Thanks for consider it Chris, about you question, I saw it responded in other of your thread by Alex.
Thanks El mié., 9 oct. 2019 a las 9:57, Chris Velevitch (<[email protected]>) escribió: > My apologies. I'll be more thoughtful and considerate in the future. > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 23:32, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Chris, > > before going far beyond, I want that you consider the way you are > referring > > to the concepts you don't share. Talk about that as "silly" seems not > very > > appropriate. > > We try to respect as much as possible, the work and proposals from > others. > > You can disagree, but please maintain a level of respect since that way > > will make others not want to enter the conversation. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 9:47, Chris Velevitch (< > [email protected]>) > > escribió: > > > > > When I was going through the documentation and code to get my head > > > around this silly notation of "beads" and "strands", I realised the > > > component plugins are very similar to the concept of skinning > > > components that Adobe Flex talks about. And there doesn't seem to be > > > any discussions on how to skin a component. > > > > > > I also noticed, there's no discussion on how plugins and components > > > talk to each other and whether that is bidirectional or one-way. > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > -- > > > Chris > -- > Chris Velevitch > m: 0415 469 095 > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
