Another thing we just discovered.

The current setup seems to mess up the branches:
- 001 creates the branch and updates develop rel = 0.9.7-SNAPSHOT, develop = 
0.9.8-SNAPSHOT
- 001b updates DEVELOP and not the release branch
- 002 pushes develop to the release-branch hereby bumping the release branch to 
the next version rel = 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT, develop = 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT

If the 001b changes would have been done in the release branch, develop would 
still be using the old version.

So I would propose to change the order of 001 and 001b to "release" the build 
tools before branching.

And I would propose to fix 002 to work on the right branch. As I could see in 
maven central you have been releasing only even version number so I assume this 
problem exists for quite some time now.

Chris

Am 23.03.20, 20:12 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]>:

    Hi,
    we just saw that windows stores a personal access token in Windows
    Crendetials, so the RM is responsible to remove it when finish all the
    operations.
    
    
    El lun., 23 mar. 2020 a las 19:44, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
    escribió:
    
    >
    >
    > On 3/23/20, 11:32 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>
    > wrote:
    >
    >     Hi Alex,
    >
    >     I did check and I didn't directly find any .git .ssh or whatsoever
    > directories ... do you have an Idea where that would be saved on windows?
    >     The commits are authorized by Carlos and it's his RDP connection,
    > that's why I'm asking if there is any RDP magic going on. I didn't see him
    > entering anything anywhere and he said he didn't do it before.
    >
    > I don't know for sure, but here's a few links:
    >
    >
    > 
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46878457/adding-git-credentials-on-windows
    >
    > https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Credential-Storage
    >
    > I'm wondering if Carlos can remember if he did.anything like that back
    > when he wrote this:
    >
    > 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8ae38cea0c736418b432b2353f967161c4f8448261a3bdce390e8c46%40%3Cdev.royale.apache.org%3E
    >
    > As I replied back then, we shouldn't have GPG signing on the CI Server,
    > and hopefully no other credentials got added either.
    >
    > HTH,
    > -Alex
    >
    > PS: I'm purposefully not looking myself so as not to accidentally boot
    > someone off the RDP connection.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    
    -- 
    Carlos Rovira
    http://about.me/carlosrovira
    

Reply via email to