Hi Piotr, I have a local branch with Jewel ButtonBar and DataGrid. First is finished, second is still WIP. It works with data but visually is still a bit mesh. I think it'll still delay some days to merge the entire branch. At the time of merge I hope to have the working DataGrid but the first level: Data representation and selection. Then I'll move to sorting of columns and finally to editable cells.
About Table: was an early experiment that never had the time to evolve. Hope to have time some day. I'd like to redo some API part to become for standard and remove "selectedItemProperty" since I think is not the way. If you have time, it would be great to do that API change and make it really work since right now table is not fully working with selection of cells. Then implement sorting and editing would be good too if you like. El jue., 5 dic. 2019 a las 18:32, Piotr Zarzycki (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Hi Carlos, > > Is there any branch where you are working on DataGrid - is it possible to > test ? We are using heavily Table in our app, but there are lack of some > features like sortable columns makes me think about trying DataGrid or > implement missing stuff in Table. I'm not in favor of that cause I think > more reach stuff should be handled by DataGrid. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > pon., 25 lis 2019 o 19:23 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]> > napisał(a): > > > I think it would be ok. Move it there. Make sure that basic example of > > DataGrid is working fine. > > > > pon., 25 lis 2019 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > napisał(a): > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> yes I'm working on Jewel DataGrid this days, so this question is around > >> that. It seems to me that the interface seems ok for Basic and Jewel > >> DataGrid, since Jewel use to be based in part on Basic philosophy. So > if I > >> understand correctly, if I use in Jewel I can move it to Core right? > This > >> is still not sure that will be that way > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> > >> > >> El lun., 25 nov. 2019 a las 17:49, Alex Harui (<[email protected] > >> >) > >> escribió: > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > On 11/25/19, 7:48 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > It appears to me like a question of how much energy we want to > >> invest > >> > in abstractions. If we can make a good abstraction that is likely to > be > >> > used in most component sets, then it should belong in Core. But I’m > not > >> > sure if that’s the case for Basic’s IDataGridView. > >> > > >> > +1. And the test is who else needs it. If some other component set > >> does > >> > need it, then it can be moved to core (or maybe a subset of it). > >> DataGrid > >> > is somewhat opinionated which is why it is in Basic for now. I think > >> there > >> > are some 3rd party datagrids that folks might want to use in Royale > that > >> > wouldn't even have a separate view. > >> > > >> > My 2 cents, > >> > -Alex > >> > > >> > From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:[email protected]> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 4:24 PM > >> > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > >> > Subject: IDataGridView in Basic instead of Core > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > is right to have IDataGridView in Basic instead of Core? > >> > We use to have interfaces in Core. > >> > If this is right I can move from one Basic to Core > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Carlos Rovira > >> > > >> > > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C46dd12bf579f45da6b5508d771bef7b0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637102937328803376&sdata=y0846%2BWKLJJg5ybLh2V8ferTrv%2BvCbyfru4VrretfLY%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> Carlos Rovira > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
