Hi Greg

El jue., 7 mar. 2019 a las 20:41, Greg Dove (<[email protected]>)
escribió:

>
> I think AMF in general should be considered legacy support. I would be
> surprised, for example, if lots of people start using AMF remoting in new
> projects simply because Royale supports it in javascript. I suspect they
> are more likely to use json or protobuf etc for newer projects.
>
>
don't want to "un-focus" the thread, but I continue thinking that AMF is
far better for structured programing.
JSON still lacks typing, and that seems to me a big problem.
Maybe speed, nowadays could be almost the same (although I think when I
search about this topic few months ago that AMF still was more performant)
So, if people uses Royale, and AMF is working great as we have now...don't
see a reason to not go with AMF as a first option.

Just my 2! ;)


> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to