > > > > all > >> > > > > > > > > >> invested many emails, hours in discussing about > this. I > >> > > think > >> > > > > all > >> > > > > > > > > positions > >> > > > > > > > > >> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to > bring to > >> > the > >> > > > > plate > >> > > > > > > are > >> > > > > > > > > new, > >> > > > > > > > > >> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is > that we > >> all > >> > > can > >> > > > > get > >> > > > > > > > what > >> > > > > > > > > we > >> > > > > > > > > >> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) > jewel > >> can't > >> > > > link > >> > > > > > > basic, > >> > > > > > > > > so > >> > > > > > > > > >> it must create it's own versions. In case this > could > >> not > >> > be > >> > > > > > > possible, > >> > > > > > > > > >> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience > creating > >> > Jewel > >> > > > > > versions > >> > > > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > > > >> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and > >> DropDownList > >> > > show > >> > > > > > that I > >> > > > > > > > > was in > >> > > > > > > > > >> the right track, since the things I copied are > modified > >> > for > >> > > > > Jewel > >> > > > > > > > since > >> > > > > > > > > >> Jewel needs other things and implementations. In > Basic > >> > > there's > >> > > > > too > >> > > > > > > > much > >> > > > > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > > > >> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code > and that > >> > > means > >> > > > > that > >> > > > > > > > this > >> > > > > > > > > >> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic > piece > >> of > >> > > code > >> > > > > that > >> > > > > > > > > could be > >> > > > > > > > > >> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic UI, > TLCs > >> and > >> > > CSS > >> > > > > > don't > >> > > > > > > > > want to > >> > > > > > > > > >> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it > will need > >> to > >> > > deal > >> > > > > > with > >> > > > > > > > > those > >> > > > > > > > > >> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework > code > >> > should > >> > > > help > >> > > > > > you > >> > > > > > > > to > >> > > > > > > > > put > >> > > > > > > > > >> the Pilars of other high level things without > the need > >> of > >> > > > > looking > >> > > > > > > how > >> > > > > > > > to > >> > > > > > > > > >> workaround many things set up, this is what I > find in > >> > Basic > >> > > > code > >> > > > > > > when > >> > > > > > > > > >> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if > things > >> could > >> > be > >> > > > > > change > >> > > > > > > in > >> > > > > > > > > >> Basic for the better, but seems that many people > here > >> > things > >> > > > > that > >> > > > > > > > Basic > >> > > > > > > > > is > >> > > > > > > > > >> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, > (I at > >> > > least), > >> > > > > can > >> > > > > > > use > >> > > > > > > > > it. > >> > > > > > > > > >> And Jewel can't use. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> Don't see other way. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> Let's see this as we end this release. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> Carlos > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr Zarzycki > (< > >> > > > > > > > > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) > >> > > > > > > > > >> escribió: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Hi Carlos, > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Please do not move anything more. I think I had > enough > >> > > > problems > >> > > > > > > with > >> > > > > > > > > >>> current situations. I will deal with all of > that as > >> is. > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about > all of > >> that > >> > > > stuff > >> > > > > > > after > >> > > > > > > > > >>> release. > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira < > >> > > > > > > > carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> as we discussed, the package names was the > revert we > >> > said > >> > > to > >> > > > > do, > >> > > > > > > so > >> > > > > > > > > >> when > >> > > > > > > > > >>> we > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be > more > >> > > > consistent. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of > >> DataGroup I > >> > > can > >> > > > > > move > >> > > > > > > it > >> > > > > > > > > >> from > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Let me know if this is ok for you. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> As well let me know if some more class is in > Core to > >> > > > consider. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr > Zarzycki (< > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't > have > >> that > >> > > > > changes, > >> > > > > > > but > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big > headache to > >> > make > >> > > it > >> > > > > > > > working. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all > of that. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui > >> > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale > and > >> merged > >> > > it > >> > > > > into > >> > > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> integration branch. However, the Maven > build in > >> the > >> > > > > > integration > >> > > > > > > > > >>> branch > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> is > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> still failing. It appears to be because > DataGroup > >> got > >> > > > moved > >> > > > > > > from > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Basic > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Core. The Ant build should be failing there > too. > >> I > >> > was > >> > > > > under > >> > > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were > not > >> going > >> > to > >> > > > be > >> > > > > in > >> > > > > > > > this > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> release. Someone else will have to deal with > >> > resolving > >> > > > > these > >> > > > > > > > > >> issues. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure > them > >> out. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> -Alex > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >> > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Great! Thanks Alex! > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui > >> > > > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in > feature/MXRoyale > >> then > >> > you > >> > > > can > >> > > > > > > > > >>> pull > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> those > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> changes into the integration branch. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Alex > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >> > > > > > > > > >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Hi Carlos, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do > you know > >> how > >> > > to > >> > > > > fix > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> that > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> ? > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Probably I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> missed some conflicts, not sure why Maven > >> > > complaining. > >> > > > > :) > >> > > > > > > > > >>> If > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> you > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> won't > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> have > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> time I will look into that tomorrow. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos Rovira < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I switched to the > >> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at > the > >> > begining > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I > fixed it > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method > numItemRenderers > >> in > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> interface > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by > class > >> > DataGroup > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends > >> > ContainerContentArea > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> implements > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ^ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers > in > >> > interface > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends > >> > ContainerContentArea > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> implements > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ^ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > *------------------------------------------------------------------------* > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:* > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent > >> > > > > > > > > >> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> .... > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2.164 s] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> ........................... > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 0.273 s] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> .................... > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.175 s] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> ..................... > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 0.691 s] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: > Core > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> ............... > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *FAILURE* [ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 1.947 s] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: > Binding > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> ............ > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *SKIPPED* > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the > branch was > >> > > > > > > > > >> compiling > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> tested > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts > are still > >> > > > > > > > > >>> unsolved. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale > >> introduced > >> > > > > > > > > >> some > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> MX > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> API > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> that is > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so it > >> needs to > >> > > > > > > > > >> add > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> it. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> For now > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when it > reach > >> > Basic > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> library > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> could be > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, > did you > >> try > >> > > to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> compile with > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> maven > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this > problems? > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something? > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to > operate. I'll > >> > > > > > > > > >> return > >> > > > > > > > > >>> to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> my > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jewel > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> duties > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> in the meanwhile > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks! > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Carlos > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos > Rovira > >> (< > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> ) > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> escribió: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples and > >> report > >> > if > >> > > > > > > > > >> I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> find > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> some > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> isuue. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks! > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr > >> Zarzycki > >> > (< > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release > next > >> version > >> > > > > > > > > >> of > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Royale. One > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of the > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is in > >> MXRoyale > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> branch > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> develop. I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what was > in > >> > MXRoyale > >> > > > > > > > > >>> and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> develop > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> now is > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to > develop I > >> > > > > > > > > >> would > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> like > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> to ask > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> you to > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your > end - > >> > > > > > > > > >> whether I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> didn't > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> break any > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being missed > - > >> please > >> > > > > > > > > >> make > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> changes and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> commit > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> to that branch. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well > and test > >> > some > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> Jewel > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> examples ? > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex > tomorrow to > >> see > >> > > > > > > > > >> what > >> > > > > > > > > >>> is > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> happen. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a > integration > >> > > > > > > > > >>> branch, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> moreover > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> since > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own > way. > >> Then > >> > > > > > > > > >>> solve > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> conflicts in > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> that > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all > is > >> > > > > > > > > >> compiling > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> working > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> fine > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> as > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the > >> integration > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> branch. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :) > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Carlos > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, Alex > Harui > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ) > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> escribió: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root > folders > >> for > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> projects. I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> think > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Agent > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace and > master > >> > > > > > > > > >> may > >> > > > > > > > > >>> be > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> running > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> in > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wherever > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing. In theory, > >> royale-compiler > >> > > > > > > > > >>> and > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> royale-typedefs > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> should be able to be built off > master, and > >> the > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> other > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> builds > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> should > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> be > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> able > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the > results > >> of > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> those > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> builds. If > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> you > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> want > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off master > to the > >> > > > > > > > > >>> agent > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> that's > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> fine as > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> well. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that > would not > >> > > > > > > > > >> run > >> > > > > > > > > >>> on > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> master. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I see failing mustellaresultsparser > [1] > >> [2] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> It's > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> pointing for > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> some > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> reason > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to c:/jenkins/workspace instead > those one > >> in > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Program > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Files. How > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> this > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> path > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is appear there ? What actually is > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> ${env.APPDATA} ? > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *[1] ** > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=JwvLM%2FGP0Bx%2Fr8FYAKCUVnC1tqw3UsbIlUfBk1uYAv4%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=JwvLM%2FGP0Bx%2Fr8FYAKCUVnC1tqw3UsbIlUfBk1uYAv4%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *[2] > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=5EpYO7IJSFREEaBnV2Xi3I948l9SwcO3MNlgU9%2F6gpU%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C03d39a0b3bcf42aaa6e308d60f53a672%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636713249295672168&sdata=5EpYO7IJSFREEaBnV2Xi3I948l9SwcO3MNlgU9%2F6gpU%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks,* > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Piotr* > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:18 Piotr > Zarzycki < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give me some sign here once you > >> > > > > > > > > >> will > >> > > > > > > > > >>> be > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> done > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> with all > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> your > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes! > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:12 Harbs < > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found that there’s an error > with > >> > > > > > > > > >> ACE > >> > > > > > > > > >>>> on > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> multiple > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> machines. > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> was > >> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only able to get it to build by fi -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
