I started a separate document with thoughts on typedefs. 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gQTI08o5OJwawpludknyAX8oaa7quOZP9fridJWsKgg/edit?usp=sharing
 
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gQTI08o5OJwawpludknyAX8oaa7quOZP9fridJWsKgg/edit?usp=sharing>

The doc is editable. Feel free to add to it and make changes and corrections.

It’s possible there is currently a way to specify source externs that I’m not 
aware of.

My goal with my typedef thoughts are:
1. Make typedefs easier to use.
2. Improve type safety and easy of use with literal objects and JSON.
3. Produce reliable output even after minification.

Thanks,
Harbs

> On Jan 11, 2019, at 4:39 AM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> FWIW, we already support source externs.
> 
> On 1/10/19, 2:38 PM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>    I very much would like for AS3 to get an upgrade with features. That 
> applies to improvements I the compiler output as well as truly new features 
> in the language.
> 
>    I’ve started some discussion with Josh on the topic, and we started a 
> Google doc to use to help figure out how we can incrementally improve things.
> 
>    The link to the Google Doc is here: 
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F188AAeny3y7bht9JbuE-RXIF_adZHP5uYj0--RANpGNM%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C23cdd9000eb047a61a3608d6774c65c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636827567358790309&amp;sdata=JKz7zftxQMkt9o3DPwoqK5xYh8u546a%2Ff0AAtLKc1xQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
>  
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F188AAeny3y7bht9JbuE-RXIF_adZHP5uYj0--RANpGNM%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C23cdd9000eb047a61a3608d6774c65c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636827567358790309&amp;sdata=JKz7zftxQMkt9o3DPwoqK5xYh8u546a%2Ff0AAtLKc1xQ%3D&amp;reserved=0>
> 
>    I enabled commenting. If someone wants edit access to the document, please 
> let me know.
> 
>    Thanks,
>    Harbs
> 

Reply via email to