Josh has had trouble getting this to work.

Some details on related issues:

https://github.com/BowlerHatLLC/vscode-as3mxml/issues/155
https://github.com/BowlerHatLLC/vscode-as3mxml/issues/265

> On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:02 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> If VSCode and Moonshine cannot handle the way we build the projects right now 
> from the command-line, then they should probably make changes so it works.  I 
> would guess that they do but the project files are not set up correctly.  
> There are separate manifests for the SWF-only classes.  Any Royale user of 
> these IDEs should be allowed to do that and not have every file in the 
> source-path included in the compilation.  So, IMO, the COMPILE::SWF changes 
> should be reverted and the IDE projects fixed or the IDEs themselves should 
> be fixed.
> 
> Regarding making a bead for FocusEvent, I don't know how to predict what you 
> will need.  We already have application level beads like SimpleStatesImpl.as. 
>  Hopefully FocusEvents can be added in that way.  If the code in 
> HTMLElementWrapper needs refactoring to allow plugging in different handlers 
> that may be ok.  It occurred to me that maybe we shouldn't even bake in 
> MouseConverter.  I haven't looked at how Touch is handled on touch devices 
> and whether it is an either/or with Mouse or not.
> 
> HTH,
> -Alex
> 
> 
> On 11/12/18, 2:55 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>    Hi Alex,
> 
>    I put the COMPILE::SWF in the imports due to all the warnings in VS Code
>    (and suppose that will be the same in Moonlight since uses the same core
>    and other IDEs using the compiler model as the source for warnings and
>    errors)
> 
>    If this doesn't make a problem, I think we could have as is to avoid all
>    those warnings and keep the IDEs clean (at least from royale framework
>    code), if that causes another some side problem we can revert the commit. I
>    suppose for your message that is not a problem, and is just that I didn't
>    write to give the reason behind this, right?
> 
>    Regarding FocusEvent, ok I'll make it a bead, but I'd want to know more
>    about this. There's something more I should need to take into account apart
>    from the starting pieces a committed to the branch? something in the
>    compiler or in typedefs?. IOW, if you tell me there's no more pieces, I can
>    focus on make the converter a bead and look why my tries are not working
>    right now.
> 
>    @Harbs <[email protected]>  you +1 is to all the thread or only to make
>    focus a bead?
> 
>    thanks
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    El lun., 12 nov. 2018 a las 8:00, Harbs (<[email protected]>) escribió:
> 
>> +1
>> 
>>> On Nov 12, 2018, at 2:20 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I don't think FocusEventConverter should be baked into
>> HTMLElementWrapper.
>> 
>> 
> 
>    -- 
>    Carlos Rovira
>    
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C98e283d1afcb415645d108d6488d537a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776169156260064&amp;sdata=FhOQfnQqdDUW8yTagY4VHiFD8Ih5s76ZJ4ObZzk80Vo%3D&amp;reserved=0
>  
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C98e283d1afcb415645d108d6488d537a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776169156260064&amp;sdata=FhOQfnQqdDUW8yTagY4VHiFD8Ih5s76ZJ4ObZzk80Vo%3D&amp;reserved=0>

Reply via email to