Hi Piotr, I think you can workaround temporally but we need a solution to work easily with width="100%" at framework level. That's the reason for Royale or for a framework.
About the problem you're having is that I need to dispatch "sizeChanged" event. I'll try it to add soon so you can try it. Thanks El sáb., 14 mar. 2020 a las 17:13, Piotr Zarzycki (< [email protected]>) escribió: > Carlos, > > If solution to my case is setup width - I may figure out somehow how to get > width of the parent container and setup it to the grid - workaround for now > - However it doesn't actually work in a way that I would be able to apply > that workaround. > > In the other words if I have below situation - My grid is working properly > along with columnWidth. > > <j:VGroup> > <j:DataGrid id="listEmails" width="500" dataProvider={dp} /> > </j:VGroup> > > However if I have following code it doesn't work but it actually should! > > <j:VGroup initComplete="onInit(event)"> > <j:DataGrid id="listEmails" dataProvider={dp} /> > </j:VGroup> > > private function onInit (event:Event):void > { > this.listEmails.width = 500; > } > > Thanks, > Piotr > > > > pt., 13 mar 2020 o 15:18 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]> > napisał(a): > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > I just checked your improvements and those one with columnWidth doesn't > > work as it should in our use case. I just committed additional example in > > TourDeJewel which shows that case. Take a look how DataGrid look like in > > that example. > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > pon., 9 mar 2020 o 16:42 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > napisał(a): > > > >> Hi Piotr, > >> > >> DataGrid now has 3 improvements: > >> > >> > >> - No default width or height > >> - width and height can be not set or set to pixels or % values > >> - columnWidths can be no set at all, set all or just some to pixels > (I > >> didn't loo > >> > >> Notice that, we don't support % in columns since there's no way to set > >> columns to percentages. We want to support it?. Maybe we can introduce > >> "columnPercentWidth" ? Not sure about this > >> > >> I'll take a look at the initializer problem with Lists and Dgs. > Regarding > >> this, what's the use case or why you want to change the initializer? > >> having > >> some kind of example will help me with this, since right now don't know > so > >> much about it. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Carlos > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> El vie., 6 mar. 2020 a las 17:32, Carlos Rovira (< > [email protected] > >> >) > >> escribió: > >> > >> > I'm thinking that the last problem need a solution like the one in > >> > ComboBox with passing the IR class to the internal List. > >> > (Although some issue is still in the mapper infrastructure, but I > think > >> is > >> > separated issue). > >> > > >> > > >> > El vie., 6 mar. 2020 a las 17:24, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> > [email protected]>) escribió: > >> > > >> >> Both issues with width/height and this one block migration for now in > >> our > >> >> application from Table to DataGrid. I would be the first one who test > >> it > >> >> for sure when you find cause of that issue and fix it. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks for that update, > >> >> Piotr > >> >> > >> >> pt., 6 mar 2020 o 17:17 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > >> >> napisał(a): > >> >> > >> >> > Hi Piotr, > >> >> > > >> >> > yesterday I saw a strange behaviour with controls that compose list > >> and > >> >> > Item renderer changes done recently, but was in ComboBox that can > >> >> configure > >> >> > an Item renderer and then pass to the ComboBoxPopUp to its List > >> internal > >> >> > component (so we can have custom renderers in ComboBox). In this > case > >> >> > rowCount and rowHeight is not working as expected, sin ce there > >> >> initializer > >> >> > is not used in ComboBox internal list, while in VirtualComboBox is > >> >> working > >> >> > ok. > >> >> > I trace the problem to Mappers not update right when the renderers > >> >> refactor > >> >> > was done. So while the mapper in Basic adds initializer, in Jewel > is > >> not > >> >> > doing that. I could not invest more time since I was in the middle > of > >> >> other > >> >> > fixes, and still had the width/height issues in DG, so could not > see > >> >> > exactly what's the problem. > >> >> > I want to see if now that this refactor is done is safe to remove > >> jewel > >> >> > mappers to user basic versions, but a quick test reveal that is not > >> >> direct. > >> >> > In resume, about your problem, I think it could be something like > the > >> >> one > >> >> > with ComboBox, but need to have the time to reach to that point, > >> >> hopefully > >> >> > soon. > >> >> > Thanks > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> > >> >> Piotr Zarzycki > >> >> > >> >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > >> >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Carlos Rovira > >> > http://about.me/carlosrovira > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> Carlos Rovira > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
