mmm.... "asjs" folder is "royale-asjs" ? If I try to click in VSCode the SDK button (bottom-right) and click then "Add more SDKs to this list..." (button on top of VSCode) and go to "royale-asjs" it's not recognized as a valid SDK. Or are you talking about other asjs folder?
El mar., 4 sept. 2018 a las 12:24, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>) escribió: > I’m not totally sure what you’re asking. > > I have VS Code pointed to my asjs folder. > > The only thing you need to do to make it a valid SDK is copying > playerglobal to frameworks/libs/player/11.1/playerglobal.swc: > > Thanks, > Harbs > > > On Sep 4, 2018, at 1:16 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Harbs, > > > > I suppose you create a SDK from develop to use with VSCode. Do you create > > it with ANT? > > Can you post here how do you build it? > > I guess that we are very near to get a valid SDK build with maven, so if > is > > few time, I'll try to fix this for this release, since I think it could > be > > a good improvement for people trying new release. If I see is not as > easy, > > I'll be dropping for next release. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > El mar., 4 sept. 2018 a las 11:18, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>) > escribió: > > > >> Cool. Thanks. > >> > >> I merged in all new commits in MXRoyale and develop. > >> > >>> On Sep 4, 2018, at 12:05 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Harbs, > >>> > >>> I will start checking tour De Flex in couple of hours. > >>> > >>> I saw yesterday new Pull Requests accepted from Pashmina in MXRoyale > >>> branch. Could make sure that is included in integration branch? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Piotr > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018, 10:23 AM Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> If we’re going to have “compatible sets”, we’re going to need some way > >> of > >>>> organizing them (naming or otherwise) to indicate which sets of > layouts > >> are > >>>> compatible with each other. > >>>> > >>>>> On Sep 4, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> It seems to me that there are going to be incompatible sets of > layouts. > >>>> IOW, if you want to use flexbox, you may have to use flexbox layouts > in > >> all > >>>> parents. And not use percentages in the children (IIRC). And not nest > >>>> flexboxes, etc. > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
