Dev branch is at 0.9.8, so that's when your changes will go out,.

-Alex

On 4/20/20, 9:47 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <[email protected]> wrote:

    I added some 0.9.7 release notes for both royale-compiler and royale-asjs.
    I committed them to develop, though, so feel free to cherry-pick or
    whatever.
    
    --
    Josh Tynjala
    Bowler Hat LLC 
<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5610011ed24409e3ff808d7e54a8468%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229980521581300&amp;sdata=ggjch7VMFRMksgV5hRF60Ir9s%2FOFqWcFq07EormYcUs%3D&amp;reserved=0>
    
    
    On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 6:21 AM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
    wrote:
    
    > Hi Greg
    >
    > for compiler: just added improvements to maven by Chris Dutz and Maven
    > Distribution (that's now working) to create SDK with Maven
    > I think in compiler Josh should add many of his improvements
    >
    > Going to check framework
    >
    > thanks
    >
    > Carlos
    >
    >
    >
    > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 2:02, Greg Dove (<[email protected]>)
    > escribió:
    >
    > > I pushed some changes to both compiler and asjs release notes in branch
    > > release/0.9.7
    > >
    > > I'd like to suggest that others review this and add more as needed (as
    > > opposed to waiting until late in the process to do it).
    > >
    > >
    > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:25 AM Greg Dove <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > > > Ok, thanks for clarifying Alex. I will do that later today.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:03 AM Alex Harui <[email protected]>
    > > > wrote:
    > > >
    > > >> IMO, there is no perfect solution.  There will be times where the
    > > release
    > > >> branch is so broken that it will be tossed and re-cut from develop.
    > But
    > > >> this time around we are trying to keep the release branches around, 
so
    > > make
    > > >> changes to the release branch and make sure the RM knows so they RM
    > > knows
    > > >> to merge changes back in case we get to the toss-and-re-cut point.
    > > >>
    > > >> Thanks,
    > > >> -Alex
    > > >>
    > > >> On 4/17/20, 3:20 PM, "Greg Dove" <[email protected]> wrote:
    > > >>
    > > >>     I am not sure whether the current work on 0.9.7 release is a dry
    > run
    > > >> or a
    > > >>     full effort (I have not been reading all details recently,
    > sorry). I
    > > >> assume
    > > >>     it is a full release effort.
    > > >>
    > > >>     For 0.9.6 release we had a collective rush to add things to
    > RELEASE
    > > >> NOTES
    > > >>     before release.
    > > >>
    > > >>     I have a few things I want to add to RELEASE NOTES. But I would
    > also
    > > >> like
    > > >>     to make sure I apply our collective learning from last time.
    > > >>
    > > >>     The issue last time (iirc) was that we pushed updates into 
develop
    > > >> branch
    > > >>     which I think then were being cherry picked into release branch.
    > > This
    > > >> I
    > > >>     believe contributed to some merge conflicts at some point.
    > > >>     Can I get a definitive answer for where I should add updates to
    > > >> RELEASE
    > > >>     NOTES at this point if it is not too late? I think it is probably
    > > >> supposed
    > > >>     to be directly into release branch which then gets merged later
    > back
    > > >> into
    > > >>     develop, but I'd like a confirmation of that if it is correct 
(and
    > > >> not too
    > > >>     late), please.
    > > >>
    > > >>
    > > >>
    > >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Carlos Rovira
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5610011ed24409e3ff808d7e54a8468%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229980521581300&amp;sdata=bYVSf9Zg5R9DzuwNQIYgZ0o12s4kImSrVtBvTkCFU6U%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >
    

Reply via email to