Hi Alex, after various attempts, I didn't find other way but remove the flexunit flex swc. With this, all is ok. I think we can revisit this with more time to see what's really going on, but my ANT knowledge is limited and maybe is more simple than that
El lun., 1 oct. 2018 a las 18:45, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>) escribió: > Without taking time to look closely, the "better fix" is to explicitly > name the SWC instead of the folder of SWCs. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 10/1/18, 3:12 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to figure the problem when we create an SDK with ANT before > trying to fix Maven distribution to create an SDK. > > The problem: > > When doing "ant all" from royale-asjs folder at some point we get > flexunit > on "in" folder. > Then inside that folder we have ; > > in/flexunit/flexunit/flexunit-4.2.0-20140410-as3_4.12.0.swc > in/flexunit/flexunit/flexunit-4.2.0-20140410-flex_4.12.0.swc. > > I need to remove the second one or ant fails, since the process > require the > classes in as3 version swc > > Don't know how this is working for other people (I think Alex and Harbs > doesn't have any problem at all). > But others like Erik de Bruin or me found the ant process failing. > > So first of all is to know why the process is using one swc or another > in > different environments. I assume this is a problem of configuration at > some > place. > The most easy way, but I think a bit "dirty", is trying to remove flex > swc > with ant as we get inside "in" folder, but I think we should try to > understand why this is happen and try to bring a better fix. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Carlos Rovira > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8dc1d8196a564c56322608d627865864%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636739855300403070&sdata=t1N7aHCwBtSqZKOIJ41h5YKeiVN9SfhIBIH01J2ZZeQ%3D&reserved=0 > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
