Hi Alex, thanks that helped. In fact I recently made some Jewel layouts signal "sizeChanged" events, but then changed to signal "layoutNeeded" events since seems to me more natural in that case. That solved other issues in DataGrid layout, where content overflows boundaries in the grid or not depending on the size of the parent. I made a quick try if now the requestAnimationFrame could be removed but still no luck on that. Now that I know more about it I'll try something more as I have more time to spend on that. For now it works, and this is just refinement.
Thanks! El mar., 10 mar. 2020 a las 5:14, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Royale tries to rely on two paths: > 1) width/heightSizedToContent > 2) parent sizes the component. > > There is a 3rd path where the width/height is set which usually goes down > path #1. > > I've seen some situations where the isWidthSizedToContent gets fooled and > the problem is making that smarter. > > Otherwise, in case #2, you are welcome to skip laying out in initComplete > if you can rely on the widthChanged/heightChanged/sizeChanged events as the > parent sizes the child. However I think there may be some holes in that > for some flexbox and other fancy CSS layouts. Some layouts in the parent > don't set the child's width/height, they just set the CSS and let the > browser size everything. It may be those layouts need to at least send a > sizeChanged to each child. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 3/9/20, 3:50 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > now that I get Jewel DataGrid width and height solved I want to ask > about a > problem I found while developing it: > > At the time the Jewel DataGrid start to be instantiated the > DataGridLayout > run at the end of the DataGridView's "initComplete" event handler > (that I > assume is the final point where all should be set and ready. At that > time > width and percentWidth is not known by the _strand or by internal view > components (in this case listArea part or internal column lists). For > example width or height could be 0 for each component named before > when set > up to percentage. Just is a pixel right value when set up to a concrete > pixel value. > (note: that the problem is really for components that does not define > width/height or use % values). > > So I finally need to use requestAnimationFrame check [1] until I get > right > values. > > So that part could be right for JS way of doing things, but I think is > a > bit of a hack and want to know if other's known a better way to do it. > Maybe I need to request a "layoutNeeded" in other place. > > Thanks > > [1] > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2F5a73eb51d73f7b5f43df36098518a2af9072ef4f%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FJewel%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fjewel%2Fbeads%2Flayouts%2FDataGridLayout.as%23L111&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cef0b32ce57994738ca0808d7c47c4043%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637193910240617036&sdata=JO9ZaSOoWXvjLuvJ16lwAqpbcdu9QcXVsGVmNkrNXOw%3D&reserved=0 > -- > Carlos Rovira > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cef0b32ce57994738ca0808d7c47c4043%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637193910240617036&sdata=X1xBafwREW4WyE%2F4XnO2WdONeYTjJmnAm39kNL0mkRI%3D&reserved=0 > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
