Hi Alex, Mx:ModuleLoader is compiled successfully now I can see mx:Module on output screen. Now I will work on remote object.
-Thanks, Alina Kazi -----Original Message----- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2018 10:38 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run Hi Alina, I cannot work with .RAR files. Plus dropbox won't display MXML files. Examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules is using mx:ModuleLoader. It is better to compare what it is doing instead of what Basic UIModuleLoader is doing. Thanks, -Alex On 11/5/18, 4:16 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: Hi Alex, You have created an Example in royale/ModuleExample Contains two files in different projects : MainApp.mxml and Module.mxml MainApp uses UIModuleLoader and it loads the modules with moduleName & modulePath properties. UIModuleLoader extends UIBase In MXRoyale, ModuleLoader extends VBox extends Box extends Container extends UIComponent extends UIBase UIModule extends Group extends GroupBase extends UIBase In MXRoyale, Module extends Container extends UIComponent extends UIBase We have compare all files , functionality is copied from Basic -> MXRoyale , default.css is also copied. We have checked default.css for Basic's Group, GroupBase We have checked default.css for MXRoyale's Container Still my Example do not compile for MX Module before and after changes. https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dropbox.com%2Fs%2Ftxbccb5ofblmnr9%2FModuleExampleMX.rar%3Fdl%3D0&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999270941&sdata=FwC038v2mIDz2Uvj0yWGzNejIuDOSiNH9sHyyY6AVxg%3D&reserved=0 We are using url = "modules/Module.swf" instead of modulePath = "modules" and moduleName = "Module" We have seen functionality again and again after comparison we have copied missing src from Basic -> MXRoyale Please compile this example with output for us or Guide us. Thanks in Advance, Alina Kazi -----Original Message----- From: Alina Kazi [mailto:alina.k...@d-bz.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018 10:07 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run Hi Alex, When I tried after mapping BorderContainer to MX Container with the lookupOnly="true" in the spark-royale-manifest.xml, It worked for me. Thanks, Alina -----Original Message----- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 9:48 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run I think you can ignore that error unless you see other errors in the browser console related to it. Did you check the browser console for errors when it came up blank? Or step into the code to see whether the new code is being called? And compare to how MX Container works? These are strategies and skills that will be helpful as a developer. If your code doesn't require that BorderContainer is a SkinnableContainer, you could try mapping BorderContainer to MX Container with the lookup-"true" in the spark-royale-manifest.xml -Alex On 10/30/18, 4:52 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: Hi Alex, 1. You may have to copy other CSS from MX Container's or Spark Group's base classes and put all of it in the BorderContainer selector. MX Container extends UIComponent , So I copied only MX Container's CSS in BorderContainer selector. 2. It would have been more helpful to see what you had put in the defaults.css file, and also, since the compile was successful What I have copied in default.css: BorderContainer { IBeadView: ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.ContainerView"); IBeadLayout: ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.layouts.BasicLayout"); IViewport: ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.ScrollingViewport"); IViewportModel: ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.models.ViewportModel"); } In @media -royale-swf BorderContainer { IBackgroundBead: ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.SolidBackgroundBead"); IBorderBead: ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.SingleLineBorderBead"); IContentView: ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.ContainerContentArea"); } 3. I think you will need to copy code from MX Container into SkinnableContainer, especially the MXMLDataInterpreter code. Now, I have copy code from MX Container into SkinnableContainer, MXMLDataInterpreter code and copied other code step by step that was related to Bead. Output is blank as before, following are the links shared earlier : While compiling the ControlsExample https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FppOz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999270941&sdata=PbPkfCOdDZm1T1YkablUxjceytSXd0n0g3ax7kDyDXQ%3D&reserved=0 Output has 1 Error & 1 warning and Build Successfully, console is : https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F5YMM&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999270941&sdata=EFIN%2FaCR6cJB8o%2FrGOgv6%2FX5XG4nKEv5P%2BOT1B53S9s%3D&reserved=0 Thanks in Advance, Alina Kazi -----Original Message----- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 1:54 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run Hi Alina, You may have to copy other CSS from MX Container's or Spark Group's base classes and put all of it in the BorderContainer selector. If all rules are royale-specific, like IBeadModel, then they won't be listed in the output css but should be in the main .JS file. It would have been more helpful to see what you had put in the defaults.css file, and also, since the compile was successful, whether there were any errors at run time. I looked briefly at BorderContainer and SkinnableContainer. I think you will need to copy code from MX Container into SkinnableContainer, especially the MXMLDataInterpreter code I have to stop working for tonight. HTH, -Alex On 10/30/18, 12:54 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: Hi Alex, 1. I would think that BorderContainer could use the same beads as MX Container, or even Spark Group. I have tried both MX Container / Spark Group Beads Case(A) I have copied MX Container from file (defaults.css in MXRoyale/src/main/resource) to (defaults.css in SparkRoyale/src/main/resource) renamed Container to BorderContainer in (defaults.css in SparkRoyale/src/main/resource). Case(B) I have copied Spark GroupBase from file (defaults.css in SparkRoyale /src/main/resource) to (defaults.css in SparkRoyale/src/main/resource) renamed copied word GroupBase to BorderContainer in (defaults.css in SparkRoyale/src/main/resource). 2. Not having BorderContainer in the output CSS is unexpected if you are using it in the MXML In Both Cases A and B the output default.css file for ControlsExample contains .BorderContainer { } In Both Cases A and B output default.css file for SparkRoyale.swc contains Whatever I copied to (defaults.css in SparkRoyale/src/main/resource) for BorderContainer. 3. that you are using the same namespace prefix as other components that are working Yes I am using same namespace prefix as other components that are working [1] ControlsExample File : https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FppOz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=zVrzXVGnd1%2FyHTRYibeByWChrlgO2CEpzPeSOy8RSlo%3D&reserved=0 [2] SparkRoyale.swc console output : https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FrsqI&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=GiUGZ%2BtQQWMrevZkc0EVmhU6mUkCO%2FvVrG7IwOsyGDc%3D&reserved=0 ( Case B :When GroupBase default.css is copied for BorderContainer) [3] ControlsExample console output : https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FXY7o&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=dmilOA%2BmDYtKbh9wYu3jYiwK9HqEY8l2XboYLktj8sQ%3D&reserved=0 ( Case B :When GroupBase default.css is copied for BorderContainer) [4] SparkRoyale.swc console output : https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fsm8M&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=Q7%2Bd39c9fC0l79lORzaeKVGDbJLCmvK7hs2KjCQ%2Fjrw%3D&reserved=0 ( Case A :When Container default.css is copied for BorderContainer) [5] ControlsExample console output : https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F5YMM&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=h24BzzkAeswpbl6er%2FYavvOvtPzANrCSrAvVkULlmYo%3D&reserved=0 ( Case A :When Container default.css is copied for BorderContainer) Yes the output from compiling the SparkRoyale SWC does not contain any warnings about BorderContainer, and the SWC builds successfully and is being copied into the right places I have checked by unzipping the SWC and checked the defaults.css and JS files Thanks, Alina Kazi -----Original Message----- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 9:14 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run Hi Alina, Again, it is important to be efficient in communication. Just telling me the ModuleLoader does not load a module does not let me help you. You should try to remember past emails we had and report on what you tried from those past emails. For example, do you get any warnings or errors in the console? Did you verify that the files are where they should be? Did you step through how TourDeFlexModules loads a module and compare to your application? For BorderContainer, and really, any UI widget in the Royale emulation components, an important thing to understand is that they are, so far, all based on UIBase, since UIComponent extends UIBase and all UI widgets extend UIComponent. That means that the CSS must load model and view beads and often controller and/or layout and other beads. So first thing is to understand by examining source and output whether there are such beads for BorderContainer. I would think that BorderContainer could use the same beads as MX Container, or even Spark Group. I don't think we've implemented spark skins in SparkRoyale yet, so any skinClass is going to get ignored right now. Not having BorderContainer in the output CSS is unexpected if you are using it in the MXML. So I would double check that you have added BorderContainer to the correct CSS file (defaults.css in SparkRoyale/src/main/resource) and that you are using the same namespace prefix as other components that are working, and that the output from compiling the SparkRoyale SWC does not contain any warnings about BorderContainer, and the SWC builds successfully and is being copied into the right places. SWC files are really ZIP files so you can always unzip the SWC and examine the defaults.css and JS files. HTH, -Alex On 10/29/18, 4:11 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: Hi Alex, Please answer for the following issues : 1. Issue (MX ModuleLoader) : We need similar working as in TourdeFlexModules Example : D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\mxroyale\tourdeflexmodules\src\spark\components\VideoPlayerModuleLoader.mxml ModuleLoader url property does not load Module. 2. Issue (Spark BorderContainer) : If we use s:BorderContainer all controls inside Spark BorderContainer are not shown in output. How it will be shown in output. Do I need to add something in default.css for BorderContainer We have added BorderContainer { backgroundColor: #FFFFFF; borderStyle : "solid"; cornerRadius: 0; skinClass: ClassReference("spark.skins.spark.BorderContainerSkin"); } in SparkRoyale default.css but still output is empty. All other files applications.mxml and shmApplication.as are same as before [1] AppView_ERP.mxml https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FY2ne&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=OHdSxXNmmbSoXpUlHI0USOIaVbWtyVHHUihHOTgybJw%3D&reserved=0 Thanks, Alina Kazi -----Original Message----- From: Alina Kazi [mailto:alina.k...@d-bz.com] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 12:03 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run Thanks a lot Alex. It works. -Alina -----Original Message----- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 12:03 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run Hi Alina, Add the following metadata to your shmApplication.as It should go before the "public class". Check mx.core.Application to see how it is placed in that file. [Frame(factoryClass="mx.managers.SystemManager")] This should result in an applications_mx_managers_SystemManager.js file in the bin/js-debug folder, and the index.html should try to instantiate that file which should then launch everything else. HTH, -Alex On 10/28/18, 11:54 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: Hi Alex, Files in the bin/js-debug folder Files : AppView_ERP.js applications.css applications.js index.html Namespace.js QName.js shmApplication.js XML.js XMLList.js Folders : library mx org Thanks, Alina Kazi -----Original Message----- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 11:48 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run Hi Alina, When you use shmApplication, what files end up in the bin/js-debug folder (the subfolders don't matter right now). Thanks, -Alex On 10/28/18, 11:40 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: Hi Alex, Yes, I am running the js-debug version. If I do similar working in mx:Application tag it works but when I do it with custom shmApplication control that extends mx.core.Application it does not show anything in output. My file applications.mxml starts with tag <cc:shmApplication> And shmApplication.as extends mx.core.Application. I am adding namespace xmlns:cc="*" [1] applications.mxml https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOpDT&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=eQtufZ0nzd2iepnZ09p8WItiZI0dcSZIWpyrM1f%2F76M%3D&reserved=0 [2] shmApplication.as https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FPz6p&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=or99%2F%2F9TME5LbjJ7n0uWQUF22ksVWpuBSFFCMrUkG9U%3D&reserved=0 [3] AppView_ERP.mxml https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FRLcA&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=71g3utug8iFq40xa4%2BXJuOoCD0gC%2BDxbXkFQBsizB28%3D&reserved=0 All files are placed on same path. When I replace applications.mxml opening and closing tag <cc:shmApplication> tag to <mx:Application> It shows both Button and Label in output. But I need to use shmApplication. Again these are not my actual source files . It's just a scenario we need . So, I create a separate example for that. Thanks, Alina Kazi -----Original Message----- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 11:02 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run Hi Alina, Are you running the version in js-debug? It should show something in the console. Also look at the DOM tree and see what HTML elements have been created, if any. -Alex On 10/28/18, 10:28 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: Hi Piotr, Application is compiled Successfully but nothing shows in output in the Web Browser Console when running my application. Thanks, Alina -----Original Message----- From: Piotr Zarzycki [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 7:09 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run Hi Alina, Just to help a bit with all of that. Do you see any output in the Web Browser Console when you running your application ? If yes provide it here. Thanks, Piotr pt., 26 paź 2018 o 14:42 Alina Kazi <alina.k...@d-bz.com> napisał(a): > Hi Alex, > We have 3 files in our Project > Files Path is : > [1]Project -> applications.mxml (main file) > [2]Project ->shmApplication.as extends mx.core.Application > [3]Project-> AppView_ERP.mxml > > As MX ViewStack , Canvas are working controls. > > AppView_ERP.mxml has initial tag mx:Canvas > > applications.mxml has initial tag cc:shmApplication and > We have method in applications.mxml > private function fn_roBasicConfRH(e:ResultEvent):void > { > var appViewStack:ViewStack = new > ViewStack(); > > appViewStack.percentWidth = 100; > appViewStack.percentHeight = 100; > this.addElement(appViewStack); > > var compERPView:Canvas = new AppView_ERP() > as Canvas; > > compERPView.id = "appView_ERP"; > appView = compERPView; > appViewStack.addElement(compERPView); > > mx.external.ExternalInterface.call("function > setWinStatus(){window.status='" + iniFileParams.CompanyName + "';}"); > > } > Application is compiled Successfully but nothing shows in output. > If you need more details. I can create an example Project. > > Thanks in Advance, > Alina Kazi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alina Kazi [mailto:alina.k...@d-bz.com] > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 3:35 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > Hi Alex, > > We have replaced import spark.components.Application with import > mx.core.Application in our whole Application. After this change we are > still able to compile our Application successfully. > Are you using SWFLoader to load other applications? Again, your API > Report did not mention this. > We are not using SWFLoader anywhere in our Application. We are using > ModuleLoader only. > What do you mean by needing Spark Application many times? > Sorry, import spark.components.Application is written multiple times in > src code but used once. > > That means now we don't need Spark Application. > Thanks for Helping us. > > -Alina Kazi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 12:45 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > Hi Alina, > > Where did you use mx:Application in your application? Somehow it got into > the report. > > What do you mean by needing Spark Application many times? Are you using > SWFLoader to load other applications? Again, your API Report did not > mention this. > > Getting Application to work can be significant amount of work as it has a > lot of things to do. One approach you could take is to step through your > example with mx:Application and compare it to the Spark Application and > make changes to the Spark Application until it works, but I'm concerned > that you can't always copy code from mx:Application. > > If you want to take on a big challenge like getting Appilcation to work > that is fine, but I guess I can delay my work on Charts and get Spark > Application to work. Let me know what you decide. But I am very concerned > about the accuracy of the data you have provided. I'm wondering what else > you are using that we don't know about. > > I'm done for today. I will see what you decide in my morning. > > -Alex > > On 10/26/18, 12:22 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: > > Hi Alex , > I am using skinClass 2 times overall in my Application. I can skip > that if it takes a lot of time. > I don't know How API report skip some API's. > We need SparkApplication at many places in our Application. > If you can explain more in [1] , we want to also participate in > getting emulation component to run. > > Like Spark TextInput is now working as MX TextInput, We have copied > some source from MX TextInput to Spark TextInput after reading [1] and it > worked. > > [1] > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FEmulation-Components%23getting-an-emulation-component-to-run&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999280946&sdata=8kcPT8ZhnvwGC9dnJjipCpC8rYthLbBV1Un93kD5XzY%3D&reserved=0 > > Thanks in Advance, > Alina Kazi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 11:50 AM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > Hi Alina, > > In your API report, only mx.core.Application was referenced. I don't > understand why Spark Application was not referenced, yet you are using it > now. We have not spent any time getting Spark Application to run. If > that's really what you need, I would start copying code from > mx.core.Application. if you don't have custom skins for Application, you > can probably skip the skinning-related code. > > Good luck, > -Alex > > On 10/25/18, 11:10 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: > > Hi , > > We are able to compile our Application and Library Projects > successfully. Application Launch file uses a file that extends Spark > Application.as file. This Spark Application.as file is present in Apache > Royale SDK repo and has been emulated. But when we run the application, No > visual output is shown in index.html (i.e output file) > > Spark Application extends SkinnableContainer in Flex SDK > default.css for SkinnableContainer is: > SkinnableContainer > { > skinClass: > ClassReference("spark.skins.spark.SkinnableContainerSkin"); > } > > > In Flex mx:Application extends LayoutContainer extends Container > in Flex SDK default.css for Container is > > Container > { > borderSkin: > ClassReference("mx.skins.spark.ContainerBorderSkin"); > borderStyle: "none"; > cornerRadius: 0; > } > > You have added in MXRoyale default.css > > Container > { > IBeadView: > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.ContainerView"); > IBeadLayout: > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.layouts.BasicLayout"); > IViewport: > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.ScrollingViewport"); > IViewportModel: > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.models.ViewportModel"); > } > > And mx:Application shows output. > > For Example : > > [1] Nothing in Output > <s:Application xmlns:fx=" > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=MKP51sGDrTIYFArUTYRgH6FuIdCRoOCIPjpVR64XJDc%3D&reserved=0"; > > > xmlns:s="library://ns.apache.org/royale/spark" > > xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx" height = "100%" width = > "100%" > > > <s:Button x="30" y="30" > id="searchBtn" label="Search"/> > > </s:Application> > > [2] It shows Button in output file > <mx:Application xmlns:fx=" > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=MKP51sGDrTIYFArUTYRgH6FuIdCRoOCIPjpVR64XJDc%3D&reserved=0"; > > > xmlns:s="library://ns.apache.org/royale/spark" > > xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx" height = "100%" width = > "100%" > > > <s:Button x="30" y="30" > id="searchBtn" label="Search"/> > > </mx:Application> > > How can I get Spark Application working as MX Application ? > > Thanks, > Alina > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 10:04 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > Hi Alina, > > Again, I cannot help you as efficiently if you do not provide > important details. > > You are showing some part of the console for building the > application. But did the compiler hang, or did it think it finished? What > does your build.xml look like? What was the full console output? I would > want to see what command you typed and all output up to and including the > command prompt after it finished. As I mentioned in prior emails, use > paste.apache.org if necessary for large quantities of console output. > > From the one line you pasted below, it implied the build did not > finish, yet you are saying that you tried to run it and nothing showed up. > Why would you try to run it if the build did not finish? If the build did > finish, did you get the expected output files? If the build did not > finish, try stripping down what is in the Module until it works, or compare > the build.xml settings against examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules. > > There are so many ways things can go wrong, especially when > developing new code. You must learn how to work efficiently in these > conditions. > > Another technique is to compare working against non-working. > Examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules is able to compile and load modules. > You can set breakpoints in the tourdeflexmodules code and follow how it > works and set breakpoints in similar places in your code and follow how it > works and compares. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 10/22/18, 1:12 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > This time I told you about folders hierarchy its same as > examples/royale/ModuleExample. > js:UIModuleLoader is replaced with mx:ModuleLoader url > property is added in ModuleLoader and extra properties are removed, > js:UIModule is replaced with mx:Module > js:Application is replaced with mx:Application > namespace is replaced with mx namespace > > Console output stopped at : > [mxmlc] 109142 bytes written to > D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\royale\ModuleExample\Module\bin-debug\Module.swf > in 3.220 seconds > > How else I can explain it in a better way. > Simply I just want same working like > examples/royale/ModuleExample with Mx Controls. > I am not using TitleWindow in my current example. > > > Thanks, > Alina Kazi > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 12:40 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > Hi Alina, > > Again, half a world away, I cannot know what your folder > structure and build files look like, or what you tried or didn't try. And > now, I have to stop working and we missed an opportunity to help you > because the important information was not provided in your earlier email. > I wrote some techniques in this email: > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread.html%2Fe6f3aa4010dca8c9bdbe2828a89295039d05d23806a5fe03ae18dbe4%40%253Cdev.royale.apache.org%253E&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=2i2XAQViO%2BSHv15rhcuZKTTvjK6kwNjC40%2FhwCLh%2FSk%3D&reserved=0 > > In your next email, I expect you see evidence that you have > understood and tried the techniques in the email I linked. You will be > expected to provide console output or information about the tree of > elements. And this might be a good opportunity for you to try the debugger > and set breakpoints in various places. Even if you don't actually solve > the problem you are facing, you are going to have to become an expert in > debugging JavaScript output from the Royale Compiler. > > Please reserve the time to write a really good email with the > important information and questions. It will save all of us time. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 10/21/18, 11:39 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > Hi Alina, > > The key piece for modules is getting the output in the > right place. Flex/Flash has some interesting rules around how URLs got > loaded. I haven't found a practical way to replicate that in the Browser, > so for now, it is up to you to put the output where you are telling > ModuleLoader to load it. > > If you look at the Ant build.xml for royale/ModuleExample, > the Module/build.xml assumes the MainApp has been built first and copies > its output files into the MainApp's output folders. > > If you look at the build.xml for > mxroyale/touredeflexexamples, it uses the -module-output compiler option to > redirect the output. > > If you look in the Browser console, I expect you will see > errors that it couldn’t find a particular JS file for the module. Pay > attention to the folders and adjust your build script to place the output > in the right place (or adjust where you tell ModuleLoader to find the > module. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 10/21/18, 11:22 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> > wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > Created an example contains two files : > 1. Module.mxml > <mx:Module xmlns:fx=" > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=MKP51sGDrTIYFArUTYRgH6FuIdCRoOCIPjpVR64XJDc%3D&reserved=0 > " > xmlns:mx="library:// > ns.apache.org/royale/mx"> > > <mx:Label text="This Label is in the module" /> > <mx:TextInput id="ti" text="This TextInput is also > in the module" /> > </mx:Module> > > 2. MainApp.mxml > <mx:Application xmlns:fx=" > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=MKP51sGDrTIYFArUTYRgH6FuIdCRoOCIPjpVR64XJDc%3D&reserved=0 > " > xmlns:mx="library:// > ns.apache.org/royale/mx" > > > <mx:Button label="Btn in Application" /> > > <mx:ModuleLoader id = "ml1" x="30" y="30" url = > "Module.swf" /> > > </mx:Application> > > No visual output shown . I want it to work like > examples\royale\ModuleExample > > > Thanks in Advance , > Alina Kazi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 9:33 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > Hi Alina, > > I think there is a misunderstanding somewhere. > > How has your company built the Flex app over the past > years? Is it all from an IDE or do you have some sort of script or build > tool? > > Whatever you are using to build the Flex app should be > translated to the Ant script. What is currently in the Ant script you > copied from tourdeflexmodules is custom designed for tourdeflexmodules. It > presumes lots of little applications that don't use custom libraries. > > The mxmlc task in Ant is just like running mxml from > the command line or having an Application project in an IDE. > The compc task in Ant is just like running compc from > the command line or having a Library project in an IDE. > > You can see from the build.xml files in the > royale-asjs repo that we build SWCs by having a build.xml in each library > folder and calling them from a build.xml in a parent folder. You might > find that pattern useful. > > You will need to understand the -source-path and > -library-path and -external-library-path and other compiler options that > were used to build the Flex app and copy probably all of those options into > the right place in the Ant scripts. > > It would be uncommon to compile a file called shmUtil > with mxmlc. shmUtil sounds like a file in a library, not a standalone > application. I'll bet it comes from a library that should be compiled with > compc along with a lot of other files. > > > If you are having trouble with Ant, also try the > command-line, then others may be able to help you see the differences > between your Ant script and what worked on the command-line. If you use an > IDE to build the Flex app, you will need to find out all of the compiler > options the IDE sets up for you. I think others can help you with that as > well. > > -Alex > > On 10/16/18, 2:17 AM, "Alina Kazi" < > alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > Created a mxmlc task directly in build.xml still > an error is occured : > Added to Build.xml : > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FwBDm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=ZuiXnvzQxolOK7rsx8%2F8JCmAG8daVfC2T1qG7cuh4cE%3D&reserved=0 > Error : > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOXFT&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=tBRJXpe4JHzu9HndjsTs9iQwHqDqXq%2FQhZrD%2FpuWtLI%3D&reserved=0 > > Thanks, > Alina Kazi > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:46 AM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > Hi Alina, > > The example in > examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest is working and accesses the server > that is in examples/amf/ SampleAmfWebApp. Theoretically, your old > mx:RemoteObject code should work untouched. Try it without touching it and > tell us what kinds of errors you are getting. If you are getting runtime > errors, see how the RemoteObjectAMFTest uses "casting" to be explicit about > the types of the RemoteObject expressions. You'll see "as Operation" to > indicate that an mx:method in an mx:RemoteObject is an Operation. > > The compile-mxml macro is in the build.xml file. > It has certain expectations of the structure of the source files. Your > source files are likely have a different folder structure. You will need > to add source-paths and other compiler options to the macro, or stop using > the macro and call the mxmlc ant task directly. That is up to you. This > is a good opportunity to get to know Ant and the compiler better. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 10/15/18, 11:07 PM, "Alina Kazi" < > alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: > > Hi Alex & Carlos, > I haven't tested my ported Application with > server side functionality yet. > Can you please share an Example that I can > follow to get my mx:RemoteObject working as FLEX. > > I have another question > > I am working on my Application and it has two > different directories like com->shm->modules->AP and > com->shm->modules->components and I want to compile a file inside > com->shm->modules->AP->abc.mxml and it uses a file inside > com->shm->modules->components->xyz.mxml. > I have added <compile-mxml > folder="/com/shm/modules/AP/" example=" abc"/> to build.xml. > unable to access xyz inside abc. > > Like > D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\mxroyale\tourdeflexmodules\src\spark\components\ > VideoPlayerExample.mxml is using VideoPlayer.mxml in my case > VideoPlayer.mxml is not is the same directory. > > Thanks, > Alina Kazi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Carlos Rovira [mailto: > carlosrov...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 12:26 AM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To > Run > > Hi Alex, > > yes, I added those classes when worked trying > to make it work in net RO, but I found a wall at that time. I think DSK > objects had a different code when deserialized, and our AMF implementation > was not able to handle that. > I was not able to know how to deal with that > so I had to abandon. At least I could pass that disabling small messages on > BlazeDS. > > I don't think Small Messages are very > important, don't know how "small" > will be, so I think we can go to other things > more important. If I found some problem as I start to grow my application > that could be related to small messages I'll report. Hope not find any issue > > The only drawback could be people coming that > must know they need to disable small messages on their BlazeDS. > > I think it will be more important later since > IExternalizable in itself seems an important addition. > > Thanks > > Carlos > > > > El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 20:21, Alex Harui > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>) > escribió: > > > The classes that represent DSK, DSA and DSC > are in the MXRoyale and > > Network projects, but it looks like they > implement IExternalizable. I > > don't see any evidence that the JS AMF > support currently handles > > IExternalizable. > > > > I'm not clear on how important SmallMessages > and IExternalizable are. > > If it isn't that important, there are plenty > of other things to work > > on. If it is important, do we have a test > case that uses IExternalizable? > > > > -Alex > > > > On 10/15/18, 10:55 AM, "Carlos Rovira" < > carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Yes, > > > > I tried today (with code > pre-callProperty, that I think does not make > > difference for this). > > There's small message support in RPC > classes, but when I looked at that > > code when I investigate it, I think must > be accompanied from some AMF > > serialization/deserialization support. I > couldn't find any resources on > > this in the internet about how to handle > DSK, DSA or DSC. Maybe > > you can ask > > internally in Adobe how to deal with > that. My guess is that this > > was added > > to Flash plugin AMF serialization > capabilities. > > > > > > > > > > El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 19:03, Alex > Harui > > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>) > > escribió: > > > > > Carlos, > > > > > > Have you verified that small messages > do not work with the MX > > > RemoteObject? I thought I saw Small > Message support when I was > > migrating > > > the code. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 10/15/18, 10:01 AM, "Carlos Rovira" > <carlosrov...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > just for if you don't know. If you > use BlazeDS Java server, > > remember > > > to set > > > up small messages to false, or you > RemoteObjects will not work. > > To get > > > small messages we'll need to > upgrade AMF > > serialization-deserialization > > > to > > > know how to handle DSK, DSA, and > DSC RemoteClass aliases. > > > > > > Best > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 18:39, > Alex Harui > > > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>) > > > escribió: > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > Good to know. You (and anybody > working with the emulation > > > components) are > > > > expected to keep track of the > commits to the royale-compiler > > as well > > > as the > > > > royale-asjs repos and stay > updated. We are still finding bugs > > in the > > > > transpiling that may affect you. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/15/18, 2:17 AM, "Alina > Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot it worked for > me. > > > > > > > > -Alina kazi > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > > > > Sent: Monday, October 15, > 2018 2:07 PM > > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Getting An > Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > Are you sure you are using > the latest compiler? Try > > compiling > > > > > examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest. It compiles without > > errors > > > for me. > > > > > > > > I have to stop for tonight. > Hopefully others will help > > you. > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/15/18, 1:37 AM, "Alina > Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > We are using MX Remote > Object in almost our every > > Class like > > > this: > > > > <mx:RemoteObject > > > > channelSet="{parentApplication.amfChannelSet}" > > > > id="DataProviderService" > showBusyCursor="true" > > > > > > > > destination="shmBasic" > fault="handleFault(event);" > > > > > > > > result="handleResult(event);" /> > > > > We get error ASBlocker > subsystem. > > > > When we comment > RemoteObject we need to comment methods > > > those are > > > > using it. > > > > > > > > I agree with that if I > will delete some code for > > compilation > > > I > > > > will face other issues at later > stage. > > > > > > > > Can I replace > mx:remoteObject with : > > > > <s:RemoteObject id="ro" > endpoint=" > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jamesward.com%2Fcensus2-tests%2Fmessagebroker%2Famf&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=4sIL88V%2Bit8tvbuKSVwm9XeWmdDkO0yxSd4%2B5o5nth4%3D&reserved=0 > > > " > > > > destination="census"/> > > > > > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > -----Original > Message----- > > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > > > > Sent: Monday, October > 15, 2018 1:16 PM > > > > To: > dev@royale.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Getting An > Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > I recommend just running > the compiled application and > > fixing > > > > problems as you run into them. > > > > > > > > If you start copying > code and deleting other code, you > > cannot > > > > guarantee that the results will > run. I'm not even sure > > TitleWindow > > > is a > > > > valid child control of an > Application. Usually it is a popup > > dialog. > > > > > > > > When you run the > application, you will probably find > > > exceptions in > > > > the console. Set a breakpoint, > see if you can figure out why > > it is > > > > generating an exception. Change > the code as needed. > > > > > > > > If you aren’t getting > exceptions, then look at the > > element > > > tree. > > > > Either all of the expected > elements have been created or not. > > If > > > not, then > > > > look at the innermost element to > see what it is. In the > > properties > > > for the > > > > element is a royale_wrapper > property that points to the > > transpiled > > > AS3 > > > > class. That can help you know > what class didn't create its > > children. > > > > Check the _beads array of that > class to see if it created its > > beads > > > or > > > > not. If not, check the CSS for > that element, or debug into > > its code. > > > > Usually, addedToParent is where > the view bead is added. > > > > > > > > If the elements have > been created, check the sizes. > > Often > > > some of > > > > them will have width or height = > 0. Try to figure why it is > > getting > > > a bad > > > > size. > > > > > > > > If you take this > approach, then if you get stuck you > > can ask > > > a > > > > much more specific question and > we can give you more specific > > > answers. > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, our days > only overlap by a few hours, > > but I > > > hope > > > > other committers can help as > well. It is in their best > > interest to > > > improve > > > > their help and debugging skills. > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/15/18, 12:59 AM, > "Alina Kazi" < > > alina.k...@d-bz.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > As our whole > application is compiled successfully > > without > > > > error as a part of SparkRoyale > Library. > > > > > > > > Now, We have created > a project like > > tourdeflexmodules to > > > > compile and visually see the > application output. > > > > Initially started > with the basic(small) file of our > > > > application that is used by most > of the files of our > > Application. > > > > > > > > We have a file in > our application "Picklist.mxml" > > > > It was actually like > : > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FRVtj&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=%2BVxE%2Btgxg37E%2FWFBkj6Bs%2BFTKm3o1RbzwORC1ZnFT2M%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > we want to see it > visually as all our mx and spark > > > controls > > > > are already added in Apache > Royale. > > > > Deleted whole code > accept visual controls from src > > file : > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FH4Sm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999290960&sdata=yhFRufdC9vB%2BmaKuo3rPCdG2DsfHq0%2BiSZ8mAWdwAU4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > Nothing shows inside > spark BorderContainer & > > TitleWindow. > > > > [3] > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FEpS8&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999300964&sdata=XEZqR0WI7%2FzzBIx4d6hQti9ezzLLRpMCzOcVa5OCZTI%3D&reserved=0 > > > > How can we see all > visual controls as they were in > > Flex > > > of > > > > this particular file. > > > > Even spark > BorderContainer default.css is copied > > from > > > Flex > > > > ->Royale. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > -----Original > Message----- > > > > From: Alex Harui > [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > > > > Sent: Monday, > October 15, 2018 11:15 AM > > > > To: > dev@royale.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Getting > An Emulation Component To Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > Different APIs will > have different solutions. > > Pick an > > > API you > > > > want to have work and let's > discuss how to make it work. > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/14/18, 10:48 > PM, "Alina Kazi" < > > alina.k...@d-bz.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > All mx and spark > class methods those were left > > empty > > > for > > > > the compilation of Application. > > > > Also Module does > not show anything on screen. > > > > > > > > Thanks in > Advance, > > > > Alina > > > > > > > > -----Original > Message----- > > > > From: Alex Harui > [mailto: > > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > > > > Sent: Thursday, > October 11, 2018 12:32 PM > > > > To: > dev@royale.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: > Getting An Emulation Component To > > Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > Which components > or properties are you trying > > to get > > > to > > > > run? > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/10/18, > 10:40 PM, "Alina Kazi" < > > > alina.k...@d-bz.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What if CSS > for a component is not written > > in > > > Basic / > > > > Express defaults.css? > > > > > > > > And We need > it in MXRoyale / SparkRoyale > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Alex > Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] > > > > Sent: > Monday, October 08, 2018 8:40 PM > > > > To: Alina > Kazi > > > > Subject: Re: > Getting An Emulation > > Component To > > > Run > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please ask > these questions on dev@ as > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CSS with > ClassReference is a way to use > > > Composition to > > > > customize components. Copying > code is usually a bad practice > > as it > > > > creates maintenance issues. So, > in general, the preference > > should > > > be to > > > > use CSS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTH, > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Alina > Kazi <alina.k...@d-bz.com> > > > > Date: > Monday, October 8, 2018 at 2:02 AM > > > > To: Alex > Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > > > > Subject: > Getting An Emulation Component To > > Run > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > We want to > know how can we identify which > > is the > > > right > > > > stub? > > > > > > > > For Example: > selected property written > > > differently in > > > > CheckBox, RadioButton and > > > > > > > > we want > selected property for Button. How > > can we > > > > identify and pick the right code > for Button? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. > copying the little bits of code > > from the > > > > Basic or Express version into > the right stub in the Emulation > > > Component > > > > > > > > 2. > copying the CSS from Basic or > > Express > > > > defaults.css into the MXRoyale > or SparkRoyale defaults.css > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in > Advance, > > > > > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999300964&sdata=H3oweoyqUtp%2BQ4z0SmjOxQhBLqasvSr04RQUwA4w76w%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout. > > me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui% > 40adobe.com%7C04eb29f37fce > > > 40d3df9908d632c77330%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6367 > > > 52229546474497&sdata=7S2M%2BRlyCsWd2pShdvTsjfyJp9xyZ5bdaAc3zZQrilU > > %3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999300964&sdata=H3oweoyqUtp%2BQ4z0SmjOxQhBLqasvSr04RQUwA4w76w%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999300964&sdata=0hoONGV3E7erIqjMul7811MvEP5fQl89KSYxnNkT67M%3D&reserved=0 <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce20c74a6038404874b008d6431888f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636770169999300964&sdata=0hoONGV3E7erIqjMul7811MvEP5fQl89KSYxnNkT67M%3D&reserved=0>*
