ok Alex, I'm fine with it. I'll for it as I have time

El mar., 2 oct. 2018 a las 18:20, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
escribió:

> Hi Carlos,
>
> It is fine to have two different examples.  I don't really care what they
> are called.  Please make sure the Jewel version does not output SWF so it
> is clear there are no expectations that the SWF version will work correctly.
>
> Unless you or other volunteers have the time to get Jewel to work in SWF
> (I did get some functionality working so it didn't just crash), any time
> you want to add Jewel to an example it will be better to fork it and change
> the build configuration so it no longer outputs SWF.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/2/18, 12:56 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     Hi Alex,
>     I think we should duplicate the example so we can have a Basic version
> and
>     a Jewel version. We're publishing examples on social networks and good
>     looking interface in crucial. So if we want both things we only can
> fork
>     and have *RemoteObjectAMFTest* and *RemoteObjectAMFTestJewel* or
>     *RemoteObjectAMFTest* and *RemoteObjectAMFTestBasic*
>     Maybe the later is better since we published the other name as the one
> that
>     uses the good looking interface
>
>     thanks
>
>
>
>     El mar., 2 oct. 2018 a las 2:55, Alex Harui (<[email protected]
> >)
>     escribió:
>
>     > At some point the RemoteObjectAMFTest broke for SWF.  This is rather
>     > annoying as it was a good test bed for debugging the compiler output
> and
>     > comparing the JS code to the SWF code.  One thing that broke it was
>     > upgrading the UI to use Jewel components because Jewel isn't working
> that
>     > well in SWF.  Our examples should work on both SWF and JS with a few
>     > exceptions where the app was designed for JS only, like MDL
> examples.  I'm
>     > tempted to rip the Jewel components out of this example and go back
> to
>     > Basic.
>     >
>     > -Alex
>     >
>     >
>
>     --
>     Carlos Rovira
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C54637ba688a6403e852408d6283c8f1b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636740637896388241&amp;sdata=iLNMMNxKbreKppRqugiCEuEt8d7pslxFq77ntG%2FlgiI%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to