mmm... is hard to me think that someone is still using FB for Royale. It's
a pretty old software and with no support this days.
Maybe we should open a thread and ask who is using FB. I think the response
should be near 0 or equal to 0.

El mar., 25 dic. 2018 a las 10:10, Harbs (<[email protected]>) escribió:

> No. I’m saying a newer version should be fine.
>
> I was just suggesting that if someone is using an older version, they can
> probably get it to work.
>
> > On Dec 25, 2018, at 10:04 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Are you saying we should use something older?
> >
> > Currently, we say Helios is the version to use, primarily because that's
> what was used by the Adobe team at the time the code base was donated to
> Apache, and partially out of concern of being able to generate the Flash
> Builder plugin that required Java 6.  I could not find information
> indicating that Helios could be patched to support Java 8.
> >
> > If we pick an older version, at least one of us needs to use that oldest
> version.  So far, the latest Eclipse is working where Helios did not.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 12/24/18, 11:54 PM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >    I’m using 4.7.2 with no apparent problems.
> >
> >    I’m pretty sure that anything 4.4 or later should work. That’s 4.5
> years old. I can’t imagine why someone would want to stick with such an old
> version of Eclipse, but it looks like it’s possible to add support for Java
> 8 in even older versions.[1]
> >
> >    Harbs
> >
> >    [1]
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FEclipse_(software)%23Releases&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9b0ecabb23aa49e8fc6108d66a3e24d2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636813212469048607&amp;sdata=uIY%2FjY7d7mU%2Fi5ZdoYXPpzau4MYC78HQTy%2BFVuiQ8vY%3D&amp;reserved=0
> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FEclipse_(software)%23Releases&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9b0ecabb23aa49e8fc6108d66a3e24d2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636813212469048607&amp;sdata=uIY%2FjY7d7mU%2Fi5ZdoYXPpzau4MYC78HQTy%2BFVuiQ8vY%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> >
> >> On Dec 25, 2018, at 9:21 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Looks like requiring Java 8 might result in a requirement to upgrade
> Eclipse.  I'm going to try the latest Eclipse.  Speak up if you can think
> of a reason we should use an older one.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 12/24/18, 12:01 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>   I’m fine with it too. I’ve been using FB with 1.8 for a while.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>   In my opinion, we’re not in the business of forcing anyone to do
> anything. Options are a good thing.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>   ________________________________
> >>   From: Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>
> >>   Sent: Monday, December 24, 2018 9:20:58 AM
> >>   To: [email protected]
> >>   Subject: Re: Royale Java versions
> >>
> >>   +1. We have new IDE Moonshine and VSCode. Maybe it's force people who
> using
> >>   still FB to finally drop that IDE to some modern one.
> >>
> >>   Thanks, Piotr
> >>
> >>   On Mon, Dec 24, 2018, 8:15 AM Alex Harui <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Royale is currently using Google Closure Compiler from June 2017.
> There
> >>> is a bug in that version and even the latest Closure Compiler that is
> >>> blocking release-mode module loading.  Google appears to be willing to
> fix
> >>> the bug, so that got me started on upgrading the Closure Compiler we
> bundle
> >>> to the latest release so we can quickly test out any fix for the module
> >>> issue.  Historically, when we upgrade Closure Compiler, there are
> changes
> >>> we need to make in our code to get Royale to work again, and it is
> >>> definitely true this time.  However, it appears that Closure Compiler
> is
> >>> now dependent on a version of Guava that requires Java 8.  We currently
> >>> allow Java 7 for Royale.  Any objections to dropping Java 7?  There are
> >>> hacks to upgrade Flash Builder to run on Java 8, so that shouldn't be
> an
> >>> issue.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to