Hi Guys, Two way binding is possible using following notation in MXML
<fx:Binding source="voObj.firstName" destination="myTextInput.text" /> <fx:Binding source=" myTextInput .text" destination=" voObj .firstName" /> It doesn't work always. There are some issues. I have reported them somewhere. I hope some day Greg will look into that. Thanks, Piotr pon., 27 kwi 2020 o 10:45 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> napisał(a): > Thanks Andrew and Alex, > > @Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]>, can you please respond to Yu Taro > as > you do the doc changes? > > thanks in advance! > > El dom., 26 abr. 2020 a las 19:37, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > > > IMO, the answer should be some variant of the usual “we need volunteers > to > > make it happen”. I can’t immediately think of any reason that > HTML/JS/CSS > > would make it impossible. The answer regarding missing features should > > rarely be “no”. We should try to educate people that Apache projects are > > volunteer-driven, that folks can directly pay volunteers to do work, that > > no corporation is investing in development of features like Adobe did, > and > > we generally implement the features that folks can find volunteers to > > produce. > > > > And yes, event listeners are a workaround for now. > > > > My 2 cents, > > -Alex > > > > From: Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> > > Date: Sunday, April 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM > > To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]>, Alex Harui < > > [email protected]> > > Subject: Re: Two way databinding question in SOF > > > > I think @Alex Harui<mailto:[email protected]> pointed out once that one > > can achieve data binding with event listeners. > > > > Our help docs page on data binding [1] is incomplete. I will try to > finish > > that soon, and will add a note saying explicitly that, at the moment, > > two-way binding is not available without the workaround I mentioned. > > > > [1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/features/data-binding< > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.github.io%2Froyale-docs%2Ffeatures%2Fdata-binding&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765071097&sdata=UdOHR1S24%2BiUgSY9fqVAA9CmCWseaobIs4shb6g1VsY%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > a > > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:35 AM Carlos Rovira <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > someone can respond this new question on SOF [1]? > > > > I can't say nothing about it than "we don't support it", but maybe others > > can give some light about plans for two way data binding. > > > > [1] > > > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61409429/does-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now > > < > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F61409429%2Fdoes-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=qmCTXbd38vGBq5NWfDdtJKa3Dawi1hGv4MJK%2BpWIqOM%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira< > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=6TrvNEdWXGez4lNhs2fzLfhAUibzJ9HaxVyTTUzLRoY%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/< > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=0HYokw%2FBrv3%2FJ6fk0DHJXT5hNBA01nirUBzpQKkcNuE%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
