Hi Josh, so if I understand correctly your words, for cases where the function is called the same as the typedef and we have params and return values we need to create a function as I did and then add the rest of functions in separate files in the packaged named the same as the typedef?
Regarding "marked" example, I got the initial example working, but I'm trying to configure options that require create internal types in marked, and I'm not got it already. thanks El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 18:00, Josh Tynjala (<[email protected]>) escribió: > It's not ideal, but one way that I've found to define a typedef function > that exposes "static" functions similar to a class is to put those "static" > functions into a package with the same name as the root function. > > package > { > /** > * @externs > */ > COMPILE::JS > public function marked(s:String):String { > return null; > }; > } > > package marked > { > /** > * @externs > * configure marked with options > */ > COMPILE::JS > public function setOptions(o:Object):void {}; > } > > Another option is to use dynamic access, but that won't be checked by the > compiler. > > marked["setOptions"]() > > -- > Josh Tynjala > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 7:39 AM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Yishay, > > > > this finally worked (declaring as a function): > > > > package > > { > > /** > > * @externs > > */ > > COMPILE::JS > > public function marked(s:String):String { > > return null; > > }; > > } > > > > I see two problems with this approach > > > > 1. inject_html is not valid, So I need other wrapper class to add the > > inject_html and use marked within, to make usable as a piece of code > > (don't > > like let the user to add the .js script to the html template > > 2. Since is a function I can add other API functions like setOptions. > > ie: > > > > /** > > * configure marked with options > > */ > > COMPILE::JS > > public function setOptions(o:Object):void {}; > > > > Would like to be know how to declare this as a class to add other > function > > APIs available in the js library > > > > > > El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 11:14, Yishay Weiss (<[email protected] > >) > > escribió: > > > > > You can just return null. > > > > > > I think the best thing for you to do is to go to one of the typedefs, > > > build, and look at the generated sources. > > > > > > For example > > > > > > cd …\royale-typedefs > > > cd google_maps > > > ant; > > > cd target\generated-sources > > > > > > Explore the .as classes there. > > > > > > Hope this helps. > > > > > > From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:[email protected]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 12:05 PM > > > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: Problems to create AS3 externs when JS library returns > some > > > kind of object > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > additional to this, is how we can create an extern function that return > > > something: > > > > > > public function someFoo(s:String):String {}; > > > > > > AS3 expect here some return value inside the brackets. So how we can > > write > > > this in AS3 without errors? > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 10:48, Carlos Rovira (< > > [email protected] > > > >) > > > escribió: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'm playing with a js markdown library [1] to see if is an option to > > make > > > > a Royale website that load markdown and render it (I'm experimenting > to > > > see > > > > if we can't remove wordpress from our website and make a web based on > > > > markdown similar to royale-docs) > > > > > > > > I'm having problems trying to create the extern as3 file. I'm trying > > > > something similar to what we did with hljs. Here's my try: > > > > > > > > > > > > package > > > > { > > > > /** > > > > * marked js library > > > > */ > > > > COMPILE::JS > > > > public class marked > > > > { > > > > /** > > > > * > > > > * <inject_html> > > > > * <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/marked/marked.min.js > > > > "></script> > > > > * </inject_html> > > > > * > > > > * @royaleignorecoercion String > > > > */ > > > > public function marked(s:String):String {}; > > > > > > > > /** > > > > * configure marked with options > > > > */ > > > > public function setOptions(o:Object):void {}; > > > > } > > > > } > > > > > > > > The problem is > > > > > > > > public function marked(s:String):String {}; > > > > > > > > since the library gets a String and returns a String, but AS3 > > > constructors > > > > must be void > > > > > > > > I remember Josh posted alternative ways to create this kind of AS3 > > stubs, > > > > but he posted in a paste apache that is now gone. > > > > Anyway would be good to know if this is a limitation of AS3 language > > and > > > > we can't create this kind of AS3 classes that model a JS library with > > > > constructors that return something like a string. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > [1] https://marked.js.org/#/README.md#usage > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
