Hi, to add to what Greg said in his email: I remember Alex and others talk in some thread (maybe when Royale was FlexJS time) about rise the barrier from IE9 to IE10 at least. Maybe to IE11 too, but I can ensure that. If that's the case, I think compiler and framework was populated with changes that are only supported for that versions. I didn't make a research in flexjs list so I could be wrong.
El mar., 3 sept. 2019 a las 10:00, Greg Dove (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Hi Piotr, > > Royale might work for IE9 for some things, but I think (my opinion) it is > fair to say that it is probably only reliable with IE11 as the base 'IE' > browser. Some as3 language level features or core types may not reasonable > before that. I don't think IE9 had TypedArrays for example, which means > things like BinaryData won't work, and all the AMF remoting stuff etc, as > one example. > > If someone is insisting on IE9 compatibility, then it might be possible to > get there by limiting what you use, or with some es5 polyfills. Polyfills > are standard practice for this type of thing when you need to do it with > React or whatever, but I don't think others are doing this yet with Royale > (I might be wrong). > For the older IE browsers, I assume the flash player will continue to work > if the browser is in a contained environment like some sort of intranet > (which it probably should be), and therefore should continue to run the > original flex app... so when I have spoken to clients about Royale IE > compatibility, IE11 seems to be a common base, with most people (or at > least one of them: me) waiting for it to fade away as soon as possible. But > that doesn't mean that it's easy to convince everybody. > Aside from that, the general problem with older browsers is that actively > supporting them prolongs the 'problem' of needing to support them. At the > moment I would not be inclined to say that Royale supported IE9, and > hesitant about IE10 - but again it depends what you use. Hello World might > work... but that's not really an app. > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:35 PM Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Carlos, > > > > I thought that Royale can work even in IE9. Jewel not but Basic should. I > > recall this information I think when we were FlexJS. > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > wt., 3 wrz 2019 o 09:31 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > napisał(a): > > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > others could say if I'm wrong or not but I think minimum version for IE > > is > > > 11. > > > But take into account that in the case of IE, users always can run > normal > > > old flex version. > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > El mar., 3 sept. 2019 a las 6:13, Chris Velevitch (< > > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > > > > > Does Royale need to use strict? I ask this because IE9 doesn't > support > > > > ES5 use strict. > > > > > > > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 15:41, Carlos Rovira <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > > > > > I think nobody makes a test for this. But Royale uses ES5 at > compiler > > > > > level, so all browsers that support that ES version should work [1] > > > > > > > > > > For Jewel the page is this [2] > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://www.w3schools.com/js/js_versions.asp > > > > > [2] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets/jewel.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El jue., 29 ago. 2019 a las 7:19, Chris Velevitch (< > > > > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a list of supported browsers for non-Jewel based apps? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 23:49, Carlos Rovira < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > today I was testing Jewel in Browserstack to see minimum > versions > > > > > > required > > > > > > > to see Jewel Example without problems. > > > > > > > This is the list: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Desktop > > > > > > > - *Chrome v44* - (released *July,21, 2015*) > > > > > > > - *Firefox v34* - (released *Dec, 1, 2014*) > > > > > > > - *Microsoft Internet Explorer 11 y Edge 15* > > > > > > > - *Safari 11.1, Mac OS X High Sierra, *(released* Feb, 22 > 2018*) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mobile > > > > > > > - *iOS 11. 19 *(release* Sep 2017*) > > > > > > > - *Android 5*, (released, *2014*) , although I think Android > > > devices > > > > can > > > > > > be > > > > > > > very different between manufactures, so maybe is not as easy, I > > > tried > > > > > > with > > > > > > > Samsung Galaxy different models and versions) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll put this info on the wiki > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Chris Velevitch > > > > > > m: 0415 469 095 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > -- > > > > Chris Velevitch > > > > m: 0415 469 095 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
