Hi Great to know Royale works with OpenJDK! :)

btw, I think we should not post concrete links just state that folks can
use Oracle Java or OpenJDK, so they can choose what to use.
People like me using HomeBrew or other packages will install OpenJDK (or
any other tool) in other ways, so since there's no one way to install this
kind of packages, I think we should not put concrete links.

thanks

El vie., 19 abr. 2019 a las 18:03, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
escribió:

> Since you’ve validated that it works, it would be great if you can update
> the README.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/19/19, 5:59 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>         I validated that it worked with Flex and Royale compilation.
> Overall it was an easy replacement.
>     -Downloaded the OpenJDK from [1] and unzipped it into a folder.
>     -Updated the JAVA_HOME environmental var.
>     -The system path for the %JAVA_HOME%\bin folder stayed the same since
> it was already using a %var% name.
>
>          I'm fine with choices, it turns out both the Oracle version and
> the Open version are mostly the same anyways.  I just think we should
> update "Building Royale" docs like the README to include the download
> location for the Open version as well.  Since the free Royale download
> should encourage a free Dependency download vice having the pay license
> version as the default.
>
>     [1]
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjdk.java.net%2F12%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C030e49c0e5784d464e1808d6c4c6dbfd%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912755708638463&amp;sdata=hMqN%2Bmeb2OtuhTM83dakRxKqUgrl%2FVJPRjUozrapBJY%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
>
>     -Mark K
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Alex Harui [mailto:[email protected]]
>     Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 12:07 AM
>     To: [email protected]
>     Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Java newer licensing
>
>     IMO, it would be great for volunteers to validate that Royale compiles
> on Open JDK and later Java versions so users have a choice of those as well
> as Java 8 (for a little while longer), and fix any bugs to make it work on
> all 3.  It would be best if we didn't have to pick one official version.
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to