I'm not sure I understood what we were supposed to get from these links, but to 
me, the links took me to web pages that would inspire me to write a component 
that leverage the Royale/Flex item renderer approach.  The component would take 
a dataProvider of tab names and an optional renderer, and decide how many tabs 
to display and put the rest in a dropdown.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 1/22/19, 11:06 AM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> wrote:

    I’m implementing this:
    
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fopensource.adobe.com%2Fspectrum-css%2F2.7.2%2Fdocs%2F%23tabs---too-many&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb2ca84c0e51e48fd211d08d6809cc69d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636837808176618943&amp;sdata=2Ecyk7Cp5FGYZe9AQMl483NUZjeWVdGz85D5kcO4Fqk%3D&amp;reserved=0
 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fopensource.adobe.com%2Fspectrum-css%2F2.7.2%2Fdocs%2F%23tabs---too-many&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb2ca84c0e51e48fd211d08d6809cc69d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636837808176618943&amp;sdata=2Ecyk7Cp5FGYZe9AQMl483NUZjeWVdGz85D5kcO4Fqk%3D&amp;reserved=0>
    
    The current display is not the latest. In the current implementation, the 
dropdown is structured like this:
    
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fadobe%2Fspectrum-css%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fdocs%2Ftabs%2Ftabs-toomany.yml&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb2ca84c0e51e48fd211d08d6809cc69d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636837808176618943&amp;sdata=Ivj65MKusePHnFknH2GmN36KUkAlcN6kSI67Sj3m8W8%3D&amp;reserved=0
 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fadobe%2Fspectrum-css%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fdocs%2Ftabs%2Ftabs-toomany.yml&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb2ca84c0e51e48fd211d08d6809cc69d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636837808176618943&amp;sdata=Ivj65MKusePHnFknH2GmN36KUkAlcN6kSI67Sj3m8W8%3D&amp;reserved=0>
    
    While the normal structure is like this:
    
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fadobe%2Fspectrum-css%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fdocs%2Ftabs%2Ftabs.yml&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb2ca84c0e51e48fd211d08d6809cc69d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636837808176618943&amp;sdata=tPTgBjxwvZNyX4NfY358PS%2B9zRKjRl9SSwGT%2B23IxOI%3D&amp;reserved=0
 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fadobe%2Fspectrum-css%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fdocs%2Ftabs%2Ftabs.yml&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb2ca84c0e51e48fd211d08d6809cc69d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636837808176618943&amp;sdata=tPTgBjxwvZNyX4NfY358PS%2B9zRKjRl9SSwGT%2B23IxOI%3D&amp;reserved=0>
    
    The spectrum css requires a specific structure, so I can’t use media 
queries.
    
    FWIW, [DefaultProperty] does what we want.
    
    Thanks Alex,
    Harbs
    
    > On Jan 22, 2019, at 8:51 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    > 
    > Hi,
    > 
    > So if I understand right: You want a tabbar navigation that when the user
    > goes to mobile or shrinks the browser changes the visual to a dropdown
    > right?
    > 
    > For me the change should not happen at the level you are proposing. The
    > component declaration in MXML is the same for both views (the data and
    > structure), you only want to change representation.
    > And for me that's in the realm of CSS with responsiveness. So doing a 
media
    > query in CSS to arrange things in a way or another depending on the width
    > of the browser window.
    > 
    > That's the same we do in Jewel for Drawer, NumericStepper, ComboBox, and
    > more...
    > 
    > HTH
    > 
    > Carlos
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > El mar., 22 ene. 2019 a las 17:43, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
    > escribió:
    > 
    >> The compiler supports a special property called mxmlContent that defers
    >> the creation of the MXML tags assigned to that property until a bit later
    >> in the lifecycle in order to try to make sure other properties are set up
    >> before the children in the mxmlContent are.  All other mxml tags are
    >> created at constructor time.  mxmlContent is the [DefaultProperty] of
    >> Royale containers so instead having everyone type "mxmlContent" tags over
    >> and over again, you just skip having to type "mxmlContent".
    >> 
    >> So, one option is to define other properties to hold other sets of
    >> children.  They will be instantiated at constructor time, but you can 
store
    >> them anywhere.  IMO, it is bad practice to store UI widgets in the model,
    >> but some components have both a data model and a presentation model that
    >> holds things that are about the view (DataGrid rowHeight for example) and
    >> not about the data itself.
    >> 
    >> Another option is to think of this component like a Navigator like
    >> ViewStack.  Then you'd have two containers in the mxmlContent, one that
    >> holds the tabs or the tabbar itself and another that holds the "complex 
one
    >> with a dropdown".
    >> 
    >> Yet another option is to think of it sort of like Panel.  Panel has both 
a
    >> TitleBar and mxmlContent.  You can specify a completely different 
TitleBar
    >> for a Panel.
    >> 
    >> HTH,
    >> -Alex
    >> 
    >> On 1/22/19, 1:12 AM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> 
    >>    We are working on a component which has two (very different) views
    >> depending on available space.
    >> 
    >>    I’d like to have some markup which would look like this:
    >>    <foo:TabBar>
    >>    <foo:Tab text=“Tab 1”/>
    >>    <foo:Tab text=“Tab 2”/>
    >>    <foo:Tab text=“Tab 3”/>
    >>    <foo:Tab text=“Tab 4”/>
    >>    </foo:TabBar>
    >> 
    >>    The internal structure would change from a relatively simple one to a
    >> complex one with a dropdown when there’s little space.
    >> 
    >>    I’d like to have a TabModel which would have an array of the tabs
    >> specified. I’d have a separate view which is responsible for actually
    >> adding the elements. My question is how to have the MXML children added 
to
    >> the model instead of the default behavior where they are added as 
elements.
    >> 
    >>    Thanks,
    >>    Harbs
    >> 
    >> 
    > 
    > -- 
    > Carlos Rovira
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb2ca84c0e51e48fd211d08d6809cc69d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636837808176618943&amp;sdata=sHGQzDEwTQfosU1MpZ17r00zyBEyBPpdz%2ByuIrtOUqE%3D&amp;reserved=0
    
    

Reply via email to