Many Thanks Andrew, I think is a good start. Looking at the tables, sometimes is difficult to see if we fit in a cell or another, but we can get over it as we released next version. For now I think is ok, and the initial objetive is to be listed :)
Thanks! El sáb., 3 ago. 2019 a las 22:47, Andrew Wetmore (<[email protected]>) escribió: > I have added columns and rows for Apache Royale to this page [1], and have > made a stab at providing data in the cells. I am sure I have missed a bunch > of features we can say YES about, and do not have anything for the earliest > versions of each browser Royale works with, so any improvements anyone can > suggest are most welcome. > > a > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:46 AM Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This page [1] lists a bunch of features and functionality, and whether a > > given framework has/supports it. Can someone check my answers for Apache > > Royale?: > > > > Feature detection: > > DOM wrapped: > > Xml HTMLRequest data retrieval: YES > > Web socket > > Server push data retrieval > > Other data retrieval (xml, html, csv, atom????) > > Drag and drop: YES > > Simple visual effects: YES > > Animation / advanced visual effects > > Back button support / history management > > Input form, widgets, validation: YES > > Grid: YES > > Hierarchical tree: YES > > Rich Text Editor: YES > > Autocompletion tools: > > HTML generation tools: > > Widgets / themeable, skinnable: YES > > GUI resizable panels and modal dialogs: YES??? > > GUI page layout: > > Canvas support: YES > > Mobile/tablet support (touch support): YES > > Accessibility / Graceful degradation: > > ARIA compliant: > > Developer tools, visual design: [the current IDE support does not match > > this, does it?] > > Offline storage: YES > > Cross browser 2d vector graphics: > > Charting and dashboard: YES > > RTL support in UI components: YES > > > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks > > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:15 AM Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> This page lists framework compatibility with various browsers. What is > >> the earliest version of each of the following that the JS that Royale > >> (0.9.4) compiles can work with? > >> > >> IE > >> Firefox > >> Safari > >> Opera > >> Chrome > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:19 AM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Yeah! Very important this kind of things for our future. Thanks for > >>> bringing this and to Andrew for filling it! :) > >>> > >>> El jue., 1 ago. 2019 a las 11:13, Andrew Wetmore (<[email protected] > >) > >>> escribió: > >>> > >>> > That be me. > >>> > > >>> > I will take a look at it! > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:33 AM Piotr Zarzycki < > >>> [email protected]> > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Hi Guys, > >>> > > > >>> > > What do you think about adding Royale to this comparision [1] ? I > >>> > remember > >>> > > that someone from our Team was and Wiki editor, maybe could add > there > >>> > > Royale ? > >>> > > > >>> > > [1] > >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks > >>> > > > >>> > > Thanks, > >>> > > -- > >>> > > > >>> > > Piotr Zarzycki > >>> > > > >>> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > >>> > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > Andrew Wetmore > >>> > > >>> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Carlos Rovira > >>> http://about.me/carlosrovira > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Andrew Wetmore > >> > >> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Andrew Wetmore > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
