Hi Carlos, I don't think I understand how to make a folder of RB SWCs available to Maven. Don't all Maven dependencies require Maven coordinates in a POM? Or are you suggesting that folks will have to use additionalCompilerOptions in the pom to specify -library-path+=<path to RB SWCs>?
-Alex On 10/16/18, 9:39 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, just let us know that uploading to Maven Central seems a lot of manual work to upload all of the RBs individually. So maybe we should take other way, that could be temporal, and as someone has the time we could go the Maven Central way ( If all thinks is the proper way). I think, for now, as a temporal way, the most easy way is to make a temporal project library and copy there all RBs so it can be available from our project to ANT and MAVEN. Thoughts? El mar., 16 oct. 2018 a las 8:33, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>) escribió: > You can ask Chris if you want. Flex was never made Maven-compatible. > FlexJS/Royale was the first Flex-like SDK to be Maven-compatible. > > -Alex > > On 10/15/18, 10:58 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > it's strange to me that artifacts are not published, I could ask Chris > Dutz > what's the reason and see what is his response about it, and if we can > if > it will be very difficult to do. > I think that seems to be the best way to go. > > > > El mar., 16 oct. 2018 a las 0:34, Alex Harui (<[email protected] > >) > escribió: > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > I do not think Apache Flex or Adobe Flex was ever published as Maven > > artifacts. The link you referenced only seems to reference poms and > not > > binaries. There are no pom.xml files in the Apache Flex repo. > > > > AIUI, there is this thing called a Mavenizer that can take a Flex > SDK and > > generate Maven artifacts. It is in the flex-utilities repo. I > think it > > will put the artifacts in your internal repository, but I don't think > > anyone from Adobe or Apache Flex has ever tried to push those > artifacts to > > Maven Central. I'm not sure what it would take to do that. > > > > So, I'm not sure what the right answer is. > > > > Thanks, > > -Alex > > > > On 10/15/18, 3:20 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > I searched on the nexus hosted inner company, but didn't try to > find it > > outside. I thought Flex SDK was in maven central as well is not > the > > case? > > For example a quick search shows [1] where I see 4.12 and 4.13 > here, > > and I > > suppose those should have the RBs right? > > > > If is not the case, I think can we upload the latest 4.16.1 to > maven > > central? > > > > [1] > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmvnrepository.com%2Fartifact%2Forg.apache.flex.framework%2Fflex-framework&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd5adcf9035e54f7b222c08d63385e822%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636753047558552663&sdata=852mkHDP8i6cgV%2BseTHtBYOUif0WKiFwgBDBQeQg14Q%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 22:57, Alex Harui > > (<[email protected]>) > > escribió: > > > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > > > Where did you get that artifact? I could not find it on Maven > > Central. > > > Maybe you ran the Mavenizer on a Flex SDK? If so, the > question is > > whether > > > we want Maven users to have to use the Mavenizer. > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 10/15/18, 1:38 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > I was looking for maven resoucebundle in maven and we have > > separate > > > artifacts. an example: > > > > > > > > > > > > /org/apache/flex/framework/framework/4.16.0/framework-4.16.0-es_ES.rb.swc > > > > > > So I think it should not be a problem in maven too, and we > can > > reuse > > > from > > > flex :) > > > > > > Best > > > > > > > > > El dom., 14 oct. 2018 a las 23:56, Alex Harui > > > (<[email protected]>) > > > escribió: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I just pushed support for old Flex resource bundles in > > Royale. Some > > > > people migrating old Flex apps will find it more > convenient > > and may > > > even > > > > require that [ResourceBundle] metadata works. > > > > > > > > The interesting piece of this is that we can use the Flex > > resource > > > bundles > > > > as is. They don't need to be re-compiled by Royale from > > .properties > > > files. > > > > > > > > The question for us is about how to deal with > downloading these > > > bundles. > > > > Right now, I've commented out [ResourceBundle] metadata > and the > > > > -library-path options that point to the Flex bundles > until we > > figure > > > out > > > > where to put them and how. > > > > > > > > I think for Ant, it is as simple as downloading a Flex > SDK and > > > grabbing > > > > the bundles. The Royale build already grabs > PixelBender. The > > Flex > > > SDK > > > > download is big, so it will slow up builds from scratch. > > > > > > > > For Maven, it is trickier. I don't think there are Maven > > artifacts > > > for > > > > Flex resource SWCs. Does anybody know for sure, one way > or > > > another? If > > > > not, we might manually publish the SWCs as artifacts. > > > > > > > > I'm not in favor of copying the Flex properties files > into the > > > Royale repo > > > > and putting together Ant and Maven builds for them, but > if some > > > volunteer > > > > wants to do it, I won't object, I just don't want to > spend my > > time > > > doing > > > > it, since these files should effectively be immutable. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd5adcf9035e54f7b222c08d63385e822%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636753047558562672&sdata=pQa3dQZUdmrjlniEKltUz7%2F39fPu5UFEgHXJMeI70OE%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd5adcf9035e54f7b222c08d63385e822%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636753047558562672&sdata=pQa3dQZUdmrjlniEKltUz7%2F39fPu5UFEgHXJMeI70OE%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd5adcf9035e54f7b222c08d63385e822%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636753047558562672&sdata=pQa3dQZUdmrjlniEKltUz7%2F39fPu5UFEgHXJMeI70OE%3D&reserved=0 > > > -- Carlos Rovira https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd5adcf9035e54f7b222c08d63385e822%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636753047558562672&sdata=pQa3dQZUdmrjlniEKltUz7%2F39fPu5UFEgHXJMeI70OE%3D&reserved=0
