In my opinion this part should looks like that:
https://paste.apache.org/gbn2 - Simple initialization. If someone would
like to use anything more than default (currently it's IFormItemContentArea:
ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.Group"); ) - He can use it - for
example HGroup.

What do you think ?

sob., 26 sty 2019 o 12:58 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>
napisał(a):

> Remember I'm talking above only about contentArea of FormItem.
>
> sob., 26 sty 2019 o 12:57 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>
> napisał(a):
>
>> Carlos,
>>
>> I think I got it. It looks like we don't need IFormItemLayout as you
>> said, cause I should be able to manipulate content of my FormItem by doing
>> that:
>>
>> IBeadLayout:
>> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.HorizontalLayout");
>> IFormItemContentArea: ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.HGroup");
>>
>> However above code won't work cause you have this [1] - transferLayoutBead
>> is being added to contentArea you have now in output code for content area
>> something weird. [2]
>>
>> To me IBeadLayout - shouldn't be transfered to content - Are you agree ?
>>
>> [1] https://paste.apache.org/m9ST
>> [2] https://paste.apache.org/9Orx
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>>
>> sob., 26 sty 2019 o 12:18 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
>> napisał(a):
>>
>>> Piotr, I think I don't think we need and IFormItemLayout.
>>> IBeadLayout seems sufficient for me, since that layout will be based just
>>> on css selectors that are in the end what solves the layout
>>>
>>> El sáb., 26 ene. 2019 a las 12:00, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>> [email protected]>) escribió:
>>>
>>> > Too bad that you didn't understand me. Just question to above
>>> requirements
>>> > - What in your opinion should do layout added trough ->
>>> *IFormItemLayout
>>> > ?*
>>> >
>>> > sob., 26 sty 2019 o 11:54 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
>>> > napisał(a):
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Piotr,
>>> > >
>>> > > Don't think if I understand right your exposition. I'll try to write
>>> in
>>> > > words what I expect from a FormItemLayout and let me know if we're
>>> > thinking
>>> > > on the same.
>>> > >
>>> > > We want to have a specialized layout for FormItem that support
>>> horizontal
>>> > > and stacked form item layouts. At this point we can choose to have 2
>>> > > layouts or only 1.
>>> > > Since we always have 2, maybe that's the best way to go :
>>> > > HorizontalFormItemLayout and VerticalFormItemLayout.
>>> > >
>>> > > HorizontalFormItemLayout: should put label, required indicator and
>>> > content
>>> > > in the same "row", o mostly as HorizontalLayout does, and will be
>>> equal
>>> > to
>>> > > what we have now.
>>> > >
>>> > > VerticalFormItemLayout should put Label followed by
>>> requiredIndicator in
>>> > a
>>> > > row and just below, the content part. *Or* Label in a row and below
>>> > Content
>>> > > followed by requited Indicator
>>> > > (I think this should be configurable in some way, or implement a
>>> case and
>>> > > made and additional layout for the other, so we can have both).
>>> > >
>>> > > Some technical needs:
>>> > >
>>> > > * All we'll be solved using CSS and css class selectors as with the
>>> rest
>>> > of
>>> > > Jewel Layouts and phyloshopy
>>> > > * We'll continue using flexbox since is the standard in Jewel
>>> > > * We can use the flexbox order to have a property that puts content
>>> > before
>>> > > required indicator or viceversa using a property in the layout.
>>> > > * I think FormItemView would need to adapt to this, and maybe will
>>> need
>>> > two
>>> > > Views to support each layout (don't have clear now)
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > El vie., 25 ene. 2019 a las 16:23, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>> > > [email protected]>) escribió:
>>> > >
>>> > > > I won't follow Flex, so if you would like to do this I'm fine. I'm
>>> > going
>>> > > to
>>> > > > implement my own View in my application. I won't commit it to
>>> Royale.
>>> > > > However I would like to fix issue with layout. Currently
>>> IBeadLayout -
>>> > Is
>>> > > > making whole FormItem vertical or horizontal. *IFormItemLayout -
>>> Should
>>> > > > treat content appropriately, but it doesn't do anything. I would
>>> like
>>> > to
>>> > > > change it in the following way:*
>>> > > >
>>> > > > *IBeadLayout do:*
>>> > > >
>>> > > > *1) When user: IBeadLayout:
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.VerticalLayout");*
>>> > > > L
>>> > > > C
>>> > > > *2) When user: **IBeadLayout:
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.HorizontalLayout");*
>>> > > > *L C*
>>> > > >
>>> > > > *IFormItemLayout will do:*
>>> > > > 1) IFormItemLayout:
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.HorizontalLayout");
>>> > > > and #1 - *IBeadLayout*
>>> > > > L
>>> > > > C - Set children Horizotnally
>>> > > > 2) IFormItemLayout:
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.HorizontalLayout");
>>> > > > and #2 - *IBeadLayout*
>>> > > > *L*
>>> > > > *C - Set children Vertically*
>>> > > >
>>> > > > *Thoughts ?*
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Piotr
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > pt., 25 sty 2019 o 16:13 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
>>> > > > napisał(a):
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Ops!,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > ok, since I was using the other layout I was in the believe that
>>> was
>>> > > the
>>> > > > > standard. So if we want to follow flex, we can change the
>>> current as
>>> > > > well.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > El jue., 24 ene. 2019 a las 18:34, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>> > > > > [email protected]>) escribió:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Nope - I just checked [1] - Code [2] - You are showing me some
>>> > custom
>>> > > > > > implementation.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > [1] https://imgur.com/INKlfcC
>>> > > > > > [2] https://paste.apache.org/jyrl
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > czw., 24 sty 2019 o 18:20 Carlos Rovira <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> > > > > > napisał(a):
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Piotr,
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > in Flex we have the same align (as we have now in Royale),
>>> check
>>> > > this
>>> > > > > > > image: url
>>> > > > > > > <
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi1uZfN9obgAhVFuVkKHeyzC0MQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fbutterfliesandbugs.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F03%2F29%2Fusing-a-spark-form-with-validators%2F&psig=AOvVaw0vM1bn9Ehq9ZHLqtzJ-gc1&ust=1548436757385249
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > El jue., 24 ene. 2019 a las 18:03, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>> > > > > > > [email protected]>) escribió:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > If we are going in that direction it requires as well work
>>> were
>>> > > > > > indicator
>>> > > > > > > > in case of L* C (current implementation) will be changed
>>> to L
>>> > C*
>>> > > -
>>> > > > > Yes
>>> > > > > > ?
>>> > > > > > > -
>>> > > > > > > > Being consistent it should be like that.
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > I'm not sure what the trends are in that case.
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > czw., 24 sty 2019 o 17:51 Carlos Rovira <
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > > > > napisał(a):
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > Hi Piotr,
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > since is what you show in the flex version.
>>> > > > > > > > > I think Adobe put side to content instead of side to
>>> label
>>> > > since
>>> > > > > the
>>> > > > > > > user
>>> > > > > > > > > fill the content elements and if not filled and required
>>> ,
>>> > the
>>> > > > > > tooltip
>>> > > > > > > > > should popup there.
>>> > > > > > > > > IOW, for usability, seems more appropriated the way flex
>>> > > > layedout,
>>> > > > > or
>>> > > > > > > > seems
>>> > > > > > > > > more natural.
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > El jue., 24 ene. 2019 a las 17:30, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>> > > > > > > > > [email protected]>) escribió:
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > Carlos,
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > Why you are proposing have that?
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > L
>>> > > > > > > > > > C *
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > I'm in favor of staying
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > L *
>>> > > > > > > > > > C
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > > > > Piotr
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019, 4:56 PM Carlos Rovira <
>>> > > > > > [email protected]
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > I forgot to mention about IBeadLayout more, since it
>>> > could
>>> > > be
>>> > > > > > > > > > > misinterpreted:
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > IBeadLayout for the global component is important,
>>> but
>>> > what
>>> > > > I'm
>>> > > > > > > > > > considering
>>> > > > > > > > > > > is that although we can put HorizontalLayout (for the
>>> > > current
>>> > > > > > > > > FormtItem)
>>> > > > > > > > > > > and VerticalLayout (for the stacked), I'm seeing that
>>> > many
>>> > > > > > > components
>>> > > > > > > > > > would
>>> > > > > > > > > > > need its own layout class. In this case we could
>>> create a
>>> > > > > > > > > FormItemLayout,
>>> > > > > > > > > > > and this will handle the layout vía CSS as it happens
>>> > > mostly
>>> > > > in
>>> > > > > > > many
>>> > > > > > > > > > other
>>> > > > > > > > > > > Jewel component.
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > (Just say that some of them are using an standard
>>> layout
>>> > > > class,
>>> > > > > > > like
>>> > > > > > > > > > > HorizontalLayout, or even a NullLayout class), since
>>> I
>>> > > didn't
>>> > > > > > have
>>> > > > > > > > the
>>> > > > > > > > > > time
>>> > > > > > > > > > > to create its own one, and that's temporal. But my
>>> plan
>>> > is
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > > > create
>>> > > > > > > > a
>>> > > > > > > > > > > concrete layout for some of this components. FormItem
>>> > could
>>> > > > be
>>> > > > > > one
>>> > > > > > > of
>>> > > > > > > > > > those
>>> > > > > > > > > > > cases, for what we're seeing
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > El jue., 24 ene. 2019 a las 16:50, Carlos Rovira (<
>>> > > > > > > > > > [email protected]
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >)
>>> > > > > > > > > > > escribió:
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Piotr,
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > looking at the screen shot, seems the required
>>> > indicator
>>> > > is
>>> > > > > > > > > positioned
>>> > > > > > > > > > to
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > the right side of the element, what seems coherent,
>>> > > > although
>>> > > > > > > could
>>> > > > > > > > > be a
>>> > > > > > > > > > > bit
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > problematic depending on the width of the
>>> component. we
>>> > > > > assume
>>> > > > > > a
>>> > > > > > > > > fixed
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > width (to the widest element) and align all
>>> required
>>> > (or
>>> > > > not
>>> > > > > a
>>> > > > > > > put
>>> > > > > > > > > the
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > required indicator just before the element, anyway
>>> this
>>> > > > seems
>>> > > > > > > > > something
>>> > > > > > > > > > > to
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > be solved as we have some real implementation.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > In order to implement it:
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > We have 3 parts:
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > - L (this is the label)
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > - * (this is the required indicator)
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > - C (this is the element(s) that the user adds)
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > * Actual FormItem is :
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > L * C
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > * We want for the new
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > L
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > C *
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > So it seems to me that
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > a) IBeadLayout: ClassReference(
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > "org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.HorizontalLayout")
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > Does not has much sense to me
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > b) IFormItemLayout: ClassReference(
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> "org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.VerticalLayout")
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > This is the one important to me (to configure), so
>>> user
>>> > > can
>>> > > > > > > change
>>> > > > > > > > > > layout
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > of the content part
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > c) IBeadView: ClassReference(
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > "org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.views.FormItemView")
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > IFormItemContentArea:
>>> > > > > > > > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.Group")
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > These are the parts important to me.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > I think we really want to change only the
>>> IBeadView, so
>>> > > we
>>> > > > > can
>>> > > > > > > > have a
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > FormItemView and a StackedFormItemView, and could
>>> > change
>>> > > it
>>> > > > > vía
>>> > > > > > > > > > className
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > (for example)
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know your thought about it
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > thanks
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > Carlos
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > El jue., 24 ene. 2019 a las 16:08, Piotr Zarzycki
>>> (<
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]>) escribió:
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> Carlos,
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> I have analyzed FormItem in Flex and here is how
>>> it is
>>> > > > done
>>> > > > > > > there.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> StackedFormItemSkin is using FormItemLayout which
>>> is
>>> > > > > > constrained
>>> > > > > > > > > into
>>> > > > > > > > > > 3
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> columns (sequenceCol, contentCol and helpCol) and
>>> 2
>>> > > rows.
>>> > > > > > [1][2]
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> When you look into the screenshot [2] you may
>>> think
>>> > that
>>> > > > > > reuired
>>> > > > > > > > > > > indicator
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> is part of the content, but it's not. It's not
>>> even
>>> > part
>>> > > > of
>>> > > > > > the
>>> > > > > > > > > layout
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> cause it has includeInLayout="false". [3]
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> In Royale we don't have concept that something
>>> doesn't
>>> > > > > belong
>>> > > > > > to
>>> > > > > > > > > > layout
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> and
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> is not calculated and indicator default is being
>>> > placed
>>> > > in
>>> > > > > > > > different
>>> > > > > > > > > > > area.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> Do you have some idea apart what I have proposed
>>> how
>>> > to
>>> > > > > > resolve
>>> > > > > > > > > that ?
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> [1] https://paste.apache.org/9Imj
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> [2] https://imgur.com/GGOtzEU
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> [3] https://paste.apache.org/kqlP
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> Piotr
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> śr., 23 sty 2019 o 18:08 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> > > > > > > > [email protected]>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> napisał(a):
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > That's more clear to me. I will check and get
>>> back
>>> > to
>>> > > > you.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Thank you!
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > śr., 23 sty 2019 o 18:03 Carlos Rovira <
>>> > > > > > > [email protected]
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > napisał(a):
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> No,
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> I was asking you about how flex solves visualy
>>> the
>>> > > > > problem
>>> > > > > > in
>>> > > > > > > > > their
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> stacked
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> version. The required icon is setup next to the
>>> > > label?
>>> > > > is
>>> > > > > > in
>>> > > > > > > > > other
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> place?
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> if we had an image of how it is designed (and
>>> like
>>> > > it),
>>> > > > > we
>>> > > > > > > can
>>> > > > > > > > > copy
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> it. I
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> still not proposing a technical solution. Just
>>> > that I
>>> > > > > don't
>>> > > > > > > > have
>>> > > > > > > > > > > clear
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> how
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> we should layout it
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> El mié., 23 ene. 2019 a las 17:29, Piotr
>>> Zarzycki
>>> > (<
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> [email protected]>) escribió:
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > Carlos,
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > Your suggestion is to have new form item
>>> > > > > > (StackedFormItem)
>>> > > > > > > > with
>>> > > > > > > > > > new
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > StackedFormItemView - cause problem is inside
>>> > > > > > FormitemView,
>>> > > > > > > > not
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> inside
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > layout itself. Current layout is doing what
>>> it
>>> > > should
>>> > > > > do
>>> > > > > > -
>>> > > > > > > > > apart
>>> > > > > > > > > > of
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> the
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > problem - it's making children to be
>>> > > > > Horizontal/Vertical.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > If I'm correct what you are saying - that's
>>> ok,
>>> > but
>>> > > > if
>>> > > > > > you
>>> > > > > > > > have
>>> > > > > > > > > > had
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > different idea by saying above let me know.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > Thanks, Piotr
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > śr., 23 sty 2019 o 17:14 Carlos Rovira <
>>> > > > > > > > > [email protected]>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > napisał(a):
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > Ok, I understand now.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > In Flex I think we had that layout and was
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> called....StackedFormItem
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> or
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > something like that?
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > Could you check how Flex solve this? If we
>>> > > continue
>>> > > > > > > liking
>>> > > > > > > > > the
>>> > > > > > > > > > > way
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > stacked
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > form layout in flex looks, we can do the
>>> same
>>> > for
>>> > > > our
>>> > > > > > > > Royale
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> version
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > El mié., 23 ene. 2019 a las 16:38, Piotr
>>> > Zarzycki
>>> > > > (<
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > [email protected]>) escribió:
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > I'm not sure how Serkan is doing that on
>>> > users
>>> > > > > forum,
>>> > > > > > > > but I
>>> > > > > > > > > > see
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> all
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > hist
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > pasted images. Anyway here you go:
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > What I wanted to achieve:
>>> > > > > https://snag.gy/DmH7yk.jpg
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > What I got from Jewel FormItem:
>>> > > > > > > > https://snag.gy/Slfbt9.jpg
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > śr., 23 sty 2019 o 16:28 Carlos Rovira <
>>> > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > napisał(a):
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Piotr,
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > remember that images pasted in list
>>> are not
>>> > > > > shared,
>>> > > > > > > you
>>> > > > > > > > > > must
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> share
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > with
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > some image service
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > El mié., 23 ene. 2019 a las 16:14,
>>> Piotr
>>> > > > Zarzycki
>>> > > > > > (<
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > [email protected]>) escribió:
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > There is one more problem with
>>> Layout.
>>> > > > > Currently
>>> > > > > > > > > default
>>> > > > > > > > > > in
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > framework
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > we
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > have [1]. It means that:
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > My content of FormItem will be
>>> vertical
>>> > and
>>> > > > > > > > IBeadLayout
>>> > > > > > > > > > is
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > basically
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > ignored at some point. If I specify
>>> > beads -
>>> > > > > > > > > > > HorizontalLayout
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> as
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> it
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > is
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > in
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > above example it will be taken as a
>>> > primary
>>> > > > > and I
>>> > > > > > > > have
>>> > > > > > > > > my
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> content
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > laying
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > out horizontally. The question is -
>>> what
>>> > is
>>> > > > for
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> IFormItemLayout in
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > default.css? Is it a bug?
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > [1] https://paste.apache.org/rV0K
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > śr., 23 sty 2019 o 15:46 Piotr
>>> Zarzycki <
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> [email protected]
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > napisał(a):
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Hi Carlos,
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> I'm was trying to change FormItem
>>> to be
>>> > > > > Vertical
>>> > > > > > > > > > oriented.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> In
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > general
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > I
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> would like to have following view.
>>> Label
>>> > > of
>>> > > > > > > FormItem
>>> > > > > > > > > is
>>> > > > > > > > > > on
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> the
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> top
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > and
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > in
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> the bottom is content.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> [image: image.png]
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Code for that will looks like that
>>> [1].
>>> > > > > Results
>>> > > > > > is
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> following:
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> [image: image.png]
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> It happened cause Label and required
>>> > star
>>> > > > > label
>>> > > > > > > are
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> different
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > components
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> - everything is being laying out
>>> > > vertically.
>>> > > > > > What
>>> > > > > > > is
>>> > > > > > > > > > your
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > suggestion
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > to
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > fix
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> that ?
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Mine is wrapping "First name" and
>>> "*"
>>> > into
>>> > > > one
>>> > > > > > > Group
>>> > > > > > > > > > with
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> HorizontalLayout.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> More thoughts are welcome. I hope
>>> you
>>> > see
>>> > > > > > > > screenshots.
>>> > > > > > > > > > :)
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> [1] https://paste.apache.org/5odt
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> --
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Patreon: *
>>> > > > > https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> <
>>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> > >*
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > --
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Patreon: *
>>> > > > > https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > <
>>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > --
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Carlos Rovira
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > --
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > Patreon: *
>>> > > https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > --
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > Carlos Rovira
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > --
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > Patreon: *
>>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> --
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> Carlos Rovira
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > --
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> --
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > --
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > --
>>> > > > > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira
>>> > > > > > > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > --
>>> > > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira
>>> > > > > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > --
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> > > > > > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > --
>>> > > > > > > Carlos Rovira
>>> > > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > --
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> > > > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > --
>>> > > > > Carlos Rovira
>>> > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Carlos Rovira
>>> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> >
>>> > Piotr Zarzycki
>>> >
>>> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to