I’m not sure I understand the question. As I understand it, the compiler will be built using the latest sources under compiler-build-tools. There are no recent code changes there as far as I can tell. I may be missing something.
From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:10 PM To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0 Ok Yishay, and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process? thanks El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Hi Carlos, > > It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet. > > From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0 > > Hi > > can we consider this vote finished? > > also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so the > fixes will be not applied > > Maybe I'm wrong > > Thanks > > > > El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > > > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours are > > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-) > > > > Harbs > > > > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build > > Tools. The release candidate can be found here; > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ > > > > > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements > > on approving a release?', at: > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > > > > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that: > > > - SHA and signed packages are correct > > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine > > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes > > successfully > > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of > > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler. > > > > > > The KEYS file is at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS > > > > > > Maven artifacts are staged here: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064 > > > > > > Please vote to approve this release: > > > +1 Approve the release > > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why) > > > > > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called. > > > > > > The vote passes if there is: > > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC > > > - More positive votes than negative votes > > > > > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be > > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the > RC, > > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality > that > > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC > > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their > votes > > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes. > > > > > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR > > version you tested with. > > > > > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common > > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the > > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead: > > > 1) create an empty folder, > > > 2) download into that folder this file: > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml > > > 3) run the script: > > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3 > > > > > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the > > packages and build results are always encouraged. > > > > > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread > > not this VOTE thread. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Yishay Weiss > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
