Is this JSDoc file on the internet so I can take a look?

The Royale Externs Compiler uses Google Closure's JavaScript parser because 
externs/typedefs are supposed to be a specially-formatted but valid JavaScript, 
so an AST (different from the one that we generate from MXML/AS) can be created 
from Closure-compatible JavaScript.  It may be possible/better to work from the 
Closure AST in this case.

HTH,
-Alex

On 2/3/20, 6:57 PM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Yes, they do have a jsdoc file. Do you think it would be easier to maintain 
a conversion tool for that?
    ________________________________
    From: Alex Harui <[email protected]>
    Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 8:54:00 PM
    To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
    Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
    Subject: Re: YFiles, EPL, Apache
    
    I think I'm missing something.  Sebastian seemed to be saying there is a 
JSDoc-annotated Javascript file that YFiles maintains.  Josh's tool was for 
d.ts files.   If the JSDoc JS file is compatible with Google Closure's format, 
we might be able to consume that.
    
    -Alex
    
    On 2/3/20, 11:51 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote:
    
        Josh had a tool [1] for converting d.ts to typedefs but he said it was 
a full-time job maintaining it and thus aborted.
    
        [1] 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FBowlerHatLLC%2Fdts2as&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418293642&amp;sdata=7tqKiq1pN2i5e2RC4vT1exZzAr3tSQHCamnog82%2FOYM%3D&amp;reserved=0
        
[https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Favatars3.githubusercontent.com%2Fu%2F13039185%3Fs%3D400%26v%3D4&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418293642&amp;sdata=wKHvUS8Fi%2Bfsh%2F98jAYWMmw6%2Bk%2Bb9041%2BnANm1ZZ9Mk%3D&amp;reserved=0]<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FBowlerHatLLC%2Fdts2as&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418293642&amp;sdata=7tqKiq1pN2i5e2RC4vT1exZzAr3tSQHCamnog82%2FOYM%3D&amp;reserved=0>
        GitHub - BowlerHatLLC/dts2as: Convert TypeScript definitions (d.ts 
files) into ActionScript classes and interfaces for use as external libraries 
with Apache 
FlexJS<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FBowlerHatLLC%2Fdts2as&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418293642&amp;sdata=7tqKiq1pN2i5e2RC4vT1exZzAr3tSQHCamnog82%2FOYM%3D&amp;reserved=0>
        Convert TypeScript definitions (d.ts files) into ActionScript classes 
and interfaces for use as external libraries with Apache FlexJS - 
BowlerHatLLC/dts2as
        github.com
    
        ________________________________
        From: Alex Harui <[email protected]>
        Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 4:40 PM
        To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
        Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: YFiles, EPL, Apache
    
        I'm wondering what the "API definition files" look like.  Maybe we can 
quickly write a tool to generate the typedefs.
    
        -Alex
    
        On 2/3/20, 5:07 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote:
    
            Sebastian, on the subject of derivative work on public repos, you 
might want to contact the author of this [1] externs file. He has a long list 
of externs files [2] that were derived from around 3 years ago from 
DefinitelyTyped [3]. We would, of course, not be using this [1] in light of 
your constraints on derivative work.
    
            [1] 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githubusercontent.com%2Fhonzabrecka%2Fts-to-goog%2Fmaster%2Fexterns%2Fyfiles.extern.js&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418293642&amp;sdata=QqGZvAJ2In9MH1OR%2Bpd74P65mzDy%2F3xRiWxqDog11yw%3D&amp;reserved=0
            [2] 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fhonzabrecka%2Fts-to-goog%2Ftree%2Fmaster%2Fexterns&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418293642&amp;sdata=3Nf%2BCKIJlo4x88fl1TAFBNqQ1Yg4%2BsVpI2n2Mq1Dd30%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fhonzabrecka%2Fts-to-goog&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418293642&amp;sdata=5yXQiFvdKDKrlVbuH%2BW%2BzUurLD7NNSiXoCraOdklufU%3D&amp;reserved=0>
            [3] 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FDefinitelyTyped%2FDefinitelyTyped&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418293642&amp;sdata=XSgjAj%2Bs4RABFx4bFT8tpiC1wlXf04ze9bt2RdTIFho%3D&amp;reserved=0
    
            From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:[email protected]>
            Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 2:57 PM
            To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
            Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
            Subject: RE: YFiles, EPL, Apache
    
            As promised, here is the summary of my correspondence with yFiles.
    
            > My questions to Sebastian from yWorks:
            >
            > a) Would yWorks allow us to create and publish typedefs (think of 
them
            > as Royale d.ts files) in our GitHub repository? I would also need 
to
            > check license issues on the Apache side.
    
            Our license does not allow publishing such files, which would be
            derivative works from files which are currently under our 
proprietary
            license. Although we could grant you permission to do that, we are
            currently very hesitant to do so. Here's why: Unless there is 
someone
            who actively maintains these typings, they would quickly become 
outdated
            because with every new release we add new features and APIs. The 
only
            way someone could reasonably maintain such a file (about 10k public 
API
            members, 7 MB TypeScript definition file) would be through a
            (semi-automatic?) conversion process. Thus both from a practical and
            legal perspective it would make a lot more sense to have a tool that
            reads our API definition files and creates the typedefs. Any 
licensed
            yFiles user could make use of this tool and would always get the
            typedefs matching her yFiles version.
    
            For you reference: This is what someone else did to get yFiles for 
HTML
            to work seemlessly with Kotlin/JS: 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fturansky%2Fyfiles-kotlin&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418303635&amp;sdata=lULV6HBxMgNMfzBYX9sTiyMszHjnbhZgqdCP1iIrabE%3D&amp;reserved=0
            They got explicit permission from us for this (because they do not
            publish the original files).
    
            >
            > b) Would yWorks consider porting yFiles to Royale?
    
            Yes, if and once we get reasonable amount of feedback and customer
            interest. If you're interested in licensing yFiles for Apache 
Royale,
            please do state so and/or contact our support team:  
yworks.com/contact<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fyworks.com%2Fcontact&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418303635&amp;sdata=k0Rcy9aSp6rNV0Vwe9szbW5crWgjZekNETX6GLVYPdY%3D&amp;reserved=0>
            FWIW the vast majoriy of our previous yFiles FLEX customers has
            successfully migrated to "native web" technologies and is now 
happily
            using yFiles for HTML: With the current state of Apache Royale and 
the
            web, we don't see that Apache Royale has gained enough traction that
            would justify the efforts.
            We currently believe that creating the diagramming part using 
"classic"
            TypeScript/JavaScript and wrapping the resulting component up in a 
small
            Royale component with a tiny API surface is the superios and more
            efficient approach.
    
    
            From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:[email protected]>
            Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2020 11:37 PM
            To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
            Subject: RE: YFiles, EPL, Apache
    
            Ok, I contacted them. I’ll let you guys know.
    
            ________________________________
            From: Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
            Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2020 6:58:17 PM
            To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
            Subject: Re: YFiles, EPL, Apache
    
            Hi,
    
            I think you should contact yFiles directly and talk with them about 
it.
            That's better to try to figure if something could be wrong in the 
future.
    
            My understanding is that he should be able to give you permission 
since it
            implies make his commercial lib to clients that want to use in 
Royale.
            So that clientes will still need to pay for the commercial version, 
while
            if no typedefs are done, it will be more difficult to do.
    
    
    
            El dom., 12 ene. 2020 a las 16:30, Yishay Weiss 
(<[email protected]>)
            escribió:
    
            >
            > Hi,
            >
            > Before I start making inquiries in legal I wonder if anyone here 
can give
            > me some guidance.
            >
            > I want to create typedefs for yFiles [1], using an externs [2] 
file that’s
            > under an EPL [3]. Should that be a problem?
            >
            > This issue [4] makes me extra cautious.
            >
            > Thanks.
            >
            > [1] 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.yworks.com%2Fproducts%2Fyfiles-for-html&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418303635&amp;sdata=qFQidbak8J9KHiwV%2F6UpPf6yYc3J%2BRq9yJSAGkACXmA%3D&amp;reserved=0
            > [2]
            > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githubusercontent.com%2Fhonzabrecka%2Fts-to-goog%2Fmaster%2Fexterns%2Fyfiles.extern.js&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418303635&amp;sdata=KmoguurvdgxgUO7e04MWQCDXaECqjfK7WOBz9OOcZVs%3D&amp;reserved=0
            > [3] 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fhonzabrecka%2Fts-to-goog%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2FLICENSE&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418303635&amp;sdata=4r8jUg70%2BGcUeUqzShy4wGvFXs%2FpAZ3pXr%2Fs6n0Gmz4%3D&amp;reserved=0
            > [4] 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FDefinitelyTyped%2FDefinitelyTyped%2Fissues%2F23310&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418303635&amp;sdata=XFsqQcBx2NfbRZR9V2E6cnQd%2Bct0ztfi6rj5G%2B08RhA%3D&amp;reserved=0
            >
    
    
            --
            Carlos Rovira
            
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca9b44f7e3ff8404afe7608d7a91df381%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637163818418303635&amp;sdata=cB%2FVpnZiiw%2FDflbN3XQWxlwM0RQ8EUf9uyWYYhJUyAg%3D&amp;reserved=0
    
    
    
    
    
    

Reply via email to