Carlos, I see following comment in FormItemView:
"// Look for a layout and/or viewport bead on the formItem's beads list. If one // is found, pull it off so it will not be added permanently // to the strand." Why beads from strand is being removed ? It's because it was reused in other places ? Thanks, Piotr pt., 25 sty 2019 o 16:24 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]> napisał(a): > And I forgot to add that IBeadLayout is working fine. > > pt., 25 sty 2019 o 16:23 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]> > napisał(a): > >> I won't follow Flex, so if you would like to do this I'm fine. I'm going >> to implement my own View in my application. I won't commit it to Royale. >> However I would like to fix issue with layout. Currently IBeadLayout - Is >> making whole FormItem vertical or horizontal. *IFormItemLayout - Should >> treat content appropriately, but it doesn't do anything. I would like to >> change it in the following way:* >> >> *IBeadLayout do:* >> >> *1) When user: IBeadLayout: >> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.VerticalLayout");* >> L >> C >> *2) When user: **IBeadLayout: >> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.HorizontalLayout");* >> *L C* >> >> *IFormItemLayout will do:* >> 1) IFormItemLayout: >> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.HorizontalLayout"); >> and #1 - *IBeadLayout* >> L >> C - Set children Horizotnally >> 2) IFormItemLayout: >> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.HorizontalLayout"); >> and #2 - *IBeadLayout* >> *L* >> *C - Set children Vertically* >> >> *Thoughts ?* >> >> Piotr >> >> >> >> pt., 25 sty 2019 o 16:13 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> >> napisał(a): >> >>> Ops!, >>> >>> ok, since I was using the other layout I was in the believe that was the >>> standard. So if we want to follow flex, we can change the current as >>> well. >>> >>> El jue., 24 ene. 2019 a las 18:34, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>> [email protected]>) escribió: >>> >>> > Nope - I just checked [1] - Code [2] - You are showing me some custom >>> > implementation. >>> > >>> > [1] https://imgur.com/INKlfcC >>> > [2] https://paste.apache.org/jyrl >>> > >>> > czw., 24 sty 2019 o 18:20 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> >>> > napisał(a): >>> > >>> > > Piotr, >>> > > >>> > > in Flex we have the same align (as we have now in Royale), check this >>> > > image: url >>> > > < >>> > > >>> > >>> https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi1uZfN9obgAhVFuVkKHeyzC0MQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fbutterfliesandbugs.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F03%2F29%2Fusing-a-spark-form-with-validators%2F&psig=AOvVaw0vM1bn9Ehq9ZHLqtzJ-gc1&ust=1548436757385249 >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > El jue., 24 ene. 2019 a las 18:03, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>> > > [email protected]>) escribió: >>> > > >>> > > > If we are going in that direction it requires as well work were >>> > indicator >>> > > > in case of L* C (current implementation) will be changed to L C* - >>> Yes >>> > ? >>> > > - >>> > > > Being consistent it should be like that. >>> > > > >>> > > > I'm not sure what the trends are in that case. >>> > > > >>> > > > czw., 24 sty 2019 o 17:51 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> >>> > > > napisał(a): >>> > > > >>> > > > > Hi Piotr, >>> > > > > >>> > > > > since is what you show in the flex version. >>> > > > > I think Adobe put side to content instead of side to label since >>> the >>> > > user >>> > > > > fill the content elements and if not filled and required , the >>> > tooltip >>> > > > > should popup there. >>> > > > > IOW, for usability, seems more appropriated the way flex >>> layedout, or >>> > > > seems >>> > > > > more natural. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > El jue., 24 ene. 2019 a las 17:30, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>> > > > > [email protected]>) escribió: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > Carlos, >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Why you are proposing have that? >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > L >>> > > > > > C * >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > I'm in favor of staying >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > L * >>> > > > > > C >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Thanks, >>> > > > > > Piotr >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019, 4:56 PM Carlos Rovira < >>> > [email protected] >>> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > I forgot to mention about IBeadLayout more, since it could be >>> > > > > > > misinterpreted: >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > IBeadLayout for the global component is important, but what >>> I'm >>> > > > > > considering >>> > > > > > > is that although we can put HorizontalLayout (for the current >>> > > > > FormtItem) >>> > > > > > > and VerticalLayout (for the stacked), I'm seeing that many >>> > > components >>> > > > > > would >>> > > > > > > need its own layout class. In this case we could create a >>> > > > > FormItemLayout, >>> > > > > > > and this will handle the layout vía CSS as it happens mostly >>> in >>> > > many >>> > > > > > other >>> > > > > > > Jewel component. >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > (Just say that some of them are using an standard layout >>> class, >>> > > like >>> > > > > > > HorizontalLayout, or even a NullLayout class), since I didn't >>> > have >>> > > > the >>> > > > > > time >>> > > > > > > to create its own one, and that's temporal. But my plan is to >>> > > create >>> > > > a >>> > > > > > > concrete layout for some of this components. FormItem could >>> be >>> > one >>> > > of >>> > > > > > those >>> > > > > > > cases, for what we're seeing >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > El jue., 24 ene. 2019 a las 16:50, Carlos Rovira (< >>> > > > > > [email protected] >>> > > > > > > >) >>> > > > > > > escribió: >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Hi Piotr, >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > looking at the screen shot, seems the required indicator is >>> > > > > positioned >>> > > > > > to >>> > > > > > > > the right side of the element, what seems coherent, >>> although >>> > > could >>> > > > > be a >>> > > > > > > bit >>> > > > > > > > problematic depending on the width of the component. we >>> assume >>> > a >>> > > > > fixed >>> > > > > > > > width (to the widest element) and align all required (or >>> not a >>> > > put >>> > > > > the >>> > > > > > > > required indicator just before the element, anyway this >>> seems >>> > > > > something >>> > > > > > > to >>> > > > > > > > be solved as we have some real implementation. >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > In order to implement it: >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > We have 3 parts: >>> > > > > > > > - L (this is the label) >>> > > > > > > > - * (this is the required indicator) >>> > > > > > > > - C (this is the element(s) that the user adds) >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > * Actual FormItem is : >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > L * C >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > * We want for the new >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > L >>> > > > > > > > C * >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > So it seems to me that >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > a) IBeadLayout: ClassReference( >>> > > > > > > > "org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.HorizontalLayout") >>> > > > > > > > Does not has much sense to me >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > b) IFormItemLayout: ClassReference( >>> > > > > > > > "org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.VerticalLayout") >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > This is the one important to me (to configure), so user can >>> > > change >>> > > > > > layout >>> > > > > > > > of the content part >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > c) IBeadView: ClassReference( >>> > > > > > > > "org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.views.FormItemView") >>> > > > > > > > IFormItemContentArea: >>> > > > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.Group") >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > These are the parts important to me. >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > I think we really want to change only the IBeadView, so we >>> can >>> > > > have a >>> > > > > > > > FormItemView and a StackedFormItemView, and could change >>> it vía >>> > > > > > className >>> > > > > > > > (for example) >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Let me know your thought about it >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > thanks >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Carlos >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > El jue., 24 ene. 2019 a las 16:08, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>> > > > > > > > [email protected]>) escribió: >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> Carlos, >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> I have analyzed FormItem in Flex and here is how it is >>> done >>> > > there. >>> > > > > > > >> StackedFormItemSkin is using FormItemLayout which is >>> > constrained >>> > > > > into >>> > > > > > 3 >>> > > > > > > >> columns (sequenceCol, contentCol and helpCol) and 2 rows. >>> > [1][2] >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> When you look into the screenshot [2] you may think that >>> > reuired >>> > > > > > > indicator >>> > > > > > > >> is part of the content, but it's not. It's not even part >>> of >>> > the >>> > > > > layout >>> > > > > > > >> cause it has includeInLayout="false". [3] >>> > > > > > > >> In Royale we don't have concept that something doesn't >>> belong >>> > to >>> > > > > > layout >>> > > > > > > >> and >>> > > > > > > >> is not calculated and indicator default is being placed in >>> > > > different >>> > > > > > > area. >>> > > > > > > >> Do you have some idea apart what I have proposed how to >>> > resolve >>> > > > > that ? >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> [1] https://paste.apache.org/9Imj >>> > > > > > > >> [2] https://imgur.com/GGOtzEU >>> > > > > > > >> [3] https://paste.apache.org/kqlP >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> Thanks, >>> > > > > > > >> Piotr >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> śr., 23 sty 2019 o 18:08 Piotr Zarzycki < >>> > > > [email protected]> >>> > > > > > > >> napisał(a): >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> > That's more clear to me. I will check and get back to >>> you. >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > Thank you! >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > śr., 23 sty 2019 o 18:03 Carlos Rovira < >>> > > [email protected] >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > napisał(a): >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> >> No, >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> I was asking you about how flex solves visualy the >>> problem >>> > in >>> > > > > their >>> > > > > > > >> >> stacked >>> > > > > > > >> >> version. The required icon is setup next to the label? >>> is >>> > in >>> > > > > other >>> > > > > > > >> place? >>> > > > > > > >> >> if we had an image of how it is designed (and like >>> it), we >>> > > can >>> > > > > copy >>> > > > > > > >> it. I >>> > > > > > > >> >> still not proposing a technical solution. Just that I >>> don't >>> > > > have >>> > > > > > > clear >>> > > > > > > >> how >>> > > > > > > >> >> we should layout it >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> El mié., 23 ene. 2019 a las 17:29, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>> > > > > > > >> >> [email protected]>) escribió: >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > Carlos, >>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > Your suggestion is to have new form item >>> > (StackedFormItem) >>> > > > with >>> > > > > > new >>> > > > > > > >> >> > StackedFormItemView - cause problem is inside >>> > FormitemView, >>> > > > not >>> > > > > > > >> inside >>> > > > > > > >> >> > layout itself. Current layout is doing what it >>> should do >>> > - >>> > > > > apart >>> > > > > > of >>> > > > > > > >> the >>> > > > > > > >> >> > problem - it's making children to be >>> Horizontal/Vertical. >>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > If I'm correct what you are saying - that's ok, but >>> if >>> > you >>> > > > have >>> > > > > > had >>> > > > > > > >> >> > different idea by saying above let me know. >>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks, Piotr >>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > śr., 23 sty 2019 o 17:14 Carlos Rovira < >>> > > > > [email protected]> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > napisał(a): >>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > Ok, I understand now. >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > In Flex I think we had that layout and was >>> > > > > > > >> called....StackedFormItem >>> > > > > > > >> >> or >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > something like that? >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > Could you check how Flex solve this? If we continue >>> > > liking >>> > > > > the >>> > > > > > > way >>> > > > > > > >> >> > stacked >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > form layout in flex looks, we can do the same for >>> our >>> > > > Royale >>> > > > > > > >> version >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > El mié., 23 ene. 2019 a las 16:38, Piotr Zarzycki >>> (< >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > [email protected]>) escribió: >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > I'm not sure how Serkan is doing that on users >>> forum, >>> > > > but I >>> > > > > > see >>> > > > > > > >> all >>> > > > > > > >> >> > hist >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > pasted images. Anyway here you go: >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > What I wanted to achieve: >>> https://snag.gy/DmH7yk.jpg >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > What I got from Jewel FormItem: >>> > > > https://snag.gy/Slfbt9.jpg >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > śr., 23 sty 2019 o 16:28 Carlos Rovira < >>> > > > > > > [email protected]> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > napisał(a): >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Piotr, >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > remember that images pasted in list are not >>> shared, >>> > > you >>> > > > > > must >>> > > > > > > >> share >>> > > > > > > >> >> > with >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > some image service >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > El mié., 23 ene. 2019 a las 16:14, Piotr >>> Zarzycki >>> > (< >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > [email protected]>) escribió: >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > There is one more problem with Layout. >>> Currently >>> > > > > default >>> > > > > > in >>> > > > > > > >> >> > framework >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > we >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > have [1]. It means that: >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > My content of FormItem will be vertical and >>> > > > IBeadLayout >>> > > > > > is >>> > > > > > > >> >> > basically >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > ignored at some point. If I specify beads - >>> > > > > > > HorizontalLayout >>> > > > > > > >> as >>> > > > > > > >> >> it >>> > > > > > > >> >> > is >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > in >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > above example it will be taken as a primary >>> and I >>> > > > have >>> > > > > my >>> > > > > > > >> >> content >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > laying >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > out horizontally. The question is - what is >>> for >>> > > > > > > >> >> IFormItemLayout in >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > default.css? Is it a bug? >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > [1] https://paste.apache.org/rV0K >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > śr., 23 sty 2019 o 15:46 Piotr Zarzycki < >>> > > > > > > >> >> [email protected] >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > napisał(a): >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Hi Carlos, >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> I'm was trying to change FormItem to be >>> Vertical >>> > > > > > oriented. >>> > > > > > > >> In >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > general >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > I >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> would like to have following view. Label of >>> > > FormItem >>> > > > > is >>> > > > > > on >>> > > > > > > >> the >>> > > > > > > >> >> top >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > and >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > in >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> the bottom is content. >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> [image: image.png] >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Code for that will looks like that [1]. >>> Results >>> > is >>> > > > > > > >> following: >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> [image: image.png] >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> It happened cause Label and required star >>> label >>> > > are >>> > > > > > > >> different >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > components >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> - everything is being laying out vertically. >>> > What >>> > > is >>> > > > > > your >>> > > > > > > >> >> > suggestion >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > to >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > fix >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> that ? >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Mine is wrapping "First name" and "*" into >>> one >>> > > Group >>> > > > > > with >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> HorizontalLayout. >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> More thoughts are welcome. I hope you see >>> > > > screenshots. >>> > > > > > :) >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> [1] https://paste.apache.org/5odt >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Thanks, >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> -- >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Piotr Zarzycki >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Patreon: * >>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > -- >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Patreon: * >>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > -- >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Carlos Rovira >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -- >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Piotr Zarzycki >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > -- >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > Carlos Rovira >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira >>> > > > > > > >> >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > -- >>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > Piotr Zarzycki >>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> >> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>> > > > > > > >> >> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> -- >>> > > > > > > >> >> Carlos Rovira >>> > > > > > > >> >> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > -- >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > Piotr Zarzycki >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>> > > > > > > >> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> -- >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> Piotr Zarzycki >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>> > > > > > > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > -- >>> > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira >>> > > > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > -- >>> > > > > > > Carlos Rovira >>> > > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > -- >>> > > > > Carlos Rovira >>> > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > -- >>> > > > >>> > > > Piotr Zarzycki >>> > > > >>> > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>> > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Carlos Rovira >>> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > Piotr Zarzycki >>> > >>> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Carlos Rovira >>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >> > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
