OK. I’ll look at that when I have time.
> On Jan 1, 2019, at 9:05 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I don't have time to dig through your config, but I'm pretty sure
> frameworks/js/projects/AceJS works just fine without PlayerGlobal and
> shouldn't need COMPILE::JS blocks.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 12/31/18, 2:29 PM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> My main reason for avoiding the SWF build was to simplify building for
> consumers. I’ve managed to get asconfigc to build the swcs without any
> environment variables. The only dependency that I couldn’t avoid was
> playerglobal, but I added that to an npm install, so that’s pretty painless
> as well.
>
> Here’s the results:
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Funhurdle%2Fspectrum-royale&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6724ec588e8e45e916d108d66f6f6df2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636818921735199944&sdata=EWKMyndh1HTFh8q10o3oD9YjuGMtrxTsij%2FUlVh0L9E%3D&reserved=0
>
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Funhurdle%2Fspectrum-royale&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6724ec588e8e45e916d108d66f6f6df2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636818921735199944&sdata=EWKMyndh1HTFh8q10o3oD9YjuGMtrxTsij%2FUlVh0L9E%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Basically, two commands will build the swc from a freshly downloaded repo
> (within the Spectrum folder):
>
> npm install
> asconfigc
>
> It might be nice as a long term goal to get js-only projects that can
> output to swc without needing the COMPILE::JS blocks, but I think the setup I
> ended up with is very manageable.
>
> Thanks,
> Harbs
>
>> On Dec 31, 2018, at 9:45 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> IMO, extermely difficult. It would be a major change to the compiler.
>>
>> The compiler only knows how to get definitions from a SWC by parsing the
>> library.swf in the SWC. It sounds like you are proposing that the compiler
>> get definitions by parsing the JS in a SWC? That would be significant work,
>> IMO.
>>
>> What really makes a SWC "js-only" is whether it is on the library-path when
>> compiling a JS-only app. That said, the SWC should have the correct JS API
>> surface in the library.swf. That is done, as I mentioned in my prior post,
>> by setting the COMPILE::SWF and external-library-path appropriately in the
>> SWF target. A SWF target does not have to use playerglobal/airglobal and
>> generate code that can run on Flash. All it needs is the right
>> prerequisite definitions in order to generate its own definitions in its
>> library.swf. Look at the build.xml files in frameworks/js/projects/XXXJS.
>> Do not start from the build.xml files in frameworks/projects. They are for
>> generating runnable SWF components.
>>
>> HTH,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 12/30/18, 11:36 PM, "Harbs" <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> How difficult would it be to output it for JS-only output? Where would I
>> look for that code?
>>
>>> On Dec 31, 2018, at 9:14 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> The catalog.xml is written out based on the SWF target. I think in the JS
>>> swcs, we set COMPILE::SWF and -external-library-path for SWF to the same
>>> settings as JSRoyale target.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 12/30/18, 8:00 AM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I more-or-less figured it out, but for some reason, I’m not getting
>>> components in my src. I’m only getting the classes.
>>>
>>> Here’s the project (I’m compiling using ant):
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Funhurdle%2Fspectrum-royale&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6724ec588e8e45e916d108d66f6f6df2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636818921735199944&sdata=EWKMyndh1HTFh8q10o3oD9YjuGMtrxTsij%2FUlVh0L9E%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Funhurdle%2Fspectrum-royale&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6724ec588e8e45e916d108d66f6f6df2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636818921735199944&sdata=EWKMyndh1HTFh8q10o3oD9YjuGMtrxTsij%2FUlVh0L9E%3D&reserved=0>
>>>
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Funhurdle%2Fspectrum-royale&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6724ec588e8e45e916d108d66f6f6df2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636818921735199944&sdata=EWKMyndh1HTFh8q10o3oD9YjuGMtrxTsij%2FUlVh0L9E%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Funhurdle%2Fspectrum-royale&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6724ec588e8e45e916d108d66f6f6df2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636818921735199944&sdata=EWKMyndh1HTFh8q10o3oD9YjuGMtrxTsij%2FUlVh0L9E%3D&reserved=0>>
>>>
>>> I’m getting the following catalog in my swc:
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FtFXj&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6724ec588e8e45e916d108d66f6f6df2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636818921735209949&sdata=LcPGtO6X4TTzBVOwqlEXXebp4LD5fcGlry%2Blk1YGplA%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FtFXj&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6724ec588e8e45e916d108d66f6f6df2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636818921735209949&sdata=LcPGtO6X4TTzBVOwqlEXXebp4LD5fcGlry%2Blk1YGplA%3D&reserved=0><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FtFXj&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6724ec588e8e45e916d108d66f6f6df2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636818921735209949&sdata=LcPGtO6X4TTzBVOwqlEXXebp4LD5fcGlry%2Blk1YGplA%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FtFXj&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6724ec588e8e45e916d108d66f6f6df2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636818921735209949&sdata=LcPGtO6X4TTzBVOwqlEXXebp4LD5fcGlry%2Blk1YGplA%3D&reserved=0>>
>>>
>>> The features section does not have <feature-components> and there’s no
>>> <components> section.
>>>
>>> Any clue why that is? I can’t find anything wrong with my manifest.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Harbs
>>>
>>>> On Dec 30, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Harbs <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I’m putting together a component set for a JS css component set and I’m
>>>> not going to bother with SWF compatibility. Is there any examples of
>>>> component swcs which only output for JS and include the component list
>>>> from the manifest?
>>>>
>>>> Any tips on getting this to work?
>
>
>
