Does configname make any difference in your IDE? Maybe the IDE doesn't support
it. The compiler output should switch to saying it is loading flex-config
instead of royale-config.
The change you made to royale-config-template re-introduces the problem I was
trying to fix. IMO, you should make a local change in a branch instead of
reverting my commits.
I recommend that you compare the set of manifests loaded by flex-config vs
royale-config. It looks like some are missing. And you are welcome to make
another config.xml for your combination. The problem with having "everything"
in a -config.xml is that it can add too many options to code-hinting.
HTH,
-Alex
On 11/24/18, 7:04 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
after doing full rebuild I'm finding a problem in IDE (not in build) with
the new change +configname=flex
- we are using Jewel and MXRoyale, just por MX RPC (and maybe some other
class in MX).
- we are using several libraries and one application
today I found that all MX code throws error in VS Code and is not
recognize. I see the change about configname. To adapt our config project
to this, I added to each asconfig file in all royale libs and app in our
project the line
"additionalOptions": "+configname=flex"
but this doesn't solves the problem
in fact I'm seeing more problems like
In initializer for 'j:icon', type org.apache.royale.icons.FontIcon is not
assignable to target type 'org.apache.royale.core.IIcon'.
Implicit coercion of a value with static type MouseEvent to a possibly
unrelated type MouseEvent.
In initializer for 'j:previousButton', type org.apache.royale.jewel.Group
is not assignable to target type 'org.apache.royale.core.UIBase'.
Ambiguous reference to MouseEvent
and many more
This makes hundreds of errors and makes the IDE unusable. I suppose that
this change not block people waning to use a mix of libraries, and is just
a matter to know how to update configuration, right? I mean if someone
wants to use in the same application three different buttons( jewel, basic,
and mx/spark), that should still be possible right?
What should I do in my project configuration to solve this problem?
thanks
--
Carlos Rovira
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5d438916f4464d7083ff08d6521e31f9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636786686970715715&sdata=PW5OQu%2FUTUsv9SCa31O5X4aSBq%2FS3K6fwg2XdkGKkjI%3D&reserved=0
