Greensock's source code is available, but it is not a standard open source license. They require a commercial license if your project meets certain conditions.
https://greensock.com/standard-license - Josh On Mon, Jul 8, 2019, 4:36 AM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > one thing I'm investigating in parallel among other things is about how to > make animations easy in Royale. > We have already some infrastructure in the Effects.swc, but this library > has the great point to be very oriented > to Royale with beads and although I didn't tried in SWF, I suppose is > working for Royale JS and SWF. > > In the other hand there's other great JS frameworks out there that brings > many options to this field, but the problem will be > just that: only JS. > > For me the better option would be to create a new library to be used with > UI sets, that brings the power of some programatic JS > lib out there, and concentrate in the JS part in the short term but left > open to SWF for others that want to bring that part to it. > > I think many things nowadays can be done in CSS, or JS or combination of > both. And I like the idea of having most of this in CSS > if possible. I think Web Animations API has both options animations via JS > API and via CSS > > I was interested in Framer [1]. I always liked it. But seems Framer has > turn towards React. Today I could have a call with Framer people > to ask for possibilities to make some Royale lib (as we did for MDL) for > Framer , since although the older version is OS, the newer is still > not, although they want to make it OS. The problems is Framer is very React > oriented, so I think is not a real option. > > Then Framer people kindly point me to Popmotion Pure [2], that seems the > point from where Framer was created. > > I still need to dig a bit into this, but seems a good option (for what I > see). > So, one option could be: > > a) Use Web Animations API: I used this already in Jewel Wizard, and maybe > this is the real option of future > b) Use Popmotion > c) Use GreenShock [3] (I think others here like Harbs pointed to this. I > still didn't look at it, but I think is a payed lib, so maybe not the > better to use) > > What do you think about it? I'd like what others think about all of this > > > > [1] http://framer.com > [2] https://popmotion.io/pure/ > [3] https://greensock.com > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira >
