Hi Yishay thanks go ahead, and report you findings :)
El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 14:28, Yishay Weiss (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Hi Carlos, > > > > I’m not yet convinced by Chris’s arguments. I think the quickest path to a > release is for me to start one this evening using the CI server, which I > intend to do unless anyone has objections to that. > > > > *From:* Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 1, 2020 2:44:03 PM > *To:* Apache Royale Development <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: Some info from the current CI server emails > > > > Hi Yishay, > > if we are not doing objections to any of us using any of the RM process > available is ok for me. But I though Alex was not on that page for what I > saw in his other thread response. > > About technical requeriments. Are you ok with the evidences Chris reported > various times about that the new standard process is all what we need? > > He responded again some minutes ago to the other list > > Thanks > > Carlos > > > > > > El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 11:19, Yishay Weiss (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > > > > > >If we are discussing if we can use just CI Server, yes I think we need > to > > >vote, since I'm not with that. > > > > That’s why I wanted to keep the technical requirements thread concise. > > It’s not about whether or not to use the CI server. It’s about a list of > > requirements for any build method. Chris has done a good job of gathering > > the abstract requirements. We have one issue which is not agreed on by > > Alex, and having understood things better, myself. I think we need to > vote > > on that. > > > > El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 11:07, Yishay Weiss (<[email protected] > >) > > escribió: > > > > > I was hoping the technical requirements thread would spawn a vote on > the > > > remaining issues. If the result is that the maven solution as it stands > > > today does not meet the agreed requirements then we will have no choice > > but > > > to use the CI server process. > > > > > > Assuming that’s the situation, I will wait for Alex to report on what > > he’s > > > doing and if everyone else is ok with it I’ll start working on the > > release > > > after that, hopefully this evening my time. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 11:37 AM > > > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>> > > > Subject: Some info from the current CI server emails > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > taking into account that Chris and I simplified each CI Server step > > (until > > > step 7) improving it but removing parameters that was not necessary and > > > that streamlined CI Server a lot, I want to analyze recent CI Server > > > emails. > > > > > > Alex, that is the most skilled in the CI Server steps from us, started > > > CI step 1 again. Just "CI Step 1" took him to complete from 6:57am to > > > 8:14am (my time). That means more than one hour and a quarter. > > > > > > And he had 3 fails as we can see in our emails. Probably because of > > server > > > hanging and he need to restart 3 times, or due to things not working > > > properly for him, what means the same can happen to the rest of us. > > > > > > https://imgur.com/a/AgRH9cB > > > > > > There's still 12 steps more, to do (and many more time consuming that > > step > > > 1). > > > > > > Just want to expose it to see if that helps all of us here to > > > understand some of the current problems we are having > > > > > > HTH > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > *From: *Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Wednesday, April 1, 2020 2:44 PM > *Subject: *Re: Some info from the current CI server emails > > > > Hi Yishay, > > if we are not doing objections to any of us using any of the RM process > available is ok for me. But I though Alex was not on that page for what I > saw in his other thread response. > > About technical requeriments. Are you ok with the evidences Chris reported > various times about that the new standard process is all what we need? > > He responded again some minutes ago to the other list > > Thanks > > Carlos > > > > > > El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 11:19, Yishay Weiss (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > > > > > >If we are discussing if we can use just CI Server, yes I think we need > to > > >vote, since I'm not with that. > > > > That’s why I wanted to keep the technical requirements thread concise. > > It’s not about whether or not to use the CI server. It’s about a list of > > requirements for any build method. Chris has done a good job of gathering > > the abstract requirements. We have one issue which is not agreed on by > > Alex, and having understood things better, myself. I think we need to > vote > > on that. > > > > El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 11:07, Yishay Weiss (<[email protected] > >) > > escribió: > > > > > I was hoping the technical requirements thread would spawn a vote on > the > > > remaining issues. If the result is that the maven solution as it stands > > > today does not meet the agreed requirements then we will have no choice > > but > > > to use the CI server process. > > > > > > Assuming that’s the situation, I will wait for Alex to report on what > > he’s > > > doing and if everyone else is ok with it I’ll start working on the > > release > > > after that, hopefully this evening my time. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 11:37 AM > > > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>> > > > Subject: Some info from the current CI server emails > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > taking into account that Chris and I simplified each CI Server step > > (until > > > step 7) improving it but removing parameters that was not necessary and > > > that streamlined CI Server a lot, I want to analyze recent CI Server > > > emails. > > > > > > Alex, that is the most skilled in the CI Server steps from us, started > > > CI step 1 again. Just "CI Step 1" took him to complete from 6:57am to > > > 8:14am (my time). That means more than one hour and a quarter. > > > > > > And he had 3 fails as we can see in our emails. Probably because of > > server > > > hanging and he need to restart 3 times, or due to things not working > > > properly for him, what means the same can happen to the rest of us. > > > > > > https://imgur.com/a/AgRH9cB > > > > > > There's still 12 steps more, to do (and many more time consuming that > > step > > > 1). > > > > > > Just want to expose it to see if that helps all of us here to > > > understand some of the current problems we are having > > > > > > HTH > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
