What was wrong with the Base64Encoder/Decoder?

-Alex

On 9/23/18, 11:25 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Hi,
    
    just let you know that IE11 problem wasn't a JSON problem. It was that
    "atob" and "btoa" functions to decode/encode base64 are not available in
    IE11...another IE nightmare...
    I finaly added a Base64 class with static encode and decode functions to
    Core to solve this problem cross platform.
    
    So final I was able to finish the example...
    
    Thanks
    
    Carlos
    
    
    El dom., 23 sept. 2018 a las 17:37, Carlos Rovira 
(<[email protected]>)
    escribió:
    
    > Hi Harbs,
    >
    > thanks! that solves the issue! That's magic! : )
    >
    > I put this only in pom.xml in this example and in JewelExample, since I'll
    > use it as well. But I think I can't enable it in maven globally, or at
    > least don't know how.
    > I think as you that this should be enabled per case, although, it seems
    > that even we, that use mostly AMF instead JSON, will have to use it, so
    > maybe all people using royale, will end using this compiler arg...just 
what
    > I think will happen.
    >
    > About IE11, I'll go with it now, but seems that JSON.parse() has many
    > problems with many functions and people uses polyfill or other JSON
    > implementation to solve it. I'll try that way and I think if that works ok
    > and we want to support IE11 as we said, we'll need to add the polyfill to
    > Royale as we did with other things like Dialog.
    >
    > Thanks!
    >
    >
    > El dom., 23 sept. 2018 a las 11:49, Harbs (<[email protected]>)
    > escribió:
    >
    >> I’m not sure what the problem is with IE11, but the problem with the
    >> release version is minification renaming.
    >>
    >> I just committed a change to the example ant build script to include the
    >> “js-dynamic-access-unknown-members” option (new to 0.9.3). That fixes the
    >> renaming problem.
    >>
    >> You can do something similar for Maven and/or VS Code builds.
    >>
    >> I’m not suggesting that globally enabling this option (like I did) is the
    >> best way to go, but I have limited time today and I wanted to demonstrate
    >> how to use it.
    >>
    >> Good luck,
    >> Harbs
    >>
    >
    > --
    > Carlos Rovira
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf2063785807d44f005d808d62181e980%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636733239179990089&amp;sdata=CJSDVZ6E%2BEnT%2BXbm5O3JFlu6TrOCdZ0A%2BRfRwlqHqJo%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >
    >
    
    -- 
    Carlos Rovira
    
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf2063785807d44f005d808d62181e980%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636733239179990089&amp;sdata=CJSDVZ6E%2BEnT%2BXbm5O3JFlu6TrOCdZ0A%2BRfRwlqHqJo%3D&amp;reserved=0
    

Reply via email to