Is there an equivalent to Confluence in GitHub?

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 2:00 PM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> for me cwiki and other flex things was the "old way". In Royale we use
> GitHub tools. So the Github wiki is like the Apache cwiki
> Don't need to have the old tools, we even talked about that long time ago
> and decided to go Github way since is what all people are using today.
>
> One thing you can do is migrate things from FlexJS already not migrated to
> Royale Docs, for example this page (to take one):
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/FlexJS+Layout
>
> That content should have an entry in Royale Docs in Features part (Royale
> Layouts). And other here should review if contents need some updating
> But as a starting point I think is ok, changing "FlexJS" for ·"Royale", and
> things like that.
>
> Thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> El mié., 11 dic. 2019 a las 18:49, Andrew Wetmore (<cottag...@gmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
> > Hi:
> >
> > I gather from Infra that Royale does not have its own cwiki (and not its
> > own Confluence??) account. The person I was speaking with suggested we
> > should have our own, rather than piggybacking on the Flex cwiki, not
> least
> > because committers like me (a committer for Royale but not for Flex) can
> > run into problems, as when I could not edit the board report in
> Confluence
> > today.
> >
> > How do we get this organized? I would be happy to help migrate from the
> > Flex cwiki everything that is there that also or primarily applies to
> > Royale.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to